Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Eur J Pain ; 27(10): 1226-1238, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37358263

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infrared laser stimulation is a valuable tool in pain research, its primary application being the recording of laser-evoked brain potentials (LEPs). Different types of laser stimulators, varying in their skin penetrance, are likely to have a large influence on the LEPs, when stimulating different skin types. The aim of this study was to investigate how LEPs depend on laser type and skin location. METHODS: Two different laser stimulators (CO2 and Nd:YAP) were used to compare LEPs in healthy subjects. Stimuli were delivered to the hand dorsum and palm to investigate the effects of skin type on the evoked responses. Stimulus-evoked brain responses were recorded using EEG and perceived intensity ratings were recorded. Computational modelling was used to investigate the observed differences. RESULTS: LEPs evoked by stimulation of the hairy skin were similar between CO2 and Nd:YAP stimulation. In contrast, LEPs elicited from the palm were markedly different and barely present for CO2 stimulation. There was a significant interaction between laser type and skin type (RM-ANOVA, p < 0.05) likely due to smaller CO2 LEPs in the palm. CO2 stimuli to the palm also elicited significantly lower perceived intensities. The computational model showed that the observed differences were explainable by the laser absorption characteristics and skin thickness affecting the temperature profile at the dermo-epidermal junction (DEJ). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that LEP elicitation depends on the combination of laser penetrance and skin type. Low penetrance stimuli, from a CO2 laser, elicited significantly lower LEPs and perceived intensities in the palm. SIGNIFICANCE: This study showed that the elicitation of laser-evoked potentials in healthy humans greatly depends on the combination of laser stimulator type and skin type. It was shown that high penetrance laser stimuli are capable of eliciting responses in both hairy and glabrous skin, whereas low penetrance stimuli barely elicited responses from the glabrous skin. Computational modelling was used to demonstrate that the results could be fully explained by the combination of laser type and skin thickness.

2.
J Pain ; 24(6): 1039-1055, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36720295

ABSTRACT

Repetitive movements (RM) are a main risk factor for musculoskeletal pain, which is partly explained by the overloading of musculoskeletal structures. However, RM may also drive brain plasticity, leading to maladaptive changes in sensorimotor areas and altered pain processing. This study aimed to understand whether individuals performing extensive RM (musicians) exhibit altered brain processing to prolonged experimental muscle pain. Nineteen healthy musicians and 20 healthy nontrained controls attended 3 sessions (Day 1-Day 3-Day 8). In each session, event-related potentials (ERPs) to non-nociceptive superficial and nociceptive intraepidermal electrical stimulation, reaction times, electrical detection thresholds, and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were recorded. In all participants, prolonged muscle pain was induced by intramuscular injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) into the right first dorsal interosseous muscle at the end of Day1. Pain intensity was assessed on a numerical rating scale (NRS) and was lower in musicians compared to non-musicians (P < .007). Moreover, in musicians, the higher amount of weekly training was associated with lower NRS pain scores on Day 3 to Day 8 (P < .037). Compared with Day1, NGF reduced PPTs on Day 3 to Day 8 (P < .001) and non-nociceptive P200 and P300 ERP amplitudes on Day 8 (P < .044) in both groups. Musicians compared to controls showed secondary hyperalgesia to electrical stimulation on Day 3 to Day 8 (P < .004) and reduced nociceptive P200 ERP amplitudes on Day 8 (P < .005). Across participants, ERP components correlated with pain detection reaction times, sensitivity (PPTs and electrical detection thresholds), and severity (NRS), (all P < .043). These results show that repetitive sensorimotor training leads to brain changes in the processing of prolonged pain, biasing the cortical response to nociceptive inputs. PERSPECTIVE: Repetitive sensorimotor training may increase the responsiveness of nociceptive inputs during the development of prolonged muscle pain. These novel data highlight the role of repetitive sensorimotor practice as a source for interindividual variability in central pain processing.


Subject(s)
Myalgia , Neuralgia , Humans , Myalgia/etiology , Nerve Growth Factor , Pain Threshold/physiology , Pain Measurement , Hyperalgesia/chemically induced , Neuralgia/complications
3.
Eur J Pain ; 27(2): 257-277, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36394423

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prolonged and repeated sensorimotor training is a crucial driver for promoting use-dependent plasticity, but also a main risk factor for developing musculoskeletal pain syndromes, yet the neural underpinnings that link repetitive movements to abnormal pain processing are unknown. METHODS: Twenty healthy musicians, one of the best in vivo models to study use-dependent plasticity, and 20 healthy non-musicians were recruited. Perceptual thresholds, reaction times (RTs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded using nociceptive intra-epidermal and non-nociceptive transcutaneous electrical stimulation. RESULTS: In response to comparable stimulus intensities, musicians compared to non-musicians showed larger non-nociceptive N140 (associated with higher activation of regions within the salience network), higher nociceptive N200 ERPs (associated with higher activation of regions within the sensorimotor network) and faster RTs to both stimuli. Non-musicians showed larger non-nociceptive P200 ERP. Notably, a similar P200 component prominently emerged during nociceptive stimulation in non-musicians. Across participants, larger N140 and N200 ERPs were associated with RTs, whereas the amount of daily practice in musicians explained non-nociceptive P200 and nociceptive P300 ERPs. CONCLUSIONS: These novel findings indicate that the mechanisms by which extensive sensorimotor training promotes use-dependent plasticity in multisensory neural structures may also shape the neural signatures of nociceptive processing in healthy individuals. SIGNIFICANCE: Repetitive sensorimotor training may increase the responsiveness of nociceptive evoked potentials. These novel data highlight the importance of repetitive sensorimotor practice as a contributing factor to the interindividual variability of nociceptive-related potentials.


Subject(s)
Electroencephalography , Evoked Potentials , Humans , Evoked Potentials/physiology
4.
J Neural Eng ; 19(1)2022 01 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34996054

ABSTRACT

Objective.Small area electrodes enable preferential activation of nociceptive fibers. It is debated, however, whether co-activation of large fibers still occurs for the existing electrode designs. Moreover, existing electrodes are limited to low stimulation intensities, for which behavioral and physiological responses may be considered less reliable. A recent optimization study showed that there is a potential for improving electrode performance and increase the range of possible stimulation intensities. Based on those results, the present study introduces and tests a novel planar concentric array electrode design for small fiber activation in healthy volunteers.Approach.Volunteers received electrical stimulation with the planar concentric array electrode and a regular patch electrode. Perception thresholds (PT) were estimated at the beginning and the end of the experiment. Evoked cortical potentials were recorded in blocks of 30 stimuli. For the patch, stimulation current intensity was set to two times PT, while three intensities, two, five, and ten times PT, were applied with the planar concentric array electrode. Sensation quality, numerical-rating scores, and reaction times were obtained for each PT estimation and during each block of evoked potential recordings.Main results.Stimulation with the patch electrode was characterized as dull, while stimulation with the planar concentric array electrode was characterized as sharp, with increased sharpness for increasing stimulus current intensity. Likewise, scores of the numerical rating scale were higher for the planar concentric array electrode compared to the patch and increased with increasing stimulation current intensity. Reaction times and ERP latencies were longer for the planar concentric array electrode compared to the patch.Significance.The presented novel planar concentric array electrode is a small, non-invasive, and single-use electrode that has the potential to investigate small fiber neuropathy and pain mechanisms, as it is small fiber preferential for a wide range of stimulation intensities.


Subject(s)
Nociceptors , Skin , Electric Stimulation/methods , Electrodes , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Humans , Nociceptors/physiology
5.
Hum Brain Mapp ; 42(8): 2461-2476, 2021 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33605512

ABSTRACT

Pain arises from the integration of sensory and cognitive processes in the brain, resulting in specific patterns of neural oscillations that can be characterized by measuring electrical brain activity. Current source density (CSD) estimation from low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) and its standardized (sLORETA) and exact (eLORETA) variants, is a common approach to identify the spatiotemporal dynamics of the brain sources in physiological and pathological pain-related conditions. However, there is no consensus on the magnitude and variability of clinically or experimentally relevant effects for CSD estimations. Here, we systematically examined reports of sample size calculations and effect size estimations in all studies that included the keywords pain, and LORETA, sLORETA, or eLORETA in Scopus and PubMed. We also assessed the reliability of LORETA CSD estimations during non-painful and painful conditions to estimate hypothetical sample sizes for future experiments using CSD estimations. We found that none of the studies included in the systematic review reported sample size calculations, and less than 20% reported measures of central tendency and dispersion, which are necessary to estimate effect sizes. Based on these data and our experimental results, we determined that sample sizes commonly used in pain studies using CSD estimations are suitable to detect medium and large effect sizes in crossover designs and only large effects in parallel designs. These results provide a comprehensive summary of the effect sizes observed using LORETA in pain research, and this information can be used by clinicians and researchers to improve settings and designs of future pain studies.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping/standards , Brain/physiopathology , Electroencephalography/standards , Pain/physiopathology , Tomography/standards , Humans
6.
Brain Topogr ; 34(2): 192-206, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33403561

ABSTRACT

Musculoskeletal pain is a clinical condition that is characterized by ongoing pain and discomfort in the deep tissues such as muscle, bones, ligaments, nerves, and tendons. In the last decades, it was subject to extensive research due to its high prevalence. Still, a quantitative description of the electrical brain activity during musculoskeletal pain is lacking. This study aimed to characterize intracranial current source density (CSD) estimations during sustained deep-tissue experimental pain. Twenty-three healthy volunteers received three types of tonic stimuli for three minutes each: computer-controlled cuff pressure (1) below pain threshold (sustained deep-tissue no-pain, SDTnP), (2) above pain threshold (sustained deep-tissue pain, SDTP) and (3) vibrotactile stimulation (VT). The CSD in response to these stimuli was calculated in seven regions of interest (ROIs) likely involved in pain processing: contralateral anterior cingulate cortex, contralateral primary somatosensory cortex, bilateral anterior insula, contralateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex and contralateral premotor cortex. Results showed that participants exhibited an overall increase in spectral power during SDTP in all seven ROIs compared to both SDTnP and VT, likely reflecting the differences in the salience of these stimuli. Moreover, we observed a difference is CSD due to the type of stimulus, likely reflecting somatosensory discrimination of stimulus intensity. These results describe the different contributions of neural oscillations within these brain regions in the processing of sustained deep-tissue pain.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping , Nociceptive Pain , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Electroencephalography , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Somatosensory Cortex
7.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair ; 35(1): 68-78, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33218284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Predict Recovery Potential algorithm (PREP2) was developed to predict upper limb (UL) function early after stroke. However, assessment in the acute phase is not always possible. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic accuracy of the PREP2 when applied in a subacute neurorehabilitation setting. METHODS: This prospective longitudinal study included patients ≥18 years old with UL impairment following stroke. Patients were assessed in accordance with the PREP2 approach. However, 2 main components, the shoulder abduction finger extension (SAFE) score and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained 2 weeks poststroke. UL function at 3 months was predicted in 1 of 4 categories and compared with the actual outcome at 3 months as assessed by the Action Research Arm Test. The prediction accuracy of the PREP2 was quantified using the correct classification rate (CCR). RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were included. Overall CCR of the PREP2 was 60% (95% CI 50%-71%). Within the 4 categories, CCR ranged from the lowest value at 33% (95% CI 4%-85%) for the category Limited to the highest value at 78% (95% CI 43%-95%) for the category Poor. In the present study, the overall CCR was significantly lower (P < .001) than the 75% reported by the PREP2 developers. CONCLUSIONS: The low overall CCR makes PREP2 obtained 2 weeks poststroke unsuited for clinical implementation. However, PREP2 may be used to predict either excellent UL function in already well-recovered patients or poor UL function in patients with persistent severe UL paresis.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological/standards , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/therapy , Upper Extremity/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Severity of Illness Index , Stroke/physiopathology
8.
Neuroscience ; 448: 71-84, 2020 11 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32931847

ABSTRACT

Cutaneous laser stimulation is a proficient tool to investigate the function of the nociceptive system. However, variations in laser-skin interactions, causes by different skin anatomies and laser wavelength, affects the robustness of nociceptor activation. Thus, thoroughly understanding how the skin is heated by a laser pulse is important to characterize the thermal response properties of nociceptors. The study aim was to investigate how skin type and laser wavelength influences nociceptor activation during laser stimulation. Ten healthy subjects were exposed to brief CO2 (low skin penetrance) and Nd:YAP (high skin penetrance) laser stimuli delivered to the dorsum and palm of the hand, using three different intensities. Reaction times and perception intensities were recorded. A computational model simulated heat transfer in the skin and nociceptor activation in different skin types across different wavelengths and intensities. Intensity ratings were significantly lower and reaction-times significantly increased for CO2 laser stimuli in the palm compared to the dorsum. This was not the case for Nd:YAP laser stimuli. The computational model showed that these differences can be explained by the different skin absorption of CO2 and Nd:YAP lasers. For CO2 laser stimuli, the thicker stratum corneum of the glabrous skin reduces nociceptor activation, whereas the high penetrating Nd:YAP laser elicits a similar nociceptor activation, irrespective of skin type. Nociceptor activation during laser stimulation highly depends on skin composition and laser wavelength, especially for lasers having a low penetrance wavelength. A computational model showed that this difference could be explained primarily due to differences in skin composition.


Subject(s)
Nociceptors , Skin , Hand , Hot Temperature , Humans , Lasers
9.
J Neurophysiol ; 123(6): 2201-2208, 2020 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32347161

ABSTRACT

Nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) is a protective reaction to a noxious stimulus, resulting in withdrawal of the affected area and thus preventing potential tissue damage. This involuntary reaction consists of neural circuits, biomechanical strategies, and muscle activity that ensure an optimal withdrawal. Studies of lower limb NWR indicate that the amplitude of the NWR is highly modulated by extrinsic and intrinsic factors, such as stimulation site, intensity, frequency, and supraspinal activity, among others. Whether the predictability of the stimulus has an effect on the biomechanical strategies is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate how the predictability of impending noxious stimuli modulate the NWR reaction in the lower limb. NWR was evoked on fifteen healthy participants by trains of electrical stimuli on the sole of the foot and was measured in one distal (tibialis anterior) and one proximal (biceps femoris) muscle. The predictability was manipulated by giving participants prior information about the onset of the stimulus trains and the number of delivered stimuli per train. Results showed that the predictability of the incoming stimuli differentially modulates the muscle activity involved in the NWR reaction. For the most unpredictable stimulus train, larger NWR at distal muscles were evoked. Furthermore, the stereotyped temporal summation profile to repeated stimulation was observed when the stimulus train was completely predictable, while it was disrupted in proximal muscles in unpredictable conditions. It is inferred that the reflex response is shaped by descending control, which dynamically tunes the activity of the muscles involved in the resulting reaction.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Innate defensive behaviors such as reflexes are found across all species, constituting preprogrammed responses to external threats that are not anticipated. Previous studies indicated that the excitability of the reflex arcs like spinal nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) pathways in humans are modulated by several cognitive factors. This study assesses how the predictability of a threat affects the biomechanical pattern of the withdrawal response, showing that distal and proximal muscles are differentially modulated by descending control.


Subject(s)
Anticipation, Psychological/physiology , Foot/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Nociception/physiology , Reflex/physiology , Adult , Electric Stimulation , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
10.
Neuroscience ; 408: 259-271, 2019 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30999033

ABSTRACT

Human studies have repeatedly shown that conditioning pain modulation (CPM) exerts an overall descending inhibitory effect over spinal nociceptive activity. Previous studies have reported a reduction of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) under CPM. Still, how descending control influences the muscle activation patterns involved in this protective behavior remains unknown. This study aimed to characterize the effects of CPM on the withdrawal pattern assessed by a muscle synergy analysis of several muscles involved in the lower limb NWR. To trigger descending inhibition, CPM paradigm was applied using the cold-pressor test (CPT) as conditioning stimulus. Sixteen healthy volunteers participated. The NWR was evoked by electrical stimulation on the arch of the foot before, during and after the CPT. Electromyographic (EMG) activity of two proximal (rectus femoris and biceps femoris) and two distal (tibialis anterior and soleus) muscles was recorded. A muscle synergy analysis was performed on the decomposition of the EMG signals, based on a non-negative matrix factorization algorithm. Results showed that two synergies (Module I and II) were sufficient to describe the NWR pattern. Under CPM, Module I activation amplitude was significantly reduced in a narrow time-window interval (118-156 ms) mainly affecting distal muscles, whereas Module II activation amplitude was significantly reduced in a wider time-window interval (150-250 ms), predominantly affecting proximal muscles. These findings suggest that proximal muscles are largely under supraspinal control. The descending inhibitory drive exerted onto the spinal cord may adjust the withdrawal pattern by differential recruitment of the muscles involved in the protective behavior.


Subject(s)
Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Nociception/physiology , Pain Threshold/physiology , Pain/physiopathology , Reflex/physiology , Adult , Electric Stimulation , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Male , Pain Measurement , Young Adult
11.
Brain Topogr ; 31(4): 661-671, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29429136

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate whether cognitive processing for defining step precision during walking could induce changes in electrocortical activity. Ten healthy adults (21-36 years) were asked to walk overground in three different conditions: (1) normal walking in a straight path (NW); (2) walking in a pre-defined pathway forcing variation in step width and length by stepping on green marks on the floor (only one color: W1C), and (3) walking in the same pre-defined W1C pathway while evaluating different combinations among the colors green, yellow and red, in which only one color was the footfall target (evaluating two colors: W2C). Walking speed, stride duration and scalp electroencephalography (EEG) were recorded from all conditions. Event-related spectral perturbation was calculated for channels Fz, Cz, C3, C4, Pz and Oz in each condition, which were all time-normalized in relation to the gait cycle. The results showed that walking speed was reduced and stride duration was increased for W2C when compared to both NW and W1C (p < 0.01). Moreover, Event-related spectral perturbation analysis revealed significant changes (p < 0.05) during mid-stance in the frontal lobe and motor/sensorimotor regions, a phase in the gait cycle in which participants define the correct foot placement for the next step. These results suggest that greater cognitive demands during precision stepping influences electrocortical dynamics especially towards step transitions. Therefore, increased electrocortical activity in cognitive, motor and sensorimotor areas may be relevant to produce patterned and safe locomotion through challenging paths.


Subject(s)
Beta Rhythm/physiology , Brain/physiology , Cognition/physiology , Gait/physiology , Gamma Rhythm/physiology , Walking/physiology , Adult , Electroencephalography , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
12.
J Pain ; 18(11): 1313-1323, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28645867

ABSTRACT

The aim of this case-control study was to examine differences in neural correlates of pain facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms between acute low back pain (LBP) patients and healthy individuals. Pressure pain tolerance, electrical pain detection thresholds, pain ratings to repetitive suprathreshold electrical stimulation (SES) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) were assessed in 18 patients with acute LBP and 18 healthy control participants. Furthermore, event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to repetitive SES were obtained from high-density electroencephalography. Results showed that the LBP group presented lower pressure pain tolerance and higher pain ratings to SES compared with the control group. Both groups displayed effective CPM, with no differences in CPM magnitude between groups. Both groups presented similar reductions in ERP amplitudes during CPM, but ERP responses to repetitive SES were significantly larger in the LBP group. In conclusion, acute LBP patients presented enhanced pain facilitatory mechanisms, whereas no significant changes in pain inhibitory mechanisms were observed. These results provide new insight into the central mechanisms underlying acute LBP. PERSPECTIVE: This article present evidence that acute LBP patients show enhanced pain facilitation and unaltered pain inhibition compared with pain-free volunteers. These results provide new insight into the central mechanisms underlying acute LBP.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/physiopathology , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Adult , Brain/physiopathology , Case-Control Studies , Electric Stimulation , Electroencephalography , Evoked Potentials , Humans , Pain Measurement , Pain Threshold , Pressure , Psychophysics
13.
PLoS One ; 10(8): e0134127, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26258532

ABSTRACT

The agreement between humans and algorithms on whether an event-related potential (ERP) is present or not and the level of variation in the estimated values of its relevant features are largely unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the categorical and quantitative agreement between manual and automated methods for single-trial detection and estimation of ERP features. To this end, ERPs were elicited in sixteen healthy volunteers using electrical stimulation at graded intensities below and above the nociceptive withdrawal reflex threshold. Presence/absence of an ERP peak (categorical outcome) and its amplitude and latency (quantitative outcome) in each single-trial were evaluated independently by two human observers and two automated algorithms taken from existing literature. Categorical agreement was assessed using percentage positive and negative agreement and Cohen's κ, whereas quantitative agreement was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis and the coefficient of variation. Typical values for the categorical agreement between manual and automated methods were derived, as well as reference values for the average and maximum differences that can be expected if one method is used instead of the others. Results showed that the human observers presented the highest categorical and quantitative agreement, and there were significantly large differences between detection and estimation of quantitative features among methods. In conclusion, substantial care should be taken in the selection of the detection/estimation approach, since factors like stimulation intensity and expected number of trials with/without response can play a significant role in the outcome of a study.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Automation , Evoked Potentials , Adult , Electric Stimulation , Electroencephalography , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Reference Values , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Young Adult
14.
J Neurosci Methods ; 240: 1-12, 2015 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25455345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To date, few studies have combined the simultaneous acquisition of nociceptive withdrawal reflexes (NWR) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). In fact, it is unknown whether the combination of these two signals acquired simultaneously could provide additional information on somatosensory processing at spinal and supraspinal level compared to individual NWR and SEP signals. NEW METHOD: By using the concept of mutual information (MI), it is possible to quantify the relation between electrical stimuli and simultaneous elicited electrophysiological responses in humans based on the estimated stimulus-response signal probability distributions. RESULTS: All selected features from NWR and SEPs were informative in regard to the stimulus when considered individually. Specifically, the information carried by NWR features was significantly higher than the information contained in the SEP features (p<0.05). Moreover, the joint information carried by the combination of features showed an overall redundancy compared to the sum of the individual contributions. Comparison with existing methods MI can be used to quantify the information that single-trial NWR and SEP features convey, as well as the information carried jointly by NWR and SEPs. This is a model-free approach that considers linear and non-linear correlations at any order and is not constrained by parametric assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: The current study introduces a novel approach that allows the quantification of the individual and joint information content of single-trial NWR and SEP features. This methodology could be used to decode and interpret spinal and supraspinal interaction in studies modulating the responsiveness of the nociceptive system.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Information Theory , Nociceptive Pain/physiopathology , Reflex/physiology , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Brain/physiopathology , Computer Simulation , Electric Stimulation/methods , Electroencephalography/methods , Electromyography/methods , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Models, Neurological , Monte Carlo Method , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Nociception/physiology , Nonlinear Dynamics , Spinal Cord/physiopathology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...