Predicting caregiving status and caregivers' burden in multiple sclerosis. A short report.

OBJECTIVES: Predicting caregiving status (CS) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is of both clinical and health policy-making value. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the clinical predictors of CS, along with factors related to caregivers' stress. METHODS: A sample of 342 clinically definite MS patients (67.5% females, 67.8% relapsing MS, mean age 43.1 ± 11.4 year-old, mean disease duration 147 ± 105.4 months, median Expanded Disability Status Scale -EDSS-3.0) was screened for CS. The Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 and Zarit Burden Interview were used to measure quality of patients' life and the their caregivers' burden, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 57.9% of patients reported at least one caregiver, 97% of which were relatives or friends. Higher EDSS was associated with higher chance of reporting a caregiver. Two EDSS cut-offs were recognized; 2.0 and 4.5, the former with increased sensitivity (78.8%) and the latter with increased specificity (82.3%) to predict CS. Patients in the mild disability group (EDSS: 0-1.5) needing a caregiver had higher subjective cognitive function, implying presumably a beneficial role of care in cognition. Age and education were showed to affect CS in the moderate disability group (EDSS: 2.0-4.5). Physical and mental disability was more pronounced in patients reporting at least one caregiver in the high disability group (EDSS above 4.5). Caregivers' stress was significantly positively correlated with age, EDSS, and duration of the disease and negatively with cognitive, physical, and mental health. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, the clinical predictors of CS are known to serve well both the researchers and the clinicians.

Determinants of stigma in a cohort of hellenic patients suffering from multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from several neurologic disorders may bear the "stigma" of their disease, being disqualified from full social acceptance. Although stigma is considered to be present in Multiple Sclerosis (MS), the factors that influence its levels are ambiguous. Aim of our study was to examine, for the first time in the literature, the basic determinants of stigma in a Hellenic MS-patients cohort, as well as how stigma affects their Quality-of-Life (QoL) profiles. METHODS: Three hundred forty two patients were recruited in this study. Data collected concerned sociodemographic and disease-related variables, mental illness assessment, Multiple-Sclerosis-QoL-54 (MSQoL-54) and Stigma-Scale-for-Chronic-Illness-24 (SSCI-24) questionnaires. Potential determinants were evaluated with univariate statistical analyses for their contribution to total, internalized (inner-self derived) and externalized (society derived) stigma. Important findings were further evaluated on hierarchical regression models. RESULTS: Disability levels were found to be the most powerful predictor in all stigma categories, followed by the presence of mental illness. Working and caregiving status were also ascertained as determinants of internalized stigma. Stigma levels displayed strong negative correlation with all composites of MSQoL-54. CONCLUSIONS: Stigma is present in the social environment of MS patients and was confirmed as a barrier (according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health), with detrimental effects on their QoL levels and functioning performances. Disability and mental illness were shown as the principal determinants of stigma, while financial characteristics were not as equally involved. Further validation of these results in other MS populations may provide safer conclusions, towards more efficacious patient-centered care outcomes.