Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 30(9): 1877-83, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22795408

ABSTRACT

Neuropathic pain has been poorly investigated in the emergency department, although it is known to be less sensitive to opioids than other forms of pain. We tested the hypothesis that morphine requirements are increased in patients having severe pain classified as neuropathic using the DN4 score. We included adult patients with acute severe pain (visual analog scale ≥ 70), assessed using the DN4 score, and treated with intravenous morphine titration (bolus of 2 or 3 mg [body weight >60 kg] with 5-minute intervals between each bolus). Pain relief was defined as a visual analog scale 30 or less. Patients were divided into 2 groups: control group (DN4 score <4) and neuropathic pain group (DN4 score ≥ 4). The main outcome was the total dose of morphine administered. Data are mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). Among the 239 patients included (mean age, 43+14 years), 35 patients (15%) had a DN4 score 4 or more. The main characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in morphine dose (0.16+0.09 vs 0.17+0.11 mg/kg, P=.32), number of boluses administered (3.5 [3-5] vs 3 [3-6], P=.97), proportion of patients with pain relief (75 vs 83%, P=.39), or morphine-related adverse effects (11% vs 3%, P=.14). In conclusion, morphine consumption was not significantly modified in patients having severe pain classified as neuropathic using the DN4 score as compared with a control group, suggesting that specific detection of neuropathic pain may not be useful in the emergency department.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Morphine/therapeutic use , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Pain Measurement , Acute Pain/classification , Acute Pain/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morphine/administration & dosage , Neuralgia/etiology , Pain Measurement/methods , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 30(9): 1872-6, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22795407

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure (PtcCO(2)) has been suggested as a noninvasive surrogate of arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO(2)). Our study evaluates the reliability of this method in spontaneously breathing patients in an emergency department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, observational study was performed in nonintubated dyspneic patients who required measurement of arterial blood gases. Simultaneously and blindly to the physicians in charge, PtcCO(2) was measured using a TOSCA 500 monitor (Radiometer, Villeurbanne, France). Agreement between PaCO(2) and PtcCO(2) was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (mean age, 65 years) were included, and 50 measurements were done. Eleven (23%) had acute heart failure; 10 (21%), pneumonia; 7 (15%), acute asthma; and 7 (15%), exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Median PaCO(2) was 42 mm Hg (range, 17-109). Mean difference between PaCO(2) and PtcCO(2) was 1 mm Hg with 95% limits of agreement of -3.4 to +5.6 mm Hg. All measurement differences were within 5 mm Hg, and 32 (64%) were within 2 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: Transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure accurately predicts PaCO(2) in spontaneously breathing patients.


Subject(s)
Carbon Dioxide/blood , Emergency Service, Hospital , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arteries , Blood Gas Monitoring, Transcutaneous , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oximetry , Partial Pressure , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 26(7): 742-9, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18774036

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to analyze the effect of age on management and prognosis of stroke. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in consecutive patients admitted to an emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of stroke. Comparison according to age (< 75 vs > or = 75 years old) was done, with a 1-year follow-up including autonomy and outcome. RESULTS: In older patients, brain magnetic resonance imaging (6% vs 27%, P < .001) and immediate referral to the stroke unit were less frequent (6% vs 28%, P < .001); median length of stay was longer (11 vs 8 days, P = .007); and in-hospital mortality tended to be higher (12% vs 6%, not significant). After discharge, 1-year mortality was higher (27% vs 14%, P = .004). In a multivariate analysis, severity of stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and dementia were independent positive predictors of 1-year mortality, whereas age was not. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that age was not an independent predictor when stroke severity was considered, our data suggest differences in the management of elderly compared with younger stroke patients admitted to the ED.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Stroke/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Stroke/classification , Stroke/diagnosis
4.
Presse Med ; 35(1 Pt 1): 45-50, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16462663

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Abciximab, a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, administered in conjunction with primary coronary stenting, improves the outcome of acute myocardial infarction, and the earlier it is administered, the greater the improvement. We sought to assess the feasibility of early administration of abciximab in the emergency room (ER) before primary coronary stenting and compare our results with those of a group of patients treated in the prehospital (ambulance) phase. METHODS: Data and outcome of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who received abciximab (0.25 mg x kg(-1) then 0.125 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) in the ER before primary coronary stenting were compared with those of patients who received abciximab in the prehospital phase. RESULTS: Characteristics of the group treated in the ER did not differ significantly from those of patients treated before arrival at the hospital, except for prevalence of diabetes (22 versus 5%, p<0.05) and administration of analgesic to control chest pain (22 versus 65%, p<0.05). Nor did the median time between onset of pain and abciximab administration differ significantly different (120 versus 160 min, NS). In contrast, the median delay between the beginning of abciximab administration and insertion of the cardiac catheter was significantly shorter in the ER group (35 versus 55 min, p<0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in TIMI flow grade before or after revascularization, specific revascularization performed, or outcome. CONCLUSION: Our study provides some evidence that early administration of abciximab in the ER is safe, feasible, and justified by the delay required for coronary revascularization.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Electrocardiography , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments/administration & dosage , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Abciximab , Aged , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Diabetes Complications , Emergency Service, Hospital , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Myocardial Revascularization , Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex/antagonists & inhibitors , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Safety , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...