ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The tumor response of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing locoregional treatment (TLR) before liver transplantation can be evaluated using different imaging tests. The aim of this study was to compare the correlation of radiological response evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs computed tomography (CT) vs ultrasound with histopathological findings. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was performed. Data of patients undergoing Liver transplantation due to HCC between January 2010 and December were collected, selecting patients who underwent TLR. RESULTS: Four hundred and four patients were transplanted, of whom 103 (25.5%) had HCC. Ninety-seven patients (93.2%) received TLR. Eighty-eight of these patients (90.7%) underwent a reevaluation imaging test: 8 (8.2%) underwent ultrasound, 68 (70.1%) underwent MRI, and 12 (12.4%) underwent CT. Of the 88 patients, 59% were classified as nonviable LR-TR (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Treatment Response), 32.5% as viable LR-TR, and the rest (8.5%) as equivocal LR-TR. Regarding the correlation of the degree of radiological response according to each imaging test, ultrasound categorized 62.5% as nonviable LR-TR vs 60.6% by MRI vs 44.4% by CT, with these differences not being significant (P = .779). Regarding the correlation of patients classified as nonviable LR-TR by each test and total tumor necrosis in histopathology, both MRI and ultrasound correctly classified 60% of complete necrosis as nonviable LR-TR, and in the case of CT, it was 50%, with these differences not being significant (P = 1). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound and CT have obtained similar results as reevaluation tests to MRI, which could replace it in case of unavailability of the latter.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Liver Transplantation , Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Necrosis , Contrast Media , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The development of new direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment has reduced the indications for liver transplantation (LT). We analyzed the indications, characteristics, and evolution of patients with HCV infection who were treated with DAA-based therapies and who underwent LT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was performed. Data were collected of patients undergoing LT owing to HCV infection between January 2016 and August 2020. Overall characteristics of the patients were analyzed and divided into 2 groups according to the indication for LT: hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Differences between biliary and vascular complications after surgery and survival time were compared. RESULTS: Of 156 LTs, 33 (22%) were performed in patients with HCV infection in this period, which shows a decrease of nearly 16% when comparing this period with the interferon/ribavirin era. Indications for LT were 56.7% in patients with HCC and 43.3% in patients with DC. After DAA treatment, all patients developed a sustained viral response. Mean age of the global series, HCC group, and DC group were 56.9, 58.71, and 54.4 years, respectively (P = .041); 53.8% of the HCV-DC group initiated DAA treatment by the time to be included at the waiting list, compared with 17.6% of HCV-HCC group (P = .045). There were no statistically significant differences in terms of survival or biliary and vascular complications after LT. CONCLUSION: Patients with HCV are still part of the waiting list, mainly because of HCC. No statistical differences were shown in terms of postoperative complications or survival. Studies with a higher number of patients are needed.
