Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Vet Sci ; 9(6)2022 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35737321

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic-resistant bacteria can circulate among human and animal populations through direct contact with animals, as well as via food and the environment. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence and characterisation of multiresistant bacteria in pig samples. METHODS: 224 samples of pig livestock were taken at the slaughterhouse on the island of Tenerife. A nasal and a rectal sample were collected from each pig. The presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus coagulase-negative (MRCoNS), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (BLEE), carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), and colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae was investigated. The resistance genes of the isolated bacteria were characterised by specific PCRs depending on the microorganism to be studied, and in vitro antimicrobial resistance was determined using the broth microdilution method (Vitek®2 system bioMérieux®, Nurtingen, Germany). RESULTS: MRSA prevalence was 73.21% (164 isolates). MRCoNS prevalence was 9.8% (22 isolates), S. sciuri being the prevalent species. Six isolates presented a 2.7% prevalence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (BLEE) in the CTX-M-1 group. No vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), or colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were isolated. CONCLUSION: we found a high presence of multiresistant bacteria, suggesting the need for increased control and surveillance of this type of strains in pig livestock and a better understanding of the possible transmission routes of these microorganisms through livestock products.

2.
Enferm. glob ; 18(56): 529-541, oct. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-188281

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Conocemos como una persona trans a aquella que no se identifica con el sexo de nacimiento, este hecho aún recogido como patología por el actual manual diagnóstico y estadístico de enfermedades mentales (DSM-V) va a provocar que existan desigualdades y barreras significativas a la hora de la atención sanitaria. Objetivo: Explorar las dificultades para la asistencia sanitaria percibidas por las personas trans y por los profesionales que los atienden en centros sanitarios. Material y método: Revisión de la literatura. Resultados: Tanto los profesionales como las personas trans perciben barreras significativas. Se podrían agrupar en diversos temas: desigualdades en la atención sanitaria percibidas por los pacientes trans, prejuicios y discriminación sentida, riesgos específicos de salud, déficit de conocimientos de los profesionales y déficit de formación en los planes de estudio actuales. Por otro lado, enfermería ante los pacientes trans puede resultar un facilitador. Conclusiones: Existen numerosos factores que pueden ser modificables y que provocan que las personas trans no perciban una asistencia adecuada. La adecuada formación de los profesionales sanitarios es uno de los que adquiere mayor relevancia Los resultados encontrados aportan una información clave para el futuro diseño de intervenciones dirigidas a mejorar la calidad de la asistencia en este colectivo


Introduction: We know as a transgender person who is not identified with the sex of birth, this fact still collected as pathology by the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illness (DSM-V) will cause inequalities and barriers At the time of health care. Objective: To explore the difficulties for health care perceived by trans people and by the professionals who assist them in health centres. Material and method: Literature review. Results: Both professionals and trans people perceive significant barriers. They could be grouped by diverse topics: healthcare inequalities noticed by trans patients, prejudices and felt discrimination, specific health risks, lack of professional knowledge and deficit of training in current curricula. On the other hand, nursing with trans patients may result in a facilitator. Conclusions: There are multiple factors which can be modified and which produce that trans people do not notice appropriate care. Appropriate training of health professionals is the one which acquires more relevance. The results found provide key information for the future design of interventions aimed at improving the quality of the assistance in this group


Subject(s)
Humans , Health Services for Transgender Persons/organization & administration , Education, Nursing, Continuing/trends , Comprehensive Health Care/organization & administration , Culturally Competent Care/organization & administration , Gender Dysphoria/nursing , Gender Diversity , 57362 , 17627
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...