Initial Antifungal Strategy Reduces Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Candidemia: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis of a Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the empirical therapy with fluconazole or an echinocandin on 30- and 90-day mortality in critically ill patients with candidemia. The outcome of patients in whom the empirical echinocandin was deescalated to fluconazole was also assessed. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational multicenter study. SETTING: Medical and surgical ICUs in nine Spanish hospitals. PATIENTS: Adult patients (≥ 18 yr) with an episode of Candida bloodstream infection during ICU admission from January 2011 to April 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Patient characteristics, infection-related variables, therapeutic interventions, and metastatic complications were reviewed. A propensity score-adjusted multivariable analysis was performed to identify the risk factors significantly associated with 30-day and 90-day mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 294 patients were diagnosed of candidemia in the participant ICUs. Sixty patients were excluded (other antifungals in the primary therapy or the patient died without empirical antifungal therapy). The study group comprised 115 patients who received fluconazole (30-day mortality, 37.4%) and 119 patients treated empirically with an echinocandin (30-day mortality, 31.9%). The use of an echinocandin in the empirical therapy was a protective factor for 30-day (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.66; p = 0.002) and 90-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.93; p = 0.014) in the propensity score- adjusted multivariable analysis. Deescalation of the empirical echinocandin to fluconazole was not associated with a higher mortality or the occurrence of long-term complications. CONCLUSIONS: Empirical use of an echinocandin in critically ill patients with documented candidemia reduces mortality at 30 and 90 days significantly. Deescalation of the empirical echinocandin to fluconazole is safe and effective in fluconazole-susceptible infections.

A comparison of the effect of convection against diffusion in hemodynamics and cytokines clearance in an experimental model of septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Replacement therapies based on the use of convection have value for the removal of inflammatory mediators. Such therapies have been proposed for the management of septic shock, but diffusion has not proved useful in this scenario, unless high-flow membranes are used. The exact role of diffusion in these cases remains to be clarified because continuous replacement therapies are usually delivered with low-flow membranes and mixed convection-diffusion modalities. However, studies specifically addressing this problem have not been performed. Our aim was to define the efficacy of hemofiltration (convection) and hemodialysis (diffusion) in cytokine clearance and hemodynamic improvement in an experimental model of septic shock. METHODS: Shock was induced in 15 beagle dogs (weight 10-15 kg) by infusion of 1 mg/kg of ultrapure Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide diluted in 20 mL saline for 10 minutes. Five animals were followed without interventions (controls), five animals were treated with convection (100 mL kg h) for 6 hours, and five animals were treated with diffusion (100 mL kg h) for 6 hours. RESULTS: All subjects in the control group died during the study, whereas all treated subjects survived. Mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, systolic variability volume, systemic vascular resistances, dPMax, and pulmonary compliance improved in treated subjects. However, the differences in mean arterial pressure and cardiac output were significant only in the convection group and not in the diffusion-treated group.Tumor necrosis factor α rose equally in all groups and decreased only in treated subjects. Interleukin 6 rose in the three groups but decreased only in the convection group and remained unchanged in the control and diffusion groups. CONCLUSION: Convection and diffusion improved survival and hemodynamic parameters in a septic shock model. Improvement was more pronounced with convection, a difference that may be explained by convective clearance of cytokines.