ABSTRACT
BackgroundPatients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), specifically those treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologics are at high risk for vaccine preventable infections. Their ability to mount adequate vaccine responses is unclear. Aimto assess immune responses to mRNA-COVID-19 vaccine, and safety profile, in patients with IBD stratified according to therapy, compared to healthy controls (HC). MethodsProspective, controlled, multi-center Israeli study. Subjects enrolled received two BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) doses. Anti-spike (S) antibodies levels and functional activity, anti-TNF levels and adverse events (AEs) were detected longitudinaly. ResultsOverall 258 subjects: 185 IBD (67 treated with anti-TNF), and 73 HC. After the first vaccine dose all HC were seropositive, while some patients with IBD, regardless of treatment, remained seronegative. After the second dose all subjects were seropositive, however anti-S levels were significantly lower in anti-TNF treated compared to untreated patients, and HC (p<0.001; p<0.001, respectively). Neutralizing and inhibitory functions were both lower in anti-TNF treated compared to untreated patients, and HC (p<0.03; p<0.0001, respectively). Anti-TNF drug levels and vaccine responses did not affect anti-S levels. Infection rate ([~]2%) and AEs were comparable in all groups. IBD activity did not change in response to BNT162b2. ConclusionsIn this prospective study in patients with IBD stratified according to treatment all patients mounted an immune response to two doses of BNT162b2. However, its magnitude was significantly lower in patients treated with anti-TNF, regardless of administration timing and drug levels. Vaccine was safe. As vaccine immune response longevity in this group may be limited, vaccine booster dose should be considered.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab is effective in Crohn's disease. However, a substantial proportion of patients will not respond or lose response to ustekinumab. The current evidence to support the effectiveness of dose-optimisation for ustekinumab nonresponse is limited. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of dose escalation of ustekinumab. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. We included active Crohn's disease patients who received a standard-dose intravenous induction and at least one subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg dose. All enrolled patients received dose escalation by either shortening the interval between the doses to every 4 or 6 weeks, intravenous reinduction or a combination of strategies. The primary outcome of the study was clinical response at week 16 after dose escalation. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients (22 centres/14 countries) were included. The patients were dose-escalated after a median treatment duration of 30 weeks. At week 16 from escalation, 73/142 (51.4%) responded to treatment, including 55/142 (38.7%) in clinical remission. Corticosteroid-free remission was achieved in 6/34 (17.6%) patients on corticosteroids at the time of escalation; 118/142 (83%) continued treatment beyond week 16. Follow-up data beyond week 16 were available for 74/118 (62.7%) patients. On the last follow-up, 51/98 (52%) patients with available data responded to treatment, including 41/98 (42%) in clinical remission. CONCLUSIONS: Intensification of ustekinumab maintenance dosage was effective in over 50% of the patients. This strategy should be considered in patients who are nonresponsive to every 8 weeks ustekinumab maintenance dosing.
