Is surgery beneficial for patients with concurrent multiple sclerosis and degenerative cervical myelopathy? A review of literature.

Introduction: Due to an overlap in symptoms, there is significant delay in surgical treatment of patients that have concomitant multiple sclerosis (MS) and degenerative cervical Myelopathy (DCM). The purpose of this review is to evaluate if surgical intervention is beneficial to patients that have concurrent presentations. Research question: Is surgery beneficial in concurrent MS and DCM? Materials and methods: A literature search with no date restrictions was conducted on Pubmed and Medline databases. Keywords searched: Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, Multiple sclerosis, Treatment, Surgery, Quality of Life. Randomised controlled trials, prospective, retrospective, and case series reporting timing of surgery, post-operative outcomes such as improvement in myelopathic symptoms, quality of life, and any serious complications were included. Results: The literature search yielded a total of 8 studies across all databases. Seven articles were selected for full text review, and all of them were sectioned for inclusion in this review. Seven studies evaluated 160 participants with concurrent multiple sclerosis and degenerative cervical myelopathy. Earlier studies had discouraged performing surgery in this subset of patients, the majority of studies found it worthwhile to perform early surgery for patients with concomitant multiple sclerosis and degenerative cord compression, if the patients had radiculopathy. Quality of life for MS patients did not improve as much as it did for patients that did not have MS. Discussion and conclusion: Patients with radiculopathy, neck pain and cord compression are most likely to benefit from early surgery. There is no need for delaying to offer surgery unless other medical/anaesthetic contraindications exist.

Sexual discrimination in neurosurgery: a questionnaire-based nationwide study amongst women neurosurgeons in Bulgaria.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this qualitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study was to identify potential factors influencing the progression of female neurosurgeons in Bulgaria. METHODS: The study was conducted nationally, by sending out an online (SurveyMonkey®) questionnaire with 30 questions over a 3-month period to 15 registered female neurosurgeons in practice including residents/trainees and specialists from state universities, private universities and regional hospitals in Bulgaria. The questionnaire covered basic demographics, level of academic achievement and aspects of personal and professional experience, along with questions on the perceived barriers that female neurosurgeons nationally encountered during their clinical and academic career. These results were compared with similar studies conducted in other countries following a literature search on PubMed. RESULTS: Eleven out of fifteen respondents returned the completed survey, covering 10 institutions which included 8 university clinics and two regional clinics, achieving a response rate of 73.3%. No questionnaires were excluded. The factors negatively influencing the clinical and academic professional development and progression in the field included lack of mentors and other female role models, perceived bias regarding remuneration and leave, as well as a lack of support with regards to work-life balance and difficulty progressing in the academic fields. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is an ever increasing and growing awareness of the factors negatively impacting women progression in neurosurgery worldwide, there are still significant gaps and biases that hinder career progression amongst female neurosurgical communities and highlight a need for potential practices to be established in the workplace to counteract this.

Fusion rates for conservative and surgical management of type II odontoid fractures and its impact.

BACKGROUND: Type II odontoid fractures are known to have low fusion rates following conservative management with a hard collar. However, most patients are elderly with comorbidities and are not fit for surgery. The present study identified the rates of bony fusion, complications, and clinical outcomes following conservative management of type II odontoid fractures. METHODS: We included consecutive patients referred with a suspected odontoid fracture to a Major Trauma Centre in the UK between March 2015 and December 2017. Data including patient demographics, fracture management, complications and outcomes. Bony fusion was assessed by two neurosurgeons and one neuroradiologists. Results were analysed with simple statistics and chi-squared test. RESULTS: 102 patients were included in the study (mean age = 80.4 ± 15.3). 10 (9.8%) were managed surgically and 92 (90.2%) were managed conservatively with a hard collar, for a mean of 87 days. Patients were followed up for a mean of 28.1 months (range 1-855 days) until discharge. 37% developed collar complications, namely pain, stiffness and non-tolerance. Bony union was achieved in 37.3% of patients treated with a hard collar (versus 80% in the surgical group, p = 0.0096). Increasing age was an independent risk factor for non-union (p < 0.001). Of the patients without bony union, none reported symptoms, and 90% were discharged without a collar. CONCLUSION: The management of type II odontoid fractures are difficult in an elderly, co-morbid population. With conservative management fusion rates are low, and collar complications are not insignificant. However, outcomes are good regardless of union.

Minimising radiation exposure to the surgeon in minimally invasive spine surgeries: A systematic review of 15 studies.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative imaging in minimally invasive spinal surgeries is associated with significant radiation exposure to surgeons, which overtime can lead to serious health hazards including malignancy. In this study, the authors conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of navigation assisted fluoroscopy methods on radiation exposure to the surgeon in minimally invasive spine surgeries, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy/percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy versus minimally invasive spine transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PELD/PETD versus MIS-TLIF). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PUBMED/MEDLINE on 20th July, 2020. Inclusion criteria were applied according to study design, surgical technique, spinal region, and language. Data extracted included lumbar segment, average operation time (min), fluoroscopic time (s), and radiation dose (µSV), efficacy of modified navigation versus conventional techniques; on reducing operation, fluoroscopy times and effective radiation dose. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (ten prospectives, and five retrospectives) were included for quantitative analysis. PELD recorded a shorter operation time (by 126.3min, p<0.001) and fluoroscopic time (by 22.9s, p=0.3) than MIS-TLIF. The highest radiation dose/case (µSV) for both techniques were recorded at the surgeon's: finger, chest, neck and eye. The effective dose for MIS-TLIF was 30µSV higher than PELD. Modified navigation techniques recorded a shorter operation time (by 15.9min, p=0.3); fluoroscopy time (by 289.8s, p=0.3); effective radiation dose (by 169.5µSV, p=0.3) than conventional fluoroscopy methods. DISCUSSION: This systematic literature review showed that although navigation assisted fluoroscopy techniques are superior to conventional methods in minimising radiation exposure, lack of statistical significance warrants future randomised controlled trials, to solidify their efficacy in reducing radiation related hazards.

Indications for Nonsurgical Treatment of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Thoracolumbar spine is the most injured spinal region in blunt trauma. Literature on the indications for nonoperative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures is conflicting. The purpose of this systematic review is to clarify the indications for nonsurgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. We conducted a systematic literature search between 2010 to 2020 on PubMed/MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central. Up-to-date literature on the indications for nonoperative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures was reviewed to reach an agreement in a consensus meeting of WFNS (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies) Spine Committee. The statements were voted and reached a positive or negative consensus using the Delphi method. For all of the questions discussed, the literature search yielded 1,264 studies, from which 54 articles were selected for full-text review. Nine studies (4 trials, and 5 retrospective) evaluating 759 participants with thoracolumbar fractures who underwent nonoperative/surgery were included. Although, compression type and stable burst fractures can be managed conservatively, if there is major vertebral body damage, kyphotic angulation, neurological deficit, spinal canal compromise, surgery may be indicated. AO type B, C fractures are preferably treated surgically. Future research is necessary to tackle the relative paucity of evidence pertaining to patients with thoracolumbar fractures.

Is fusion the most suitable treatment option for recurrent lumbar disc herniation? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) is a common issue after primary discectomy and can cause severe pain, morbidity, and reoperation. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the surgical management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using Pubmed and Embase databases on 18thAugust, 2019. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied according to study design, surgical approach, language, number of patients; and spinal level. Data extracted included patient demographics, and clinical outcomes (patients with excellent/good outcomes; VAS back and leg score improvement, complication and recurrence rates). RESULTS: Sixteen studies, (comprising of seven prospective and nine retrospective) met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies evaluated discectomy only; four analysed fusion, and two analysed both discectomy only and fusion approaches. Fusion approaches recorded a superior success rate (8.3 % higher, p>0.05); postoperative VAS back score improvement (5 % higher, p>0.05) than discectomy alone.  However, discectomy alone approaches recorded a more favourable postoperative VAS leg score improvement (4.2 % higher p>0.05), and complication rate (3.2% lower, p>0.05) than fusion techniques. CONCLUSION: There is significant heterogeneity in clinical outcomes reported for studies after surgical intervention in rLDH patients. Neither discectomy nor fusion's superiority was statistically significant. Despite fusion yielding longer operative times, and length of stay (adding to the expense), it is superior in minimising mechanical instability and recurrence. Finally, we conclude that both approaches are equally efficacious in rLDH cases, and choice should be based on a case by case basis.

A fatal case of Rosai-Dorfman disease.

As Rosai-Dorfman Disease presents generally nonspecific symptoms, differential diagnosis can be of great learning curve for physicians. Additionally, RDD does not usually threaten life and spontaneous remission is frequently observed. However, unusually in our case the patient passed away within 1 month of confirmed diagnosis.