Effect of high voltage electrical stimulation in temporomandibular disorders: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of high voltage electrical stimulation (HVES) on pain intensity, maximum mouth opening (MMO), cervical mobility, head position, pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), bite force, joint sounds, and jaw muscle strength in individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). METHODS: Thirty-four individuals with TMDs were randomly divided into the exercise group (EG) (n = 17) and the HVES group (HG) (n = 17). For 4 weeks, EG received exercise therapy alone, while HG received HVES (12 sessions in total, 3 days a week to anterior temporalis and masseter) in conjunction with exercise. RESULTS: After the treatment, in both groups, pain intensity significantly decreased (p < .001); MMO (7.27 mm in HG and 3.61 mm in EG), cervical mobility, head position, PPTs, bite force, and jaw muscle strength significantly increased (p = .043 to < .001). Joint sounds significantly decreased in the HG (p = .008). Left bite force (p = .040) and left medial pterygoid PPT (p = .013) increased more in EG. The change in left bite force in EG over time was significant (p = .040; ηp2 = .126). The effect sizes of treatments were medium to large (from .527 to 1.602) for the evaluated parameters. CONCLUSION: Although exercise alone was effective in many parameters evaluated, additional application of HVES provided further improvement for pain, MMO, cervical mobility, PPTs, jaw muscle strength and joint sounds. HVES can be routinely used in clinics for individuals with TMDs.

Psychometric properties of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) for temporomandibular disorders: Turkish version, responsiveness, reliability, and validity study.

PURPOSE: Many assessment tools have been proposed for use in clinical practice and research on individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). It aimed to translate the Fonseca Anamnestic Index into Turkish (FAI/T) and examine the responsiveness, reliability and validity of the FAI/T in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine individuals (207 female/42 male) with TMD were included in this study according to the RDC/TMD (muscle disorders, disc displacement, arthralgia and mixed disorders (muscle disorders and disc displacement)). Reliability was evaluated with test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and reproducibility. Validity was assessed with structural validity, construct validity, content validity, and face validity. In addition, responsiveness and floor and ceiling effects were also examined. RESULTS: The ICC value (0.906) and Cronbach's α (0.951) of the (FAI/T) were excellent. Following Explarotary Factor Analysis, two factors were extracted, accounting for 51.859% of the total variation. Structural validity, construct validity, content validity, and face validity analyses proved the validity of the FAI/T. The responsiveness analysis showed that the Turkish FAI and its subscales were able to detect change over time. CONCLUSIONS: The FAI/T has shown excellent reliability and good validity. The FAI/T can assess the symptoms of Turkish-speaking persons with TMD.Clinical Trials registration number: NCT04274985.

Turkish version of Fonseca Anamnestic Index has been translated into Turkish from English version.Turkish version of Fonseca Anamnestic Index has excellent reliability and good validity.The Turkish version of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index and its subscales are able to detect change over time.Turkish clinicians and researchers could easily use the Turkish version of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index to assess the Turkish population with temporomandibular disorders.

The Effect of OnabotulinumtoxinA on Headache Intensity and Number of Monthly Headache Days in Individuals with Chronic Migraine with Different Levels of Neck Disability.

One of the treatment methods used in chronic migraine is OnabotulinumtoxinA. The effects of OnabotulinumtoxinA on headache intensity (HI) and number of monthly headache days (NMHD) in chronic migraine (CM) patients classified according to neck disability levels are unknown. Our aim was to investigate the effect of OnabotulinumtoxinA on the HI and the NMHD in individuals with CM with different levels of neck disability. One hundred sixteen patients were enrolled in the study. The OnabotulinumtoxinA protocol was administered as per Follow-the-Pain PREEMPT. The Neck Disability Index was used to evaluate neck disability. Primary outcome measures were headache intensity, assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale, and the number of monthly headache days recorded from patients' diaries. Secondary outcome measures were migraine disability, assessed with the Migraine Disability Assessment Test, and quality-of-life, assessed with the Headache Impact Test-6. All assessments were made at baseline and end of the treatment. The OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment showed a greater improvement effect in the number of monthly headache days (p = 0.000) and migraine disability (p = 0.000) parameters in the severe and complete disability groups. CM patients with complete and severe neck disability received the most benefit in reducing the NMHD at 3 months after OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment, but the HI decreased at a similar level in all neck disability groups.

The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Approaches in Chronic Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacological treatment is the primary approach in chronic migraine (CM), although non-drug interventions such as physical therapy are used as adjunct treatments. We aimed to review the efficacy of physical therapy and rehabilitation approaches for CM and their impact on quality of life (QoL) and disability. METHODS: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with CM. The primary outcomes were changes in intensity, frequency, duration of headache, disability, and QoL. Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Data synthesis and quantitative analysis were conducted on relevant studies. RESULTS: Seven RCTs were included in the narrative review, and five of them were eligible for quantitative analysis. Aerobic exercise (AE), osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), occipital transcutaneous electrical stimulation (OTES), acupressure, hydrotherapy, instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM), facial proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (FPNF), and connective tissue massage (CTM) were used in CM. AE combined with pharmacological therapy reduced the frequency, duration, and intensity of headache. OMT combined with medication improved QoL and reduced disability, intensity of pain, and migraine days per month. Hydrotherapy combined with medication also resulted in improvements in the intensity of headache, frequency, and overall QoL. IASTM and OTES reduced the intensity of headache, alleviated neck pain, and improved QoL, although there were conflicting findings following OTES alone on disability and intensity of headache. Both FPNF and CTM reduced the intensity of headache. Acupressure as an adjunct to medication did not show additional benefits on the intensity of headache and QoL. Quantitative analysis of the data showed that manual physical therapy combined with medication reduced the intensity of headache (p = 0.0796), and manual or AE combined with medication reduced the headache days per month (p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: A limited number of RCTs investigating the efficacy of physical therapy and rehabilitation approaches show promise in improving headache symptoms, reducing disability, and enhancing QoL in CM. Meta-analysis of the data also supported favorable outcomes for both intensity and headache days per month. Further research is needed to better understand the efficacy, optimal duration, and safety of physical therapy and rehabilitation approaches for CM, and to explore alternative interventions.

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI/T) for individuals with temporomandibular disorders.

PURPOSE: To translate the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory into Turkish (CF-PDI/T) and to examine its reliability and validity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cultural adaptation of CF-PDI/T was conducted according to international standards. The psychometric analyses included reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test/retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC); structural validity was evaluated with exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA); and construct validity was investigated by matching (a priori hypotheses) the CF-PDI/T with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders-12 (TSK-TMD-12), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI), and Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20). Correlations ranging from low to high were expected. RESULTS: CF-PDI/T showed excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.971), excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.985), and low to high correlation with NRS, HIT-6, TSK-TMD, PCS, NDI, FAI, and JFLS-20. Following EFA, three factors ("pain and psychosocial limitation", "jaw functional status", and "frequency comorbidities and disability") were extracted, accounting for 55.028% of the total variation. CONCLUSIONS: The CF-PDI/T is a reliable and valid instrument to assess the symptoms and disability in the Turkish population with temporomandibular disorders. Clinical trial registration number: NCT03837587.Implications for rehabilitationThe Spanish version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory is a highly reliable and good valid outcome measure to evaluate disability and treatment outcomes for individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).We suggest the Turkish version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI/T) be used in the Turkish population to indicate small changes in the severity of disorder of individuals with TMDs until a normal quality of life is achieved.The CF-PDI/T can be used with high reliability and validity by experienced and inexperienced dentists and physiotherapists.

Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment For Gluteal Tendinopathy (VISA-G) questionnaire in individuals with greater trochanteric pain syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a common cause of lateral hip pain. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to translate the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for Gluteal Tendinopathy (VISA-G) questionnaire into the Turkish language and to examine its reliability and validity. METHODS: 108 individuals (45 female, 63 male) participated in the translation and the reliability and validity analysis. The original VISA-G questionnaire was translated into Turkish language using Beaton guidelines. The Turkish version of the VISA-G, Harris Hip Score (HHS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) were applied to 108 individuals with GTPS for convergent validity. The VISA-G was retested to investigate its reliability after one week. RESULTS: The VISA-G had a good correlation with HHS (r = 0.694, p < .001), ODI (r = -0.659, p < .001), OHS (r = 0.678, p < .001), and IPAQ (r = 0.440, p < .001). The reliability and internal consistency were excellent (ICC (2,1) value = 0.943; Cronbach's α = 0.946, respectively). And no floor and ceiling effects were revealed related VISA-G. CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the VISA-G has good validity and excellent reliability. It can be used in clinical and research practices in the Turkish population with GTPS.

Development, reliability and validity of the Closed Kinetic Chain Lower Extremity Stability Test (CKCLEST): a new clinical performance test.

This study aimed to develop and determine the test-retest, intra- and interrater reliability, and validity of the Closed Kinetic Chain Lower Extremity Stability Test (CKCLEST). Three-blinded, cross-sectional, repeated-measures clinical measurement reliability trial. Fifty young adults participated in this study. To assess the reliability of CKCLEST, intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, and Bland-Altman plot were used. For concurrent validity of CKCLEST was applied Spearman correlation analysis with Vertical Jump Test, Isokinetic Dynamometer Test, Single-Leg Hop Test, and Prone Bridge Test. All analyses were made for both the best score and the average score. CKCLEST showed excellent reliability. ICC for test-retest reliability (0.93; 0.84), intrarater reliability (rater 1: 0.90; 0.83- rater 2: 0.93; 0.85), and interrater reliability (0.90; 0.83) was calculated for average score and best score, respectively. CKCLEST was found to be moderately correlated with each of the tests. CKCLEST is a highly reliable, valid, and new clinical assessment tool.