Safety and efficacy of low-dose fondaparinux (1.5 mg) for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients with renal impairment: the FONDAIR study.

BACKGROUND: Renal impairment is common, affecting around 40% of acutely ill medical patients, and is associated with an increased risk of both venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding. The clinical benefit of effective thromboprophylactic strategies may be outweighed in these patients by an excessive rate of hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of lower prophylactic doses of fondaparinux in acutely ill medical patients with renal impairment. PATIENTS/METHODS: We carried out a multicenter, investigator-initiated, prospective cohort study. Patients at risk of VTE with a creatinine clearance between 20 and 50 mL min(-1) were treated with fondaparinux 1.5 mg qd for a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 15 days. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding; secondary outcomes were clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and symptomatic VTE. RESULTS: We enrolled 206 patients with a mean age of 82 years, mean creatinine clearance of 33 mL min(-1) , and a mean Charlson co-morbidity index of 8.2. One patient had major bleeding (0.49%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-3.10), eight had CRNMB (3.88%, 95% CI 1.81-7.78) and three developed symptomatic VTE (1.46%, 0.38-4.55). Twenty-three patients (11.17%, 7.36-16.48) died. No independent predictors of bleeding were found at univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of moderate to severe renal impairment to patients with traditional risk factors for VTE identified a population of very elderly acutely ill medical patients potentially at high risk of both VTE and bleeding complications. The recently approved lower prophylactic dose of fondaparinux appears to be a safe and relatively effective strategy in these patients.

Tumour markers in internal medicine: a low-cost test or an unnecessary expense? A retrospective study based on appropriateness.

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND: In the last 35 years tumour markers (TM) have gained currency in clinical practice. However, in the light of indications by international guidelines, their use is often unjustified. Our aim was to quantify the use of some of the most common TM, assessing their appropriateness and their efficacy in an Internal Medicine Unit. METHODS: In the three Internal Medicine Units of the Department of Internal Medicine of Policlinico of Modena we have carried out a retrospective analysis of the assessment of the main TM (CEA, CA19.9, CA 125, CA 15.3, NSE). The analysis was divided into two distinct phases: (I) quantitative phase, in order to assess the scale of the problem in economical terms; (II) qualitative phase, in order to assess the efficacy of the tests and the appropriateness of their use. RESULTS: (I) At last one of the considered TM was requested in 5102 out of the 8253 admitted patients (62%) (period 2001-2003). The trend was similar in all three units examined. (II) The qualitative analyses revealed: (1) the most common motivation for their use (79%) was diagnostic, mostly prior to any other test; (2) a mere 5% of the requests were appropriate according to the international literature; and (3) TM showed a low positive predictive value when used for diagnosis in an unselected population such as that of an Internal Medicine unit. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study showed that TM determination represents an overall cost for Internal Medicine units and that there is a high inappropriateness in their use compared to what it is suggested by international guidelines. Though the TM is a low-cost test when used correctly, it seems an unnecessary expense if not adequately incorporated into the decision making process.

Extensive homology between the major immunodominant mitochondrial antigen in primary biliary cirrhosis and Helicobacter pylori does not lead to immunological cross-reactivity.

BACKGROUND: Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an immune-mediated chronic cholestatic disease characterized by the presence of antibodies directed predominantly against the E2 subunit of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC-E2). What provokes tolerance breakdown in PBC remains to be established, though there is evidence to indicate that microbes may induce anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) through a mechanism of molecular mimicry. METHODS: Having found that urease beta (UREB)(22-36) antigen of Helicobacter pylori (HELPY) shares extensive (87%) similarity with PDC-E2(212-226), the major mitochondrial autoepitope, it was hypothesized that this would also lead to cross-reactivity. The UREB/PDC-E2 mimics were thus constructed and tested by ELISA in 112 PBC patients and 114 controls. RESULTS: Reactivity to PDC-E2(212-226) was found in 104 patients but to UREB(22-36) in only 2. In these two patients, the double reactivity was not cross-reactive. The lack of surface antibody accessibility to UREB(22-36), as demonstrated through three-dimensional model prediction analysis, may explain this unexpected finding. There was some speculation on whether HELPY UREB(22-36) might act as a cross-reactive CD4 T-cell epitope. All seven PBC patients, tested in a standard proliferation assay against PDC-E2(212-226), gave a positive response. All seven were unresponsive to HELPY UREB(22-36). The pattern of reactivity to HELPY antigens by immunoblot was similar between anti-PDC-E2-positive and negative PBC cases, as well as between PBC patients and controls. CONCLUSION: Contrary to common belief, extensive sequence homology (molecular mimicry) between self and microbe does not necessarily result in cross-reactivity. It is therefore likely that, when present, cross-reactivity between self and microbes is of biological importance.