Assessment and comparison of thermochemical pathways for the rice residues valorization: pyrolysis and gasification.

Lignocellulosic biomass conversion applying thermochemical routes has been postulated as an alternative for generating renewable energy. This research compares energy-driven biorefineries based on two thermochemical routes addressed to upgrade rice husk and rice straw produced in the Department of Sucre-Colombia. Initially, this research analyzes the physico-chemical and structural characterization of the rice residues. Four different scenarios were proposed to compare the energy-driven biorefineries based on fast pyrolysis and gasification considering technical, economic, and environmental metrics. These biorefineries were simulated using the Aspen Plus V.14.0 software. The novelty of this research is focused on the identification of the biorefinery with the best techno-economic, energetic, and environmental performance in the Colombian context. Economic and environmental analyses were done by using economic metrics and emissions. From an economic perspective, the stand-alone gasification process did not have a positive economic margin. In contrast, the fast pyrolysis process has the best economic performance since this process has a positive profit margin. Indeed, scenario 1 (fast pyrolysis of both rice residues) presented an economic margin of 13.75% and emissions of 2170.92 kgCO2eq/kg for 10 years. However, this scenario was not energetically the best, holding second place due to the feedstock requirements, compared to gasification. The biorefinery scenario 1 has the best performance.

Study of biorefineries based on experimental data: production of bioethanol, biogas, syngas, and electricity using coffee-cut stems as raw material.

Energy-driven biorefineries can be designed considering biotechnological and thermochemical conversion pathways. Nevertheless, energy and environmental comparisons are necessary to establish the best way to upgrade lignocellulosic biomass and set the requirements of these processes in different scenarios. This paper aims to evaluate experimentally a biorefinery producing energy vectors using coffee-cut stems (CCS) as feedstock. The obtained yields were the basis for energy and environmental analysis, in two different biorefinery scenarios: (i) production of bioethanol and biogas and (ii) production of syngas and electricity. The energy results indicated that the overall energy efficiency calculated in the first scenario was only 9.15%. Meanwhile, the second biorefinery configuration based on thermochemical routes presented an energy efficiency value of 70.89%. This difference was attributed to the higher consumption of utilities in the biorefinery based on biotechnological routes. The environmental results showed that the impact category of climate change for the first biorefinery (i.e., 0.0193 kg CO2 eq./MJ) had a lower value than that of the second process (i.e., 0.2377 kg CO2 eq./MJ). Thus, the biorefinery based on the biotechnological route presented a better environmental performance. Additionally, the results for both biorefineries allowed concluding that the inclusion of by-products and co-products in the calculation of the environmental analysis can dramatically affect the results.

Comparison of furfural and biogas production using pentoses as platform.

Coffee cut-stems (CCS), a biomass with high lignocellulosic content, is a coffee crop waste after bean harvesting. The main application of this material is as fuelwood for farmers, disregarding their carbohydrate content for biotechnological processes. In these terms, this work aims to compare three process scenarios for the experimental valorization of C5 fraction from CCS to produce biogas and furfural with and without the ethanol production from remaining C6 fraction under biorefinery concept. Therefore, an experimental stage was performed to obtain these products, based on a previous diluted acid pretreatment. The hydrolysate fraction was used to produce furfural and biogas, achieving yields of 0.34 g of furfural/g xylose and 81.1 mL of CH4 per gram of volatile solids. Concerning the solid fraction after acid pretreatment, it was used to produce ethanol with a previous enzymatic hydrolysis. After fermentation, 0.47 g of ethanol/g of glucose (92% of the theoretical yield) was obtained. These experimental results were fed to simulation models in order to compare three scenarios in technical, economic and environmental terms. As the main results, from technical point of view, the biogas production presents the lowest energy requirements. From the economic perspective, the furfural production presents a prefeasibility at the base scale of processing (e.g., 12.5 ton h-1). Meanwhile, the biogas scenario needs a processing capacity >22.5 ton h-1 to achieve the economic prefeasibility. In the biorefinery case, the positive economic performance is found at processing scales above 83 ton h-1. This work concludes that the C5 sugars platform is identified as a potential alternative for the generation of furfural and biogas, however, in this case a multiproduct biorefinery system is not always the best option to valorize biomass given the very high scale required and the economic indicators.