The effect of structured medication review followed by face-to-face feedback to prescribers on adverse drug events recognition and prevention in older inpatients - a multicenter interrupted time series study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of interventions to improve medication safety in older inpatients is unclear, given a paucity of properly designed intervention studies applying clinically relevant endpoints such as hospital-acquired preventable Adverse Drug Events (pADEs) and unrecognized Adverse Drug Events (uADEs). Therefore, we conducted a quality improvement study and used hospital-acquired pADEs and uADEs as main outcomes to assess the effect of an intervention aimed to improve medication safety in older inpatients. METHOD: The study followed an interrupted time series design and consisted of three equally spaced sampling points during baseline and during intervention measurements. Each sampling point included between 80 to 90 patients. A total of 500 inpatients ≥65 years and admitted to internal medicine wards of three Dutch hospitals were included. An expert team retrospectively identified and assessed ADEs via a structured patient chart review. The findings from baseline measurement and meetings with the internal medicine and hospital pharmacy staff were used to design the intervention. The intervention consisted of a structured medication review by hospital pharmacists, followed by face-to-face feedback to prescribers, on average 3 days per week. RESULTS: The rate of hospital-acquired pADEs per 100 hospitalizations was reduced by 50.6% (difference 16.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.0 to 24.6, P <  0.001), serious hospital-acquired pADEs by 62.7% (difference 12.8, 95% CI: 6.4 to 19.2, P <  0.001), and uADEs by 51.8% (difference 11.2, 95% CI: 4.4 to 18.0, P <  0.001). Additional analyses confirmed the robustness of the intervention effect, but residual bias cannot be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention significantly decreased the overall and serious hospital-acquired pADE occurrence in older inpatients, and significantly improved overall ADE recognition by prescribers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Register, trial registration number: ISRCTN64974377 , registration date (date assigned): 07/02/2011.

Adverse drug events in older hospitalized patients: results and reliability of a comprehensive and structured identification strategy.

BACKGROUND: Older patients are at high risk for experiencing Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) during hospitalization. To be able to reduce ADEs in these vulnerable patients, hospitals first need to measure the occurrence of ADEs, especially those that are preventable. However, data on preventable ADEs (pADEs) occurring during hospitalization in older patients are scarce, and no 'gold standard' for the identification of ADEs exists. METHODOLOGY: The study was conducted in three hospitals in the Netherlands in 2007. ADEs were retrospectively identified by a team of experts using a comprehensive and structured patient chart review (PCR) combined with a trigger-tool as an aid. This ADE identification strategy was applied to a cohort of 250 older hospitalized patients. To estimate the intra- and inter-rater reliabilities, Cohen's kappa values were calculated. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In total, 118 ADEs were detected which occurred in 62 patients. This ADE yield was 1.1 to 2.7 times higher in comparison to other ADE studies in older hospitalized patients. Of the 118 ADEs, 83 (70.3%) were pADEs; 51 pADEs (43.2% of all ADEs identified) caused serious patient harm. Patient harm caused by ADEs resulted in various events. The overall intra-rater agreement of the developed strategy was substantial (κ = 0.74); the overall inter-rater agreement was only fair (κ = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The ADE identification strategy provided a detailed insight into the scope of ADEs occurring in older hospitalized patients, and showed that the majority of (serious) ADEs can be prevented. Several strategy related aspects, as well as setting/study specific aspects, may have contributed to the results gained. These aspects should be considered whenever ADE measurements need to be conducted. The results regarding pADEs can be used to design tailored interventions to effectively reduce harm caused by medication errors. Improvement of the inter-rater reliability of a PCR remains challenging.

Recognition of adverse drug events in older hospitalized medical patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess medical teams' ability to recognize adverse drug events (ADEs) in older inpatients. METHODS: The study cohort comprised 250 patients aged 65 years or older consecutively admitted to Internal Medicine wards of three hospitals in the Netherlands between April and November 2007. An independent expert team identified ADEs present upon admission or occurring during hospitalization by a structured retrospective patient chart review. For all ADEs identified, the expert team assessed causality, severity, preventability, and recognition by medical teams. RESULTS: The medical teams did not recognize 19.9 % of all ADEs present upon admission {60.4 ADEs [95 % confidence interval (CI) 51.5-70.8] per 100 hospitalizations} and 20.3 % of all ADEs occurring during the hospital stay [47.2 ADEs (95 % CI 39.4-56.5) per 100 hospitalizations]. Unrecognized ADEs were significantly more often ADEs with possible causality (p=0.014, df=1), ADEs caused by medication errors (p<0.001, df=1), and ADEs not manifesting as new symptoms (p<0.001, df=1). The medical teams did not recognize 23.2 % of mild to moderately severe ADEs and 16.5 % of severe, life-threatening, or fatal ADEs. The recognition of ADEs varied with event type. CONCLUSIONS: The recognition of ADEs by medical teams was substantial for those ADEs with evident causality and with clinically apparent and severe consequences. ADEs mimicking underlying pathologies with a lower severity went unrecognized much more often, as did those resulting only in abnormal laboratory values. Tools to improve the recognition of ADEs by medical teams should, therefore, focus on those ADEs that are more challenging to detect.

The effect of an active on-ward participation of hospital pharmacists in Internal Medicine teams on preventable Adverse Drug Events in elderly inpatients: protocol of the WINGS study (Ward-oriented pharmacy in newly admitted geriatric seniors).

BACKGROUND: The potential of clinical interventions, aiming at reduction of preventable Adverse Drug Events (preventable ADEs) during hospital stay, have been studied extensively. Clinical Pharmacy is a well-established and effective service, usually consisting of full-time on-ward participation of clinical pharmacists in medical teams. Within the current Hospital Pharmacy organisation in the Netherlands, such on-ward service is less feasible and therefore not yet established. However, given the substantial incidence of preventable ADEs in Dutch hospitals found in recent studies, appears warranted. Therefore, "Ward-Oriented Pharmacy", an on-ward service tailored to the Dutch hospital setting, will be developed. This service will consist of multifaceted interventions implemented in the Internal Medicine wards by hospital pharmacists. The effect of this service on preventable ADEs in elderly inpatients will be measured. Elderly patients are at high risk for ADEs due to multi-morbidity, concomitant disabilities and polypharmacy. Most studies on the incidence and preventability of ADEs in elderly patients have been conducted in the outpatient setting or on admission to a hospital, and fewer in the inpatient setting. Moreover, recognition of ADEs by the treating physicians is challenging in elderly patients because their disease presentation is often atypical and complex. Detailed information about the performance of the treating physicians in ADE recognition is scarce. METHODS/DESIGN: The design is a multi-centre, interrupted time series study. Patients of 65 years or older, consecutively admitted to Internal Medicine wards will be included. After a pre-measurement, a Ward-Oriented Pharmacy service will be introduced and the effect of this service will be assessed during a post-measurement. The primary outcome measures are the ADE prevalence on admission and ADE incidence during hospital stay. These outcomes will be assessed using structured retrospective chart review by an independent expert panel. This assessment will include determination of causality, severity and preventability of ADEs. In addition, the extent to which ADEs are recognised and managed by the treating physicians will be considered. DISCUSSION: The primary goal of the WINGS study is to assess whether a significant reduction in preventable ADEs in elderly inpatients can be achieved by a Ward-Oriented Pharmacy service offered. A comprehensive ADE detection method will be used based on expert opinion and retrospective, trigger-tool enhanced, chart review.

Dyslipidaemia as predictor of progressive renal failure and the impact of treatment with atorvastatin.

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic renal disease, other lipid markers than total cholesterol or low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol are probably more appropriate to detect a potential lipid-related risk for progression to renal failure. Statin therapy might be protective. METHODS: From 1999 to 2001, 177 consecutive patients with renal disease from our out-patient clinic were included and 169 could be followed-up for a mean period of 4.1 years. Seventy-two progressive patients (end-stage chronic renal disease or >5 ml/min/year decrease of creatinine clearance) were compared in 97 patients with stable or slowly progressive disease (<5 ml/min/year decrease). Throughout the study all patients were treated according to nephrology guidelines. Atorvastatin was instituted in patients with elevated LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) after the baseline determinations RESULTS: Proteinuria, mean arterial pressure and the type of underlying renal disease were independently associated with progressive renal disease. After adjustment for these factors and whether or not statin therapy was started, an increase in plasma apo B concentration was the most predictive lipid parameter for renal failure. An increase in apo B from 0.77 g/l (10th percentile) to 1.77 g/l (90th percentile) was associated with progressive loss of renal function, represented by an odds ratio of 2.63 (95% CI: 1.02-6.76; P = 0.045). Treatment with atorvastatin in the dyslipidaemic patients to lower LDL-C, was also accompanied by a reduction of proteinuria in this group (P < 0.001). The patients who reached the target level for LDL-C of <2.6 mmol/l in response to atorvastatin showed less often progression than patients with higher LDL-C (P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: A high apo B at baseline appeared to be the strongest risk factor among various lipid parameters for progression of renal failure during the following years. Atorvastatin, aimed at lowering LDL-C, reduced proteinuria. Renal outcome was better in patients with the lowest LDL-C on treatment.

The dyslipidemia of chronic renal disease: effects of statin therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Dyslipidemia is a prevalent condition in patients with chronic renal disease, but is often left untreated. Statin treatment constitutes an effective way to improve lipid abnormalities. This review summarizes present studies on dyslipidemia and its treatment in patients with chronic renal disease. RECENT FINDINGS: The specific dyslipidemia in renal disease is associated with the presence of proteinuria and decreased creatinine clearance, and may even adversely affect the progression of chronic renal disease. Statin therapy may have renoprotective effects due to a combination of lipid lowering and pleiotropic effects. Statins exert several anti-inflammatory properties and lead to a decrease of proteinuria. Post-hoc analyses of large-scale lipid lowering trials have shown that the reduction of cardiovascular risk was equivalent to the reduction achieved in patients without chronic renal failure. We feel, however, that if intervention with statins is postponed until patients reach end-stage renal disease, statins have limited benefit. SUMMARY: Present studies suggest that patients with renal disease should be screened early for dyslipidemia and that statins have to be considered as the lipid lowering therapy of choice. These drugs reduce cardiovascular risk. Further studies are needed to firmly establish whether statins preserve renal function.

Acute effects of high-dose furosemide on residual renal function in CAPD patients.

BACKGROUND: High doses of furosemide can increase urine volume in chronic peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. However, no information is available about effects on urinary solute excretion in relation to residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urinary furosemide excretion, and peritoneal solute kinetics. METHODS: Diuretic response and the effect on peritoneal fluid and solute transport parameters were investigated in 7 stable CAPD patients with residual renal function (median urine volume 350 mL/24 hours, range 140- 1900 mL/24 hours). Comparisons were made during two clearance periods of 24 hours: one without (P1) and one during 2 g furosemide (P2). RESULTS: The median increase in urine volume was 400 mL (range 270 - 910 mL, p < 0.02) and the increase in sodium excretion was 54 mmol (range 25 - 118 mmol, p < 0.02). No change in GFR was found between P1 (2.4 mL/ minute, range 0.6 - 5.7 mL/min) and P2 (2.0 mL/min, range 1.0 - 4.8 mL/min). An increase in fractional clearance was found for volume, sodium, potassium, and osmolality (p < 0.02). No change was found in the fractional clearance of urea and electrolyte-free water. Furosemide excretion in urine was 8.7 mg/24 hours (range 2.1 - 38 mg/24 hours) and in dialysate 4.9 mg/24 hours (range 1.9 - 7.8 mg/ 24 hours). Plasma furosemide concentration was 29.5 mg/L (range 6.2 - 43.9 mg/L). A positive correlation was found between residual GFR and total urine furosemide excretion (r = 0.93, p < 0.005). Efficiency, expressed as the increase in fractional sodium clearance (percent) per milligram of furosemide excreted per 24 hours, was 1.2%/mg (range 0.3% - 11.3%/mg). CONCLUSION: High-dose furosemide is effective in CAPD patients in increasing urine volume and electrolyte excretion without affecting urea and creatinine clearance. In CAPD patients, the individual response to an identical high dose of furosemide is dependent on the magnitude of residual GFR.

Cimetidine improves prediction of the glomerular filtration rate by the Cockcroft-Gault formula in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) can be predicted from plasma creatinine, age, gender, and body weight, using the formula of Cockcroft and Gault. Cimetidine improved the accuracy of GFR prediction in renal disease and also in diabetes mellitus type 2, due to inhibition of tubular creatinine secretion. We compared the accuracy and precision of GFR prediction from the Cockcroft-Gault formula without cimetidine (CG), with cimetidine (CGcim) and from the creatinine clearance without cimetidine in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: CG and CGcim were calculated from plasma creatinine before and after 2400 mg of oral cimetidine during the 24 hr preceding the GFR measurement. The endogenous creatinine clearance was measured in 24 outpatients from a 24-hr urine collection (Ccr24) before cimetidine. GFR was measured as the urinary clearance of continuously infused 125I-iothalamate. Creatinine was determined with an automated enzymatic assay in plasma and with an alkaline picrate assay in urine. RESULTS: GFR was 47.8+/-16.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 (mean+/-SD), Ccr24 was 71.8+/-23.1 ml/min/1.73 m2, CG was 62.2+/-15.2 ml/min/1.73 m2, and CGcim was 52.8+/-14.9 ml/min/1.73 m2. Ccr24 overestimated GFR in every patient by an average of 23.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 and CG by an average of 14.3 ml/min/1.73 m2, whereas CGcim overestimated GFR significantly less by an average 4.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 (P<0.001). The precision of CGcim was significantly better than that of Ccr24: the SD of the difference from GFR was 9.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 for CGcim and 14.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 for Ccr24 (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: CGcim is useful for GFR prediction in outpatient renal transplant recipients and has a far better accuracy and precision than Ccr24 and also a better accuracy than CG. We propose a strategy after kidney transplantation of one GFR measurement at baseline and follow-up with CGcim.