Clinical characteristics and COVID-19-related outcomes of immunocompromised patients receiving tixagevimab/cilgavimab pre-exposure prophylaxis in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Tixagevimab/cilgavimab is a cocktail of two long-acting monoclonal antibodies approved for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (cause of coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) in immunocompromised (IC) or high-risk patients. We investigated the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of IC patients administered tixagevimab/cilgavimab for PrEP in real-world use in Japan. METHODS: This observational study used anonymous secondary data from Real-World Data Co., Ltd. for IC patients aged ≥12 years administered tixagevimab/cilgavimab between September 2022 and September 2023. We analyzed the baseline characteristics and event-rates of COVID-19-related clinical outcomes within 6 months of administration. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 397 IC patients. About half (53.4%) were male and the median age was 71.0 (interquartile range 61.0, 77.0) years. Malignancy (97.2%), cardiovascular disease (71.3%), and diabetes (66.5%) were frequent comorbidities. Systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants were prescribed to 87.4% and 24.9%, respectively. The two most common target clinical conditions were active therapy for hematologic malignancies (88.2%) and treatment with B cell-depleting therapies (57.4%). The event-rates per 100 person-months (95% confidence interval; number) for medically attended COVID-19, COVID-19 hospitalization, in-hospital mortality due to COVID-19, and all-cause death were 4.14 (3.06-5.48; n=49), 1.74 (1.09-2.64; n=22), 0.07 (0.00-0.42; n=1), and 0.60 (0.26-1.17; n=8), respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first report using a multicenter database to describe the clinical characteristics and COVID-19-related outcomes of IC patients administered with tixagevimab/cilgavimab in real-world settings in Japan. This cohort of IC patients who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab included many elderly patients with comorbidities.

Changes in disease burden and treatment reality in patients with severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Biologics are clinically available for patients with severe asthma, but changes in asthma control over time are unknown. We examined changes in disease burden and treatment in severe asthma patients. METHODS: This retrospective study used a Japanese health insurance database (Cross Fact) and included patients aged ≥16 years treated continuously with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for a diagnosis of asthma in each calendar year from 2015 to 2019. Severe asthma was defined as annual use of high-dose ICS plus one or more asthma controller medications four or more times, oral corticosteroids for ≥183 days, or biologics for ≥16 weeks. Changes in asthma exacerbations, prescriptions, and laboratory testing were examined. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar throughout the study. The number and proportion of patients with severe asthma among those with asthma increased (2724; 15.3% in 2015 vs 4485; 19.0% in 2019). The proportion of severe asthma patients with two or more asthma exacerbations decreased from 24.4% to 21.5%. Odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of ≥2 asthma exacerbations in each year compared with 2015 were 0.96 (0.85-1.08) in 2016 and 0.86 (0.76-0.97) in 2017, with significant reductions observed in subsequent years. Short-acting beta agonists and oral corticosteroid prescriptions for asthma exacerbations decreased and long-acting muscarinic antagonist and biologic prescriptions for maintenance treatment increased. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed improvements in disease burden and treatment in severe asthma patients. There remains an unmet medical need for patients with severe asthma, given the proportion who continue to have asthma exacerbations.

A Retrospective Claims Database Study to Clarify Treatment Reality of Asthma Patients Before and After Referral to a Specialist.

Purpose: Japanese guidelines recommend that patients with uncontrolled asthma be referred by non-specialists to specialists (allergists and/or pulmonologists). This study investigated the reality of clinical practice in asthma patients referred to specialists in Japan. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of asthma patients in a health insurance claim database (Cross Fact) referred from facilities with non-specialists to those with specialists from January 2016 to December 2018. The referred asthma patients were defined as patients with ≥4 inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing prescriptions during a 1-year baseline period, with an asthma diagnosis, and who had visited a facility with specialists. Asthma exacerbation, maintenance treatment, laboratory tests, and medical procedures before and after referral were analyzed. Results: Data for 2135 patients were extracted, of which 420 with referral codes were analyzed. The proportion of patients with asthma exacerbations was 50.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.4-55.1%) before referral and 37.4% (95% CI: 32.7-42.2%) after, a significant decrease (P<0.001; McNemar test). The proportions of patients prescribed ICS alone, long-acting beta-agonists (LABA), and ICS/LABA were lower after referral than before, but the proportions of patients prescribed long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), ICS/LABA/LAMA, and biologics increased after referral. More asthma-related laboratory tests were performed after referral, and spirometry incidence increased from 16.4% before referral to 51.4% after referral. Conclusion: This study shows a decrease in asthma exacerbations, change in asthma treatments, and increase in laboratory tests after referral to a specialist, suggesting that referrals to specialists lead to better management of asthma.

Oral Corticosteroid Reduction Between Biologics Initiated and Non-Initiated Patients with Severe Asthma.

Purpose: The oral corticosteroid (OCS)-sparing effect of several biologics (BIOs) has been shown in clinical trials. To date, no study has evaluated differences in OCS dose reduction between BIO-initiated and BIO-non-initiated patients in real-world clinical practice. We compared dose reductions in maintenance OCS between BIO-initiated and BIO-non-initiated severe asthma patients in a real-world setting. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the data from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database of Medical Data Vision in Japan. Severe asthma patients with continuous use of OCS were selected from December 2015 to February 2020. The primary endpoint was the proportion reduction in daily maintenance OCS dose from Week 0 to Week 24. Analyses were performed using inverse probability treatment weighting. Results: In total, 2927 patients were included (BIO-initiated: 239 patients, BIO-non-initiated: 2688 patients). Adjusted median (quartile [Q] 1-Q3) proportion reduction in daily maintenance OCS dose at Week 24 from the index date was 25.0% (0.0-100.0%) and 0.0% (0.0-83.3%) in the BIO-initiated and BIO-non-initiated groups, respectively (Hodges-Lehmann estimate [95% confidence interval], 0.0000% [0.0000-0.3365%]). Respective proportions of patients in the BIO-initiated and BIO-non-initiated groups achieving dose reductions from the index date in the daily maintenance OCS dose at Week 24 were >0% reduction, 56.6% and 44.1% (odds ratio [OR] 1.6554); ≥25% reduction, 50.5% and 40.6% (OR 1.4888); ≥50% reduction, 42.8% and 33.7% (OR 1.4714); and 100% reduction, 26.2% and 24.4% (OR 1.1005). Conclusion: Among severe asthma patients, the daily dose of maintenance OCS was reduced with BIO treatment. Although a higher percentage of patients in the BIO-initiated group had an OCS reduction of ≤75% than the BIO-non-initiated group, we found no clear difference in OCS reduction. Our findings will be justified by further research that incorporates a longer observation period and variables excluded from this study. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05136547).

Real-World Evidence on the Diagnostic and Clinical Characteristics of Asthma in Japanese Patients with COPD: The ACO Japan Cohort Study.

Introduction: The ACO Japan Cohort Study, a multicenter observational study, investigated the proportion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who met the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) diagnostic criteria, characteristics of ACO and non-ACO patients, and the patient transitions between ACO/non-ACO diagnosis over 2 years. Patients and Methods: Patients with COPD were consecutively enrolled between June and December 2018 and followed up continuously for 2 years. All participating study sites were medical institutions where respiratory specialists routinely conducted medical examinations/tests required for ACO diagnosis. Results: Among 708 patients with COPD, 101 (14.3%), 118 (16.7%), and 125 (17.7%) were diagnosed with ACO at registration, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. In total, 22.6% of patients lacked the data necessary for ACO diagnosis throughout the 2 years. Among patients who had the necessary data for ACO diagnosis, 24.7% were diagnosed with ACO at 2 years. More ACO patients had moderate or severe exacerbations in the past year than non-ACO patients at registration (15.8% vs 6.3%, p = 0.049) and 1 year (19.4% vs 7.6%, p = 0.025). ACO patients had a greater decrease in mean forced expiratory volume in one second over 2 years than non-ACO patients (-92.0 vs 43.4 mL). Among patients diagnosed with ACO at registration, 21.4% transitioned to non-ACO after 1 year. Conversely, almost all non-ACO patients at registration remained non-ACO after 1 year. Conclusion: COPD patients with ACO determined by the JRS criteria had a high risk of exacerbations and a rapid decline in respiratory function, indicating that the JRS criteria for ACO are useful for identifying high-risk COPD patients. Testing necessary for ACO diagnosis is insufficiently performed even in real-world clinical practice of COPD specialists.

Effect of timing of bronchodilator therapy initiation on exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of prompt vs delayed treatment initiation with inhaled long-acting bronchodilators in reducing exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unclear. This study aimed to investigate if long-acting bronchodilator therapy initiation within 30 days of COPD diagnosis reduces exacerbation risk in patients with COPD. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with COPD based on claims and electronic medical records data extracted from the Real World Data database. The index date (day 0) was the date of the first confirmed inpatient or outpatient COPD diagnosis between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018. Patients with COPD without an asthma diagnosis and aged ≥ 40 years at the index date were included. Patients who initiated inhaled long-acting bronchodilator therapy within the first 30 days (day 0 to day 29) were categorized into the "prompt therapy" group and the rest into the "delayed therapy" group. Time from day 30 post-diagnosis to the first exacerbation and annual exacerbation rate (AER) were evaluated for the overall population and those stratified by COPD phenotype, including chronic bronchitis (CB) and emphysema. RESULTS: Compared with the delayed therapy group (n = 1516), time to first exacerbation was prolonged (hazard ratio 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.70, 0.87]) and annual rates of moderate or severe exacerbations were lower (rate ratio 0.74; 95% CI [0.65, 0.84]) in the prompt therapy group (n = 1466). Similarly, time to first exacerbation was prolonged and AERs were lower in the prompt therapy group in the subgroups of patients with CB or emphysema. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate a prolonged time to first exacerbation upon initiation of long-acting bronchodilators within 30 days of COPD diagnosis. A beneficial effect was also observed in patients with CB and emphysema. Our data support advising patients to initiate long-acting bronchodilators soon after COPD diagnosis.

Real-World Status of Medical Care and Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Respiratory Specialists in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: The ACO Registry Study was a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study aiming to clarify the situation of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) within the COPD population using the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) criteria. We reported the proportion of patients who met the ACO criteria among the COPD population at study registration. METHODS: Using data collected at registration, we investigated the implementation of each diagnostic examination/test required for ACO diagnosis in the full analysis set. Among patients with data necessary for ACO diagnosis, ACO/non-ACO patients with/without asthma diagnosed by a physician and proportions of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatments for COPD were calculated. RESULTS: Of 708 patients analyzed, 396 (55.9%) had the data necessary for ACO diagnosis, and 312 (44.1%) did not. The proportions of patients who underwent laboratory and respiratory function tests (peripheral blood eosinophil count [79.8%], fractional exhaled nitric oxide [63.7%], airway reversibility [46.8%], and total immunoglobulin [Ig] E/specific IgE [33.3%]) were lower than those who underwent subjective examinations (perennial allergic rhinitis [100%], asthma before age 40 years [97.2%], and variable/paroxysmal respiratory symptoms [94.5%]). Among patients with the data necessary for ACO diagnosis and without asthma complications according to the physician's diagnosis, 15.1% (33/219) met the ACO criteria. Of patients who met the ACO criteria, 74.3% (75/101) received ICS, and 25.7% (26/101) did not. By comparison, among patients who did not meet the ACO criteria, 35.6% (105/295) were receiving ICS, and 64.4% (190/295) were not. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of objective laboratory and physiological tests was lower than expected, despite study sites having the clinical resources for objective tests. Most ACO patients were being treated with ICS as recommended in the JRS treatment guidelines. Attempts should be made to further increase the proper use of ICS among these patients in Japan. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03577795.

Regional differences in the incidence of asthma exacerbations in Japan: A heat map analysis of healthcare insurance claims data.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, regional differences in asthma mortality have been reported; however, regional differences in asthma exacerbations have not been studied extensively. Therefore, using a health insurance claims database, we investigated the regional differences in the incidence of asthma exacerbations in Japan. METHODS: This study used data from Medi-Scope (Japan Medical Information Research Institute Inc., Japan)-a nationwide health insurance claims database. Patients with asthma at the index date (the latest date of an asthma-related prescription with an asthma diagnosis before October 1, 2018) were included in the analysis. The pre-index period was defined as 1 year before the index date, and the follow-up period as 1 year after the index date. The incidence of asthma exacerbation events was analyzed for each region. RESULTS: The primary analysis population comprised 24,883 patients who were continuously prescribed ICS or ICS/LABA at least four times during the pre-index period. The incidence rate of asthma exacerbations with hospitalization was the highest in Chugoku (2.95/100 person-years [95% CI, 1.97-4.43]) and the lowest in Kanto (1.52/100 person-years [95% CI, 1.26-1.83]). The incidence rate of asthma exacerbations for the composite outcome of hospitalization, injectable corticosteroid prescription, and oral corticosteroid burst was the highest in Fukui (105.00/100 person-years [95% CI, 64.53-170.85]) and the lowest in Nagasaki (15.69/100 person-years [95% CI, 10.84-22.72]). CONCLUSIONS: Regional differences in the incidence of asthma exacerbations as well as their treatments were observed in Japan.