ABSTRACT
Introducción: Diversas entidades clínicas, como enfermedades autoinmunes, infecciones, neoplasias y fármacos pueden manifestarse con lesiones vasculíticas en la piel. Debido a la heterogeneidad de las causas, suelen representar un desafío diagnóstico. El objetivo de este estudio es describir la etiología de las vasculitis cutáneas (VC) y evaluar las características clínicas, histológicas y de laboratorio halladas en estos pacientes. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo con revisión de historias clínicas de pacientes mayores de 16 años con VC por diagnóstico clínico y/o histológico evaluados en el período 2010-2018. Resultados: Se incluyeron 74 pacientes. El 69% son mujeres con una edad media al diagnóstico de 41 años (DE 16.5, rango 16-75). Las causas más frecuentes asociadas a las VC fueron las enfermedades autoinmunes (EAI) en un 50% de los pacientes evaluados. En el 29.7% de los casos no pudo identificarse una causa subyacente. En el 2.7% de los casos se asoció a neoplasias, otro 2.7% a fármacos y un 12% a otras etiologías. El 76% de los pacientes presentaron formas clínicas no severas, predominando la púrpura palpable en el 65% de los casos. Entre los pacientes biopsiados, el 76% fueron vasculitis leucocitoclásticas (VLC). Como manifestaciones extracutáneas asociadas, predominó el compromiso articular (43,2%). En las vasculitis asociadas a EAI, el 33 % presentó compromiso renal, en tanto que éste no se observó en ninguno de los pacientes con vasculitis idiopáticas. El 78% de los pacientes recibieron glucocorticoides sistémicos. Conclusión: En nuestro centro, la etiología más común de VC fue la asociada a EAI. La mayoría de los pacientes eran mujeres. Clínicamente predominaron las manifestaciones cutáneas no severas y la VLC fue el hallazgo más frecuente en las biopsias.
Background: Various clinical entities, such as autoimmune diseases, infections, neoplasms and drugs can manifest with vasculitic lesions on the skin. Due to the heterogeneity of causes, they often represent a diagnostic challenge. The aim of this study is to describe the etiology of cutaneous vasculitis (CV) and to assess the clinical, histological and laboratory characteristics found in these patients. Material and methods: A retrospective study was carried out with a review of the medical records of patients over 16 years old with CV by clinical and/or histological diagnosis evaluated in the period 2010-2018. Results: 74 patients were included. 69% are women with a mean age at diagnosis of 41 years (SD 16.5, range 16-75). The most frequent causes associated with CVs were autoimmune diseases (AID) in 50% of the patients evaluated. In 29.7% of the cases, an underlying cause could not be identified. In 2.7% of the cases it was associated with neoplasms, another 2.7% with drugs, and 12% with other etiologies. 76% of the patients presented non-severe clinical forms, with palpable purpura predominant in 65% of the cases. Among the biopsied patients, 76% were leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV). As associated extracutaneous manifestations, joint involvement predominated (43.2%). In vasculitis associated with AID, 33% presented renal involvement, while this was not observed in any of the patients with idiopathic vasculitis. 78% of the patients received systemic glucocorticoids. Conclusion: In our center, the most common etiology of CV was associated with AID. Most of the patients were women. Clinically, non-severe skin manifestations predominated and VLC was the most frequent finding in biopsies.
Subject(s)
Vasculitis , Skin Manifestations , Clinical DiagnosisABSTRACT
Introduction: After more than 20 years of sustained work, the Latin American Group for the Study of Lupus (GLADEL) has made a significant number of contributions to the field of lupus, not only in the differential role that race/ethnicity plays in its course and outcome but also in several other studies including the beneficial effects of using antimalarials in lupus patients and the development of consensus guidelines for the treatment of lupus in our region. Methods: A new generation of "Lupus Investigators" in more than 40 centers throughout Latin America has been constituted in order to continue the legacy of the investigators of the original cohort and to launch a novel study of serum and urinary biomarkers in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Results: So far, we have recruited 807 patients and 631 controls from 42 Latin-American centers including 339 patients with SLE without renal involvement, 202 patients with SLE with prevalent but inactive renal disease, 176 patients with prevalent and active renal disease and 90 patients with incident lupus nephritis. Conclusions: The different methodological aspects of the GLADEL 2.0 cohort are discussed in this manuscript, including the challenges and difficulties of conducting such an ambitious project.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Assessment of risk both for pregnancy morbidity and thrombosis in the presence of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) is still a challenge in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients. The Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) takes into account the aPL profile (criteria and non-criteria aPL), the conventional cardiovascular risk factors and the autoimmune antibody profile. An adjusted model of the score (aGAPSS) excluding anti-phosphatidylserine/Prothrombin (aPS/PT), suggests that the score is able to stratify patients for their rate of events making it widely applicable in daily clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To validate the aGAPSS in a multicentric cohort of SLE patients in Argentina. PATIENTS AND METHODS: consecutive SLE patients with and with andwithout thrombotic events from seven Rheumatologist centers were included. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors, aPL antibodies and medications received (aspirin, hydroxychloroquine and anticoagulation) were collected. The score aGAPSS was calculated for each patient at the last visit by adding together the points corresponding to the risk factors: 1 for hypertension, 3 for dyslipidemia, 4 for LA and B2GPI (IgM or IgG) antibodies and 5 for aCL (IgM or IgG) antibodies. The discriminative ability of the aGAPSS was calculated by measuring the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the impact of multiple cardiovascular risk factors and laboratory parameters on the occurrence of thrombosis. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-six SLE patients were included. One-hundred and twenty-one patients (40.9%) presented thrombotic and/or pregnancy complications. Median aGAPSS was significantly higher in patients who experienced an event (thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity) compared with those without [4 (IQR 1-9) versus 1 (IQR 0-5); p < 0.001]. The best cut off point for the diagnosis of thrombosis and/or pregnancy complications was aGAPSS ≥4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that aCL antibodies [OR 2.1 (95% CI 1.16-3.90); p = 0.015] were an independent risk factors for thrombotic events. CONCLUSIONS: This score is a simple tool, easy to apply to SLE patients in daily practice. The use of the aGAPSS could change the non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment in higher risk patients to improve their survival.
