Ondansetron is no more effective than supplemental intraoperative oxygen for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

UNLABELLED: Supplemental oxygen maintained during and for 2 h after colon resection halves the incidence of nausea and vomiting. Whether supplemental oxygen restricted to the intraoperative period is sufficient remains unknown. Similarly, the relative efficacy of supplemental oxygen and ondansetron is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that intraoperative supplemental oxygen reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Patients (n = 240) undergoing gynecological laparoscopy were given a standardized isoflurane anesthetic. After induction, they were randomly assigned to the following three groups: routine oxygen administration with 30% oxygen, balance nitrogen (30% Oxygen group), supplemental oxygen administration with 80% oxygen, balance nitrogen (80% Oxygen group), and Ondansetron 8 mg (immediately after induction), combined with 30% oxygen, balance nitrogen (Ondansetron group). The overall incidence of nausea and/or vomiting during the initial 24 postoperative h was 44% in the patients assigned to 30% oxygen and 30% in the Ondansetron group, but only 22% in those given 80% oxygen. The incidence was thus halved by supplemental oxygen and was significantly less than with 30% oxygen. There were, however, no significant differences between the 30% oxygen and ondansetron groups, or between the ondansetron and 80% oxygen groups. We conclude that supplemental oxygen effectively prevents postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecological laparoscopic surgery; furthermore, ondansetron is no more effective than supplemental oxygen. IMPLICATIONS: Supplemental oxygen reduces the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) as well or better than 8 mg of ondansetron. Because oxygen is inexpensive and essentially risk-free, supplemental oxygen is a preferable method of reducing PONV.

Negative pressure rewarming vs. forced air warming in hypothermic postanesthetic volunteers.

We compared changes in core temperature and systemic heat balance with a new negative pressure/warming device (Vital Heat(R) ) that uses negative pressure combined with heat to facilitate warming in vasoconstricted postoperative patients to those resulting from passive insulation or forced air. Seven healthy volunteers were anesthetized and cooled to a tympanic membrane temperature near 34 degrees C. Anesthesia was discontinued and shivering was prevented by using meperidine. The vasoconstricted volunteers were rewarmed for 2 h using three randomly assigned methods: 1) Vital Heat plus cotton blanket; 2) one layer of cotton blanket; 3) forced-air warming. Thermal flux was recorded from 15 skin-surface sites; metabolic heat production was estimated from total body oxygen consumption. Metabolic heat production remained constant throughout the study. Systemic heat loss remained constant during warming with cotton blankets but decreased significantly during the other treatments. Systemic heat balance increased significantly more with forced air (140 +/- 21 kcal) than with Vital Heat (66 +/- 19 kcal) or cotton blankets (47 +/- 18 kcal). Core temperature increased no faster with Vital Heat warming (1.3 +/- 0.4 degrees C) than with a cotton blanket (1.2 +/- 0.4 degrees C). In contrast, core temperature increased more rapidly with forced air warming (2.6 +/- 0.6 degrees C). In this study we show that calories from a negative pressure rewarming device are largely constrained to the forearm and that heat does not flow to the core thermal compartment.

Aggressive warming reduces blood loss during hip arthroplasty.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the effects of aggressive warming and maintenance of normothermia on surgical blood loss and allogeneic transfusion requirement. We randomly assigned 150 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with spinal anesthesia to aggressive warming (to maintain a tympanic membrane temperature of 36.5 degrees C) or conventional warming (36 degrees C). Autologous and allogeneic blood were given to maintain a priori designated hematocrits. Blood loss was determined by a blinded investigator based on sponge weight and scavenged cells; postoperative loss was determined from drain output. Results were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Average intraoperative core temperatures were warmer in the patients assigned to aggressive warming (36.5 degrees +/- 0.3 degrees vs 36.1 degrees +/- 0.3 degrees C, P< 0.001). Mean arterial pressure was similar in each group preoperatively, but was greater intraoperatively in the conventionally warmed patients: 86+/-12 vs 80+/-9 mm Hg, P<0.001. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly greater in the conventional warming (618 mL; interquartile range, 480-864 mL) than the aggressive warming group (488 mL; interquartile range, 368-721 mL; P: = 0.002), whereas postoperative blood loss did not differ in the two groups. Total blood loss during surgery and over the first two postoperative days was also significantly greater in the conventional warming group (1678 mL; interquartile range, 1366-1965 mL) than in the aggressively warmed group (1,531 mL; interquartile range, 1055-1746 mL, P = 0.031). A total of 40 conventionally warmed patients required 86 units of allogeneic red blood cells, whereas 29 aggressively warmed patients required 62 units (P = 0.051 and 0.061, respectively). We conclude that aggressive intraoperative warming reduces blood loss during hip arthroplasty. IMPLICATIONS: Aggressive warming better maintained core temperature (36.5 degrees vs 36.1 degrees C) and slightly decreased intraoperative blood pressure. Aggressive warming also decreased blood loss by approximately 200 mL. Aggressive warming may thus, be beneficial in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.

Temperature monitoring and management during neuraxial anesthesia: an observational study.

UNLABELLED: Temperature monitoring and thermal management are rare during spinal or epidural anesthesia because clinicians apparently restrict monitoring to patients with an expected risk of hypothermia. This implies that anesthesiologists can predict patient thermal status without monitoring core temperature. We therefore, tested the hypotheses that during neuraxial anesthesia: 1) amount of core hypothermia depends on the magnitude and duration of surgery; 2) temperature monitoring and thermal management are used selectively in patients at high risk of hypothermia; and 3) anesthesiologists can estimate patient thermal status. We evaluated thermal status on arrival in the recovery room along with intraoperative thermal management and monitoring in 120 patients. Anesthesiologists were asked if their patients were hypothermic (<36 degrees C). There was no correlation between the magnitude or duration of surgery and initial postoperative core temperature in unwarmed patients. Temperature monitoring and thermal management were not used selectively in high-risk patients. Initial postoperative tympanic membrane temperatures were <36 degrees C in 77% of patients and <35 degrees C in 22%. Body temperature was monitored intraoperatively in 27% of the patients and forced-air warming was used in 31%. Anesthesiologists failed to accurately estimate whether their patients were hypothermic. Our results suggest that temperature monitoring and management during neuraxial anesthesia is currently inadequate. IMPLICATIONS: In this observational study, we evaluated core temperatures and intraoperative thermal management in patients undergoing spinal or epidural anesthesia. Hypothermia was common, however, rarely detected either by temperature monitoring or estimates by anesthesiologists. In addition, it was not treated with active warming. Consequently, temperature monitoring and management have to be done during neuraxial anesthesia.

The influence of 2 surgical bandage systems on wound tissue oxygen tension.

HYPOTHESIS: Local wound heating improves tissue oxygen tension in postoperative patients. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Forty normothermic and well-hydrated patients recovering from elective open abdominal surgery. INTERVENTIONS: A comparison between an experimental bandage system (Warm-Up; Augustine Medical Inc, Eden Prairie, Minn) and conventional gauze covered with elastic adhesive (Medipore Dress-it; 3M, St Paul, Minn). The experimental system is heated to 38 degrees C and does not touch the wound. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subcutaneous tissue oxygen tension was measured postoperatively and on the first postoperative day. In a subgroup, we also evaluated the effects of bandage pressure per se on tissue oxygen. RESULTS: Initial postoperative tissue oxygen tensions were approximately 30 mm Hg greater with the experimental bandage, even before warming. Subcutaneous oxygen tension during heating remained significantly greater in patients with the warmed bandage than the conventional elastic bandage (116 +/- 40 vs 85 +/- 34 mm Hg, respectively) while the patients were breathing approximately 50% oxygen. The difference was smaller on the first postoperative day, but still statistically significant (82 +/- 30 vs 65 +/- 22 mm Hg, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, tissue oxygen tension increased significantly by 12 +/- 4 mm Hg when the heating bandage was substituted for a conventional bandage (P<.001). CONCLUSION: In normothermic and well-hydrated surgical patients, much benefit from the heating bandage system appears to result from pressure relief. These data suggest that relieving wound pressure markedly improves tissue perfusion and oxygenation.

Postoperative pain and subcutaneous oxygen tension.

Surgical patients randomly assigned to standard pain control had postoperative subcutaneous oxygen partial pressures that were significantly less than patients given better pain treatment. Our data suggest that control of postoperative pain is a major determinant of surgical-wound infection and should be given the same consideration as maintaining adequate vascular volume and normothermia.

Onset time, recovery duration, and drug cost with four different methods of inducing general anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: We compared two conventional induction techniques (thiopental and propofol), an inhaled induction with sevoflurane using a circle system, and a rebreathing method. Fentanyl 1 microg/kg was given to women undergoing 10- to 20-min procedures. Anesthesia was induced (n = 20 each) with one of the following: 1) sevoflurane and N2O from a rebreathing bag (Sevo/Bag). A 5-L bag was prefilled with a mixture of sevoflurane 7% and N2O 60% in oxygen. The bag was connected between the normal circle system, separated by a spring-loaded valve; 2) sevoflurane 8% and N2O 60% from a circle system on a conventional anesthesia machine with a total fresh gas flow of 6 L/min (Sevo/Circle); 3) propofol 3 mg/kg as an i.v. bolus; 4) thiopental sodium 5 mg/kg as an i.v. bolus. Postoperative nausea and vomiting was treated with ondansetron. Induction times were comparable with each method. Recovery duration was shortest with sevoflurane, intermediate with propofol, and longest with thiopental. Induction drug costs were lowest with Sevo/Bag and thiopental, intermediate with Sevo/Circle, and highest with propofol. However, sevoflurane (by either method) caused considerable nausea and vomiting that required treatment. Consequently, total drug cost was least with thiopental, intermediate with Sevo/Bag and propofol, and greatest with Sevo/Circle. Thus, no single technique was clearly superior. IMPLICATIONS: Anesthetic induction techniques influence awakening time, recovery duration, and drug costs. We tested two i.v. methods and two inhaled techniques. However, none of the four tested methods was clearly superior to the others.