IL-6 is associated to IGF-1Ec upregulation and Ec peptide secretion, from prostate tumors.

BACKGROUND: Ec peptide (PEc), resulting from the proteolytic cleavage of the IGF-1Ec isoform, is involved in prostate cancer progression and metastasis, whereas in muscle tissue, it is associated with the mobilization of satellite cells prior to repair. Our aim is to determine the physiological conditions associated to the IGF-1Ec upregulation and PEc secretion in prostate tumors, as well as, the effect of tumor PEc on tumor repair. METHODS: IGF-1 (mature and isoforms) expression was examined by qRT-PCR, both in prostate cancer cells co-incubated with cells of the immune response (IR) and in tumors. PEc secretion was determined by Multiple Reaction Monitoring. The effect of PEc, on mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) mobilization and repair, was examined using migration and invasion assays, FISH and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The JAK/STAT signaling pathway leading to the IGF1-Ec expression was examined by western blot analysis. Determination of the expression and localization of IL-6 and IGF-1Ec in prostate tumors was examined by qRT-PCR and by IHC. RESULTS: We documented that IL-6 secreted by IR cells activates the JAK2 and STAT3 pathway through IL-6 receptor in cancer cells, leading to the IGF-1Ec upregulation and PEc secretion, as well as to the IL-6 expression and secretion. The resulting PEc, apart from its oncogenic role, also mobilizes MSCs towards the tumor, thus promoting tumor repair. CONCLUSIONS: IL-6 leads to the PEc secretion from prostate cancer cells. Apart from its oncogenic role, PEc is also involved in the mobilization of MSCs resulting in tumor repair.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor expression as a prognostic biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer.

Hematologic paraneoplastic alternations may not be very common, but they have been observed in a small number of patients. Granulocytosis has been described in several malignancies and its common mechanism may be associated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) production by the tumor. High neutrophilia (150,000-240,000 white blood cell count) observed in two patients with non-small cell lung cancer led us to run the present trial. The purpose of this study was to compare the white blood cell counts and the G-CSF plasma levels of the patients and classify the results into groups, as well as to determine the survival rates of the patients in each of the groups. The histological specimens and plasma of two patients as well as the plasma of another 87 patients with several malignancies, were examined. The plasma G-CSF levels were determined using a quantitative sandwich immunoassay technique (Quantikine; RySD systems) according to the manufacturer's instructions and all samples were tested in triplicate. It was found that 12 patients had a white blood cell count increased beyond normal as well as a high G-CSF plasma level and the survival of these patients was shorter as compared to the rest of the patients. We assume that these findings may indicate that increased G-CSF levels may function as a biomarker of survival.

Treatment of colorectal cancer with and without bevacizumab: a phase III study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this phase III trial was to compare chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: From September 2004 till September 2008, 222 treatment-naive patients were enrolled and divided into 2 arms: 114 arm A patients were treated with leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan in combination with bevacizumab, and 108 arm B patients were treated as above without bevacizumab. All patients were stage IV with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: The median overall survival of arm A patients was 22.0 months (95% CI: 18.1-25.9) and 25.0 months (CI: 18.1-31.9) for arm B patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 arms (p = 0.1391). No statistically significant difference between the 2 arms regarding the response rate was observed: partial response, 42 patients (36.8%) and 38 patients (35.2%) for arms A and B, respectively. Hematologic toxicity did not differ in the comparison of the 2 arms. Nonhematologic toxicity in arm A involved hypertension in 23 (20.2%) of the patients and proteinuria in 7 (6.1%); 3 patients experienced hemorrhage and 1 patient intestinal perforation. None of these side effects was observed in arm B patients. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference in median overall survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab plus a combination therapy (arm A) and those treated with the combination only, without bevacizumab (arm B), was observed.

Plasma VEGF levels in breast cancer patients with and without metastases.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key mediator of angiogenesis since it stimulates the formation of new blood vessels. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) is related to the promotion of endothelial cells into tube-like structures, and it is therefore expected to promote angiogenesis with a greater potency than VEGF. VEGF and bFGF are considered to be biomarkers that predict treatment effectiveness. Elevated plasma VEGF and bFGF levels have been reported in a variety of different malignant tumors, and patients with metastatic disease have also been reported to present with higher serum VEGF and bFGF levels. Other studies have documented controversial results with respect to the prognostic and predictive value of the aforementioned biomarkers. This study aimed to determine the plasma VEGF and bFGF levels in breast cancer patients without metastatic disease compared with breast cancer patients with advanced metastatic disease. The study included 93 patients with breast cancer, 46 without recurrent disease (group A) and 47 with metastatic disease (group B), as well as 21 healthy individuals. The median age was 58 years (range 34-78) for group A and 59 years (range 37-75) for group B. All 93 patients underwent chemotherapy, adjuvant for group A, and adjuvant plus chemotherapy for group B patients with advanced disease. Plasma VEGF and bFGF levels were determined using a quantitative sandwich immunoassay, and samples were tested in triplicate (ELISA). The plasma levels of VEGF and bFGF varied greatly, i.e., from extremely low to extremely high in the two groups, as well as in the healthy individuals. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups or between the patients and healthy individuals. Data of the present study therefore showed that VEGF and bFGF levels are not valuable biomarkers for predicting treatment outcome.

Discovery of the mitotic selective chromatid segregation phenomenon and its implications for vertebrate development.

The asymmetric cell division process is required for cellular differentiation and embryonic development. Recent evidence obtained in Drosophila and C. elegans suggest that this process occurs by non-equivalent distribution of proteins or mRNA (intrinsic factors) to daughter cells, or by their differential exposure to cell extrinsic factors. In contrast, haploid fission yeast sister cells developmentally differ by inheriting sister chromatids that are differentiated by epigenetic means. Specifically, the act of DNA replication at the mating-type locus in yeast switches it's alternate alleles only in one specific member of chromosome 2 sister chromatids in nearly every chromosome replication cycle. To employ this kind of mechanism for cellular differentiation, strictly based on Watson-Crick structure of DNA in diploid organism, selective segregation mechanism is required to coordinate distribution of potentially differentiated sister chromatids to daughter cells. Genetic evidence to this postulate was fortuitously provided by the analysis of mitotic recombinants of chromosome 7 in mouse cells. Remarkably, the biased segregation occurs in some cell types but not in others and the process seems to be chromosome-specific. This review summarizes the discovery of selective chromatid segregation phenomenon and it suggests that such a process of Somatic Sister chromatid Imprinting and Selective chromatid Segregation (SSIS model) might explain development in eukaryotes, such as that of the body axis left-right visceral organs laterality specification in mice.

Differences in gene expression between individuals with multiple primary and single primary malignancies.

Cytogenetic and molecular studies have identified imbalanced chromosomal regions leading to the characterization of several candidate genes. Differences in gene expression were examined in the blood by whole genome microarray analysis among individuals with double or single primary malignancies and healthy individuals. Twenty-four individuals with at least two primary malignancies of the breast and/or colon and/or ovary were compared with 32 individuals with single breast, colon or ovarian cancer. The single malignancy group had a median duration of disease of 9 years (range 5-23 years). Validation was obtained by examining each patient separately with quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis for the determined genes. Overall a large number of genes were determined to be deregulated. From the classifiers built, a 9-probe signature was determined between second primary and single tumor patients. Four other genes were determined to be repressed (p<1x10(-4)) in individuals with two primary malignancies when compared with individuals with a single malignancy and also when comparing single malignancies and healthy subjects. The levels of gene deregulation were confirmed by validation with quantitative RT-PCR analysis. Functional analysis, suggested that these genes are associated with protein biosynthesis and folding, inhibition of apoptosis and intracellular signalling via GTP cascade. The outcome of the present study was 13 genes had a statistically significant difference in expression between individuals with double primary malignancies compared to individuals with single primary malignancies. Nine of those were confirmed by the classifier analysis.

Identification of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic alterations in Greek breast cancer moderate-risk and low-risk individuals--correlation with clinicopathological data.

The current study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Greek moderate- and low-risk individuals with respect to clinicopathological phenotype and clinical outcome of breast cancer. Ninety-four consecutive individuals were prospectively recruited from two University Breast Cancer Clinics (Hippokrateion Hospitan and Laikon Hospital) between 1989 and 1999 and were categorized as moderate-risk and low-risk individuals for carrying BRCA1/2 germline mutations. To identify the underlying mutations, protein-truncation test and single-strand conformation polymorphism methods were used, followed by direct sequencing. Three novel BRCA1 missense mutations, one novel BRCA1 intronic deletion, three novel (previously reported) BRCA2 truncating mutations, and one novel BRCA2 missense mutation were identified in the moderate-risk group of individuals studied. The BRCA1/2 missense mutations as well as the single intronic variant identified were designated as unclassified genetic variants. Two BRCA1 unclassified genetic variants (missense mutations) were detected in two of the three (66.7%) male breast cancer patients analyzed, while the third one was identified in a sporadic (low-risk) breast cancer patient. Clinicopathological characteristics of breast carcinomas originating from BRCA1/2 heterozygotes were consistent with those already reported and not different from those observed in BRCA1/2 mutation (-) breast cancer patients. Furthermore, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers presented an excellent 4.5-year overall survival (100%). Our results reveal the unique characteristics of BRCA1/2 mutation status, genotype-phenotype correlations, and prognosis, in moderate- and low-risk individuals of Greek ancestry. Breast cancer due to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes appears to be a heterogeneous syndrome in the Greek population.

Prognostic significance of circulating antibodies against carcinoembryonic antigen (anti-CEA) in patients with colon cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The discovery of antibodies against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in patients with digestive cancers, in the late 1970s, initiated a number of studies on the role of these antibodies in patients with cancers of the GI tract. Our aim was to determine the prevalence and prognostic significance of the IgG and IgM anti-CEA antibodies in the serum of patients with colon cancer. METHODS: Using an enzyme-linked immunoassay, the sera of 58 colon cancer patients were examined for the presence of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and for circulating antibodies against the CEA (anti-CEA). An inhibition assay was carried out for the determination of the specificity of the IgG and IgM anti-CEA antibodies. RESULTS: The CEA was elevated (> or =10 ng/ml) in only 12 patients (20.6%). Anti-CEA IgM and/or IgG antibodies were detected in 46 patients with colon cancer (79.1%). In the control group (n = 28), 10% of the individuals had detectable amounts of IgG and/or IgM anti-CEA antibodies. Patients with detectable amounts of circulating IgM anti-CEA antibodies (n = 14, 30.5%) had a statistically significantly better 2-yr survival compared to the rest of the patients (p = 0.017). The IgM anti-CEA antibodies can also be used as an independent prognostic factor in these patients (p = 0.0323). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a high number of colon cancer patients have circulating anti-CEA antibodies in their sera. These may be used as diagnostic markers and as independent prognostic factors. In addition, the presence of these antibodies in the patients studied is associated with better prognosis and significantly increased 2-yr survival. It was also found that the anti-CEA antibodies (IgG and IgM) are more sensitive markers than CEA. These findings underline the biological importance of the anti-CEA antibodies and provide additional information on their potential use as markers of the immune status in patients with colon cancer.