European and American suspected and confirmed pulmonary embolism populations: comparison and analysis.

BACKGROUND: If the prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) differs significantly between the US and Europe, this observation could reduce the generalizability of diagnostic protocols for PE derived in either location. OBJECTIVE: To determine possible causes and potential clinical consequences of these PE prevalence differences. METHODS: Secondary analysis of three prospectively collected multicenter samples (two French and one from the US) including 3174 European and 7940 American PE-suspected patients in Emergency departments (ED) (117 for Europe and 12 for US). Comparison of clinical features, resource use and outcomes of European- and US-suspected PE populations in ED. RESULTS: European patients evaluated for PE were significantly older and had a higher clinical pretest probability (CPP) for PE. The final PE prevalence was significantly higher in Europe, in the overall sample (26.5% vs. 7.6%) and in each level of CPP. Suspected European patients categorized as low CPP had a higher posttest probability than US low CPP patients. Suspected US patients categorized as high CPP had a much lower posttest probability of PE than in Europe. The mean number of tests performed for one PE diagnosis was lower in Europe (7.4 vs. 21.6). Among patients diagnosed with PE, European patients had a higher mean severity of illness score and a higher PE-mortality rate (3.4% vs. 0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients suspected of a PE and those ultimately diagnosed with a PE, European patients had higher acuity, a higher pretest probability and worse outcome than US patients. The present study underscores the importance of disease prevalence for pretest probability scoring approaches and for significance interpretation of imaging tests.

[Validation of an emergency care physician training program "two-point flash US"]. / Validation d'une formation des urgentistes au flash-écho-deux points (FEDP).

BACKGROUND: The development of a short training program for emergency care physicians for rapid ultrasound assessment of two points (the groin and popliteal areas) could be useful for later implementation of a safe home care strategy for patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis before the results of a complete duplex-Doppler exploration are available. PURPOSE: Validation of the proposed training program by studying inter-operator agreement (trainee versus vascular physician) in a multicentric assessment of 60 emergency care physicians. Establish the learning curve. METHODOLOGY: Theoretical training: two-page document with schematic drawings and consultation of image bank on the Web. Practical training: 25 patients in all, the last 15 as an independent operator, writing a standardized report. Interoperator agreement: (a) centralized data collection and independent analysis of the report written by the trainee and a vascular physician for the same patients (n(o) 11 to 25); (b) determination of the coefficient of variance, kappa, and construction of the learning curve (900 agreement points for 60 trainees). INCLUSION CRITERIA: (a) Treated distal or proximal thrombosis recruited by the vascular physician (blinded to the result of the flash US); patient's oral consent. EXPECTED RESULTS: Learning curve leveling off at about the 20th patient with a kappa>0.61 or even 0.80. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION OF THE PROJECT: (a) Prospective, multicentric, blinded study: (i) confirming the feasibility of a two-point venous ultrasound performed by emergency care physicians; (ii) validation of the contents and duration of a short simplified training program; (b) Validation of a decision criterion for home care; If validated, this type of training program might be applied in other disciplines (intensive care, geriatrics).