Evaluation of respiratory muscle strength by randomized controlled trial comparing thoracoscopy, transaxillary thoracotomy, and posterolateral thoracotomy for lung biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate that the postoperative recovery of respiratory muscle strength is better in patients who undergo video-thoracoscopy than in patients who undergo transaxillary thoracotomy or posterolateral thoracotomy. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with three parallel groups. STUDY POPULATION: Eligible patients had undergone wedge resection for lung biopsy in interstitial lung disease or in pulmonary nodule. Twenty-four patients were randomly assigned to one of the three thoracic procedures: eight in the video-thoracoscopy (VT) group, eight in the transaxillary thoracotomy (TT) group, and eight in the posterolateral thoracotomy (PLT) group. MEASUREMENTS: The postoperative respiratory muscle strength was assessed by maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) measured by mouth pressure. Measurements were made the day before the operation and 2, 4, and 30 days after the operation. Changes in postoperative MIP and MEP were expressed as a percentage of preoperative values. RESULTS: The three groups were comparable with respect to age, gender, comorbidity, preoperative spirometry, preoperative MIP, MEP and peak flow, and volume of lung tissue. At 2, 4, and 30 days after the operation, mean MIP were, respectively, 111+/-22%, 119+/-22%, and 124+/-22% in the VT group, 76+/-22%, 109+/-22%, and 127+/-22% in the TT group, and 51+/-22%, 50+/-22%, and 77+/-22% in the PLT group (p<0.0001). At 2, 4, and 30 days after the operation, mean MEP were, respectively, 94+/-15%, 103+/-15%, and 105+/-15% in the VT group, 61+/-15%, 98+/-15%, and 126+/-15% in the TT group, and 62+/-15%, 75+/-15%, and 87+/-15% in the PLT group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Video-thoracoscopy allows better recovery of respiratory muscle function after surgery than posterolateral thoracotomy. However, at 4 and 30 days after surgery, video-thoracoscopy and transaxillary thoracotomy gave similar results of impairment of respiratory muscle strength.

Anticipated detection of imminent surgeon-patient barrier breaches. A prospective randomized controlled trial using an indicator underglove system.

The double gloving indicator underglove system (IUS) is based on a colored detection of the outer glove perforation. Our objective was to determine the IUS efficiency to detect outer glove perforations and to reduce the risks of blood and body fluids exposure, warning the surgeon before the breach of the surgeon-patient barrier (SPB). A series of 100 visceral surgical procedures were randomly assigned to either double (IUS) or single gloving. The noticed glove perforations (using the water test method) and the IUS efficiency were analyzed in 99 procedures. In 49 single-gloving procedures, 19 perforations were noticed: one was immediately perceived (perceived accidental exposure, PAE); 3 were discovered as the gloves were being removed, and 15 were undetected before the water test (unperceived prolonged contact, UPC). In 50 double-gloving procedures (IUS), 16 perforations were noticed, all of them involving only the outer glove: the IUS allowed immediate detection of 3 perforations without any blood exposure; 13 other perforations went undetected but without any UPC. In conjunction with the protective quality of double gloving, the IUS allows detection of significant breaches of the outer glove before the breach of the SPB.