Abdominal wall dimensions and umbilical position vary widely with BMI and should be taken into account when choosing port locations.

BACKGROUND: Many surgeons rely on the umbilicus when determining the location of ports for laparoscopic procedures and falsely assume that it is located in the vertical midline. The purpose of this study was to assess the degree of variation in umbilical position and abdominal dimensions in the general population. METHODS: Torso length, abdominal girth, weight, and height were recorded for 259 patients over a 9-month period. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and used to classify patients into four groups: underweight, normal, overweight, and obese. RESULTS: Average umbilical position for all BMI groups was below the true vertical midpoint and dropped further caudally as BMI increased. In addition, average abdominal dimensions increased with increasing BMI. There was no statistical difference between males and females in each BMI group regarding umbilical position or abdominal dimensions. CONCLUSION: There is a clear relationship between increasing BMI and a drop in umbilical position as well as an increase in abdominal dimensions. We recommend determining umbilical position and abdominal dimensions prior to placing ports and shifting port positions toward target quadrants.

A preliminary prospective study of the usefulness of a magnetic endoscope locating device during colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Although magnetic endoscope imaging of the colonoscope via the Endoscope Positioning Detecting Unit (EPDU) has been studied to some extent in Europe, its application in the United States has been limited. The purposes of this study were to determine whether the technique enabled for accurate localization of the lesion and to determine if and how the device facilitated scope insertion and completion of the colonoscopic exam. METHODS: Outpatient colonoscopies using the EPDU were performed by three experienced surgical endoscopists over a 5-month period. A specialized scope with electromagnetic coils or a regular scope with a magnetic probe insert in the instrument channel was used for the duration of the examination to identify loops and localize pathology. RESULTS: A total of 80 colonoscopies were performed with the device. In two patients, the probe insert was removed prior to completion of the procedure; thus, the total number of examinations included in the study was 78. The EPDU was used in conjunction with transillumination to estimate the location of polyps or cancers in the 33 patients (42%) in whom such lesions were found. In the four patients who subsequently underwent operation, the lesion's location as estimated by EPDU was verified. In regard to the usefulness of the device during insertion, the EPDU led to the discovery of loops and to the application of pressure that resulted in prompt completion of the examination in 28% of cases (deemed most useful). In 33% of cases, the device identified loops and led to the application of abdominal wall pressure and early position changes, thus facilitating the examination; however it did not lead to its immediate or rapid completion. In 39% of cases, the device was not required or used for insertion due to the simple nature of the examination. CONCLUSIONS: The EPDU was accurate in estimating lesion location. The device also holds promise as an aid in the completion of difficult exams (about 30% of cases in this study).

Does better functional result equate with better quality of life? Implications for surgical treatment in familial adenomatous polyposis.

PURPOSE: The main impetus for a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis to choose colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis over ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the better functional result. However, does better functional result necessarily translate into better overall quality of life? Previous studies of other diseases have demonstrated no such correlation. This study was performed to determine whether any relationship exists between functional result and quality of life in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after ileorectal anastomosis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: All patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who underwent colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis from 1980 to 1998 were studied. Functional data were obtained by questionnaire. Health-related quality of life was assessed by two validated instruments, the SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales and the SF-36 Health Survey, which measure physical and mental functioning and eight separate health-quality dimensions, including health perception, physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, mental health, bodily pain, and energy or fatigue. RESULTS: Data were obtained in 44 of 68 patients, 14 with ileorectal anastomosis and 30 with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. No differences were demonstrated between the two groups for patient age, mean follow-up time, and mean patient age at operation. Functional results were worse for the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis group vs. the ileorectal anastomosis group in number of bowel movements per day (7.5 vs. 5.2; P < 0.05), leakage (43 vs. 0 percent; P < 0.01), pad usage (17 vs. 0 percent; P < 0.01), perianal skin problems (33 vs. 7 percent; P < 0.01), food avoidance (80 vs. 43 percent; P < 0.01), and inability to distinguish gas (37 vs. 7 percent; P < 0.01). Results of the health-related quality-of-life surveys, however, demonstrated no difference between the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis groups. The Physical and Mental summary scales for the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis groups were not significantly different (Physical Health Scale, 50.3 vs. 50.9; Mental Health Scale, 51.7 vs. 49.6), and none of the eight dimensions of the SF-36 health survey demonstrated statistical differences between the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis groups. CONCLUSION: Better functional results were not equated with better quality of life in this pilot study. Although patients with the ileorectal anastomosis have better functional results than those with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, the measured health-related quality of life as determined by a validated generic health-related quality-of-life instrument is the same for both groups. These results suggest that all patients with familial adenomatous polyposis might be optimally treated with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. More importantly, this study suggests that health-related quality of life should play a greater role in the evaluation of care and treatment in colon rectal surgery.

Admission factors can predict the need for ICU monitoring in gallstone pancreatitis.

The purpose was 1) to prospectively determine the prevalence of adverse events necessitating intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring in gallstone pancreatitis (GP) and 2) To identify admission prognostic indicators that predict the need for ICU unit monitoring. Prospective laboratory data, physiologic parameters, and APACHE II scores were gathered on 102 patients with GP over 14 months. Adverse events were defined as cardiac, respiratory, or renal failure, gastrointestinal bleeding, stroke, sepsis, and necrotizing pancreatitis. Patients were divided into Group 1 (no adverse events, n=95) and Group 2 (adverse events, n=7). There were no deaths and 7 (7%) adverse events, including necrotizing pancreatitis (3), cholangitis (2), and cardiac (2). APACHE 11 > or = 5 (P < 0.005), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) > or = 12 mmol/L (P < 0.005), white blood cell count (WBC) > or = 14.5 x 10(9)/L, (P < 0.001), heart rate > or = 100 bpm (P < 0.001), and glucose > or = 150 mg/dL (P < 0.005) were each independent predictors of adverse events. The sensitivity and specificity of these criteria for predicting severe complications requiring ICU care varied from 71 to 86 per cent and 78 to 87 per cent, respectively. The prevalence of adverse events necessitating ICU care in GP patients is low. Glucose, BUN, WBC, heart rate, and APACHE II scores are independent predictors of adverse events necessitating ICU care. Single criteria predicting the need for ICU care on admission are readily available on admission.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in elderly males with atherosclerosis: the value of physical exam.

The purpose was 1) To assess the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in elderly males with atherosclerosis and 2) to evaluate the value of physical exam (PE) by a vascular surgeon in detecting AAA. A total of ninety-six males older than 55 years referred to vascular surgery clinic with atherosclerotic disease were screened prospectively with PE by a vascular surgeon, followed by ultrasonography (US). Atherosclerosis was documented by ankle brachial index and duplex US. Patients who had recently undergone a vascular procedure, aortography, laparotomy, abdominal computed tomography, or US were excluded. Mean age was 67 years. Patients were 67 per cent Caucasian, 32 per cent black, and 1 per cent Hispanic. Presenting complaints were related to claudication (83%), carotid disease (19%), both (3%), and subclavian stenosis (1%). Patient characteristics included cigarette smoking (85%), hypertension (67%), cardiac disease (51%), diabetes (45%), stroke (18%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8%). One (1%) 3.7 cm AAA was detected by US. Sensitivity of PE was 100 per cent and specificity 92 per cent. Twenty-two (23%) patients were too obese for us to feel the aortic pulse. Screening cost was $14,250. The prevalence of AAA in this population is very low. AAA screening should be reserved for patients with a positive PE or who are too obese for the examiner to feel the aortic pulse.

Alternatives in therapy for low rectal cancer.

Rectal cancer affects 40,000 people annually in the United States. Traditionally, operative therapy has involved abdominoperineal resection. This procedure results in a permanent colostomy and carries a high incidence of impotence and urinary retention. Because of improvements in operative techniques, perioperative care, and adjuvant tumor therapy, less invasive local techniques of tumor resection have become excellent options.