[Treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis - advancements and perspectives]. / Therapie der eosinophilen Ösophagitis - Fortschritte und Perspektiven.

In recent years significant progress has been made in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), especially in the area of topical corticosteroids. Novel EoE-specific formulations have been developed and first approvals have been obtained for induction and maintenance of remission in adult EoE patients with the orodispersible budesonide tablet in Germany and other European and non-EU countries. A novel budesonide oral suspension is currently under priority review by the FDA for first approval in the U.S. In contrast, the scientific evidence on the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors remains limited. Moreover, new biologicals have been identified which showed promising results in phase 2 trials and are now being studied in phase 3. This article aims to summarize and discuss recent advances and perspectives in the treatment of EoE.

Whipple's Disease - delay of diagnosis by immunosuppressive therapy; a case-series report.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for the development of Whipple's disease (WD) are largely unknown. Case reports, case series, and reviews suggest immunosuppressive therapy as a potential triggering factor in WD. The low incidence of WD and non-specific symptoms at disease onset contribute to the frequent delay of diagnosis. We describe our centre´s experience on differences in the clinical presentation of patients with classic WD compared to patients with "masked" WD because of immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, 8 patients were included. Diagnosis of WD was confirmed by histological staining of duodenal biopsies revealing T. whipplei within foamy macrophages or by PCR- based detection of specific T. whipplei DNA. Clinical manifestations, laboratory data, and medication have been recorded over a period of 19 years. Subgroup analyses for the two different variants of WD were performed. RESULTS: Seven of eight patients were initially diagnosed with rheumatic disease (polyarthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica). One patient was correctly diagnosed at the beginning without any medication. Three patients were on immunosuppressive therapy and being treated with disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs), three patients were receiving low-dose cortisone in combination with non-steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and one patient was receiving NSAIDs only. All patients presented with increased parameters of inflammation and with clinical and/or laboratory signs of a malabsorption. From the onset of first symptoms, diagnosis of WD took a median of 36 months (range: 6-120 months). The time between onset of joint complaints and onset of gastrointestinal symptoms was 36 months (range: 0-117 months). WD patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, compared to those not receiving it, had a longer duration of gastrointestinal symptoms (12 months versus 6 months) and reported a greater weight loss (20,3 kg versus 7,8 kg) up to diagnosis of WD. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressive drugs may delay the diagnosis of WD and prolong the course of T. whipplei infection with deterioration of clinical symptoms. If a patient with rheumatic complaints develops gastrointestinal symptoms, diagnosis of WD should be considered and proper diagnostic investigation carried out.

[Ligandrol-induced liver injury - Case Report]. / Ligandrol-induzierte toxische Hepatopathie ­ ein Fallbericht.

A 37-year-old man presented with painless jaundice and pruritus. Total Bilirubin was 30-fold the upper limit of normal (ULN), while ALT and further cholestasis parameters were found to be only slightly elevated. As comprehensive diagnostics showed no abnormal findings and ruled out frequent causes of elevated cholestasis markers, we performed a liver biopsy. The biopsy revealed canalicular cholestasis with ductopenia and periportal fibrosis. Only after a further and intensive anamnesis a ligandrol-abuse could be determined as cause for the symptoms. Ligandrol is misused as a selective androgen receptor modulator to promote muscle building. This case represents a typical case of abuse of anabolic substances in amateur sports.

Validation of the German Inflammatory Bowel Disease Fatigue (IBD-F) Questionnaire.

INTRODUCTION: Fatigue is a common symptom in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). To date, there is no instrument to assess IBD-specific fatigue in German. The aim of this study was to translate the IBD Fatigue (IBD-F) scale and to test its psychometric properties in a German IBD population. METHODS: After completing the translation process, 20 IBD patients participated in a pilot testing phase. For further analyses, 180 IBD patients with fatigue answered the IBD-F (Sections I, II, III) and the IBD Questionnaire (IBDQ-D). Reliability was tested by using Cronbach's alpha and corrected item-total correlation. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were carried out. Spearman's correlation was calculated between the IBD-F and IBDQ-D . 78 patients could be included to calculate the test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The German version of the IBD-F shows high face and content validity. Internal consistency was excellent, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93-0.98. Corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.51 to 0.89. The correlation between the IBD-F and the IBDQ-D was statistically significant for Section I (rs=-0.59; p<0.01) and Section II (rs=-0.76; p<0.01) of the IBD-F. The EFA identified one relevant factor for each section. Test-retest reliability was acceptable for Section I (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.73) and Section II (ICC=0.84). CONCLUSION: The German version of the IBD-F is a reliable and valid tool to assess fatigue in IBD.

Monitoring Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Routine Clinical Practice - International Expert Recommendations.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There are no studies or recommendations on optimal monitoring strategies for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Our objective was to develop guidance on how to monitor patients with EoE in routine clinical practice, on the basis of available clinical evidence and expert opinion. METHODS: A multidisciplinary, international group of EoE experts identified the following important 3 questions during several consensus meetings: why, by what means, and when to monitor patients with EoE. A steering committee was named, and 3 teams were formed to review literature and to formulate statements for each topic. In a Delphi survey, a level of agreement of ≥75% was defined as threshold value for acceptance. In a final conference, results were presented, critical points and comments on the statements were discussed, and statements were rephrased/rewritten if necessary. RESULTS: Eighteen EoE experts (14 adult and pediatric gastroenterologists, 2 pathologists and 2 allergists) with a median of 21.7 years in clinical practice, mostly academic or university-based, completed the Delphi survey, which included 11 statements and a proposed algorithm for monitoring patients with EoE. Each statement attained ≥75% agreement. Participants discussed and debated mostly about the statement concerning surveillance intervals for EoE patients with stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that effective maintenance treatment probably reduces the development of EoE complications, and regular, structured, and, under certain conditions, individualized clinical follow-up is recommended to assess disease activity while opening a window to monitoring side effects, adjusting therapy, and encouraging adherence to treatment. Follow-up should comprise symptom assessment and periodic or repeated endoscopy with histological assessment in specific EoE settings.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: Comparison of clinical, endoscopic and histological scoring systems.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) has received increasing attention as a disease entity, and it is now recognized as an important disorder of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract. Topical corticosteroids (tCS) are effective in clinical-pathological remission induction (RI) and remission maintenance (RM) of active EoE. With scoring systems, such as clinical (SDI), endoscopic (EREFS), and histological (EoEHSS) systems, EoE can be graded, and its disease activity can be assessed. OBJECTIVE: To discover how closely results within each of the three scoring systems SDI, EREFS, and EoEHSS are correlated between initial diagnosis (ID), RI, and RM, and to determine how well scores from the three systems are intercorrelated at each time point. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of patients with active EoE was performed between 2006 and 2020, with follow-up for up to 6 years. SDI, EREFS and EoEHSS scores were recorded at ID, at RI, and in RM. Evaluation employed descriptive statistics, the Friedman test, and Bonferroni-corrected post hoc pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: At RI 29 and at RM 19 EoE patients provided data. Significant correlations were found between EREFS and EoEHSS at RI and in RM. Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between ID and RI for SDI, for EREFS, and for EoEHSS. CONCLUSION: The scoring systems tested did not show intercorrelation at ID. Comparison revealed significant differences for SDI, EREFS, and EoEHSS between the systems at ID und RI, but not in RM, during tCS treatment. These results underline the efficacy of tCS (at RI and RM) in the treatment of active EoE.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination does not induce relapses of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is a promising strategy to protect immunocompromised IBD patients from a severe course of COVID-19. As these patients were excluded from initial clinical vaccination trials, patients frequently express concerns regarding the safety of these vaccines, especially whether vaccination might trigger IBD flares ("hit-and-run-hypothesis"). METHODS: In order to assess the risk of an IBD flare after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, an anonymous survey was performed at five German IBD centers and one patient organization (Deutsche Morbus Crohn/Colitis ulcerosa Vereinigung (DCCV) e.V.) in August and October 2021. RESULTS: The questionnaire was answered by 914 patients, 781 of whom reported a previous vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 (85.4%). Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 was not associated with an increased risk of IBD flares (p=0.319) or unscheduled visits to the IBD physician (p=0.848). Furthermore, typical symptoms of an IBD flare including abdominal pain, increases in stool frequency, or rectal bleeding were not influenced by the vaccination. CONCLUSION: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is safe in IBD patients. These results may help to reduce fears regarding the vaccination in IBD patients. Our results can help to reduce fears in IBD patients regarding the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. A close communication between patients and physicians before and after the vaccination may be beneficial.

[Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Symptoms and Therapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease]. / Auswirkungen einer SARS-CoV-2-Infektion auf Symptomatik und Therapie chronisch-entzündlicher Darmerkrankungen.

INTRODUCTION: The influence of a SARS-CoV-2 infection on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not yet been well characterized and it is unclear whether this requires an adaptation of the immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: A national register was established for the retrospective documentation of clinical parameters and changes in immunosuppressive therapy in SARS-CoV-2 infected IBD patients. RESULTS: In total, only 3 of 185 IBD patients (1.6 %) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection because of abdominal symptoms. In the course of COVID-19 disease, 43.5 % developed diarrhea, abdominal pain or hematochezia (risk of hospitalization with vs. without abdominal symptoms: 20.0 % vs. 10.6 %, p < 0.01). With active IBD at the time of SARS-CoV-2 detection, there was an increased risk of hospitalization (remission 11.2 %, active IBD 23.3 % p < 0.05). IBD-specific therapy remained unchanged in 115 patients (71.4 %); the most common change was an interruption of systemic therapy (16.2 %). DISCUSSION: New abdominal symptoms often appeared in SARS-CoV-2 infected IBD patients. However, these only rarely led to SARS-CoV-2 testing. A high IBD activity at the time of SARS-CoV-2 detection was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization.

[Eosinophilic Esophagitis Update: New Guidelines of the European Study Group EUREOS]. / Eosinophile Ösophagitis Update 2017: Neue Leitlinien der europäischen Studiengruppe EUREOS.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is now considered to be a frequent chronic esophageal disease and is one of the most common causes for dysphagia and bolus obstruction in children and adults. The increasing significance and new scientific insights in this disorder required an update of currently existing guidelines. Therefore, the European Study Group of Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EUREOS) has elaborated new guidelines for the management of eosinophilic esophagitis, based on a systematic literature search and, for the first time, using the GRADE methodology (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). The aim of the present article is to summarize and comment on new developments and clinical recommendations of this guideline to further increase the awareness for this relevant esophageal disease.

Validation of Two Calprotectin Rapid Tests in Daily Routine.

BACKGROUND: The differentiation of organic and functional intestinal diseases and monitoring of disease activity in inflammatory bowel diseases are frequent challenges in daily clinical routine. Fecal calprotectin is a noninvasive screening marker for intestinal inflammation. Its quantification by ELISA is considered to be the gold standard, but an increasing number of semiquantitative and quantitative point-of-care-tests (POCT) have been launched to optimize the duration between sample input and result. METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of two fecal calprotectin rapid test assays compared to an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as gold-standard considering the costs, time to result, and effort. For this purpose, fecal samples were collected from 68 patients with either confirmed Crohn´s disease (CD) (n = 37), confirmed ulcerative colitis (UC) (n = 21) or with confirmed IBS (n = 10) and analyzed with all three tests. RESULTS: Both rapid tests analyzed in this study revealed a high sensitivity in comparison to ELISA defined as gold standard (93.0 % PreventID®, 99.9 % Quantum Blue). The negative predictive value of Quantum Blue was better than of PreventID® (99.8% vs. 84.2%). When analyzing the capacity of all applied tests to differentiate IBD from IBS, the sensitivity of all three tests was similar, but the ELISA was more specific than the POCTs. The expense of the POCT per sample is significantly above the costs per sample for the ELISA. CONCLUSIONS: Both POCTs, Quantum Blue and PreventID®, provide high diagnostic accuracy and were less time consuming in clinical routine than quantification of fecal calprotectin by ELISA. This makes these tests excellent candidates for the use in clinical routine. The routine application of ELISA techniques for the quantification of fecal calprotectin levels is a valid option in laboratories or clinical departments with high quantities of samples to allow prompt follow up for patient management.