ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the use of the new macrolides (azithromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin) during the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of major malformations. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective multi-center study, pregnancy outcome was compared between pregnant women exposed to one of the new macrolides during the first trimester of pregnancy and two comparison groups one exposed to other antibiotics and the other to other non-teratogenic medications. All women enrolled in the study called one of the three participating teratogen information services (TIS). Group 1 macrolides (n=161), group 2 other antibiotics (n=213) and group 3 non-teratogens (n=740). RESULTS: A total of 161 women exposed to the new macrolides (118 were exposed in the first trimester of pregnancy) and 953 from a comparison groups were followed up. The rate of major malformations in the study group was 4.1% compared to 2.1% in the other antibiotics exposed group (OR=1.41, 95% CI 0.47-4.23) and 3.0% in the non-teratogens exposed group. The rate of elective terminations of pregnancy was significantly higher in the exposed group in compare to both comparison groups. CONCLUSION: Our study, although relatively small sized, suggests that the use of the new macrolides during the first trimester of pregnancy does not represent an increased risk for congenital malformations strong enough for an induced abortion after such an exposure. Elective terminations of pregnancy because of early exposure to these medications should be reconsidered.
Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/etiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Macrolides/adverse effects , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Adult , Female , Humans , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Azathioprine (AZP) interferes with nucleic acid synthesis and is teratogenic in animals. In view of the paucity of information on the use of AZP during pregnancy we investigated this subject in a prospective, controlled, multicenter study. Our objective was too determine whether exposure to AZP during pregnancy increases the risk for major malformations and to determine the effect on pregnancy outcome. METHODS: Pregnant women on AZP who contacted one of seven teratogen information services were compared to a cohort of pregnant women who contacted two of the seven teratogen information services and took nonteratogenic treatments during their pregnancy. RESULTS: Follow-up was completed on 189 women in the AZP group and compared to 230 women in the control group. The rate of major malformations did not differ between groups with six neonates in each; the AZP rate was 3.5% and the control group rate was 3.0% (p = .775; OR 1.17; CI: 0.37, 3.69). The mean birth weight and gestational age were lower in the AZP group (2,995 g vs. 3,252 g [p = .001, difference of mean: 257, 95% CI: 106.3, 408.1] and 37.8 weeks vs. 39.1 weeks [p = .001, difference of mean: 1.3, 95% CI: .5, 2.0], respectively). The AZP group had more cases of prematurity (21.4% vs. 5.2% [p < .001; OR 4.0; 95% CI: 2.0, 8.06]) and low birth weight (23% vs. 6.0% [p < .001; OR 3.81; 95% CI: 2.0, 7.2]). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that AZP (50-100 mg/day) does not triple the rate of birth defects; however, it is associated with lower birth weight, gestational age, and prematurity. Larger studies are needed to confirm these observations.
Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced , Azathioprine/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Live Birth , Premature Birth/chemically induced , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/epidemiology , Animals , Azathioprine/administration & dosage , Case-Control Studies , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Infant, Newborn , Live Birth/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
We examined prospectively the outcome of primary and nonprimary maternal cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection during pregnancy among 88 and 120 women, respectively. The risk for vertical transmission was 1.83x higher for primary infection than for nonprimary infection. Nonetheless, congenital CMV disease was diagnosed in both infection groups at similar rates.