Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 43(3): 453-459, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16520154

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The successful application of endovascular techniques for the elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) has stimulated a strong interest in their possible use in dealing with a long-standing surgical challenge: the ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). The use of a conventional open procedure to repair ruptured aneurysms is associated with a high operative mortality of 45% to 50%. In this study, we evaluated the current frequency of endovascular repair of RAAAs in four large states and the impact of this technique on patient outcome. METHODS: We examined discharge data sets from 2000 through 2003 from the four states of California, Florida, New Jersey, and New York, whose combined population represents almost a third of the United States population. Proportions and trends were analyzed by chi2 analysis and continuous variables by the Student's t test. RESULTS: We found that since the year 2000, endovascular repair has begun to emerge as a viable treatment option for RAAAs, accounting for the repair of 6.2% of cases in 2003. During the same period, the use of open procedures for RAAAs declined. The overall mortality rate for the 4-year period was significantly lower for endovascular vs open repair (39.3% vs. 47.7%, P = .005). Moreover, compared with open repair, endovascular repair resulted in a significantly lower rate of pulmonary, renal, and bleeding complications. Survival after endovascular repair correlated with hospital experience, as assessed by the overall volume of elective and nonelective endovascular procedures. For endovascular repairs, mortality ranged from 45.9% for small volume hospitals to 26% for large volume hospitals (P = .0011). Volume was also a determinant of mortality for open repairs, albeit to a much lesser extent (51.5% for small volume hospitals, 44.3% for large volume hospitals; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: We observed a benefit to using endovascular procedures for RAAAs in institutions with significant endovascular experience; however, the analysis of administrative data cannot rule out selection bias as an explanation of better outcomes. These data strongly endorse the need for prospective studies to clarify to what extent the improved survival in RAAA patients is to be attributed to the endovascular approach rather than the selection of low-risk patients.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Aortic Rupture/mortality , Comorbidity , Humans , Length of Stay , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/mortality , Postoperative Complications , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Am Coll Surg ; 202(2): 247-51, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16427549

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: American Pediatric Surgical Association consensus guidelines for children with blunt spleen injuries have been defined and validated in children's hospitals, but large administrative data sets indicate that only 10% to 15% of children with blunt spleen injuries are treated at children's hospitals. We sought to identify the frequency and compare the treatment of children with spleen injury in hospitals with and without recognized trauma expertise, with the aim of identifying a meaningful target for dissemination of benchmarks and consensus guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: State health departments' administrative data sets from California, Florida, New Jersey, and New York were analyzed for 2000, 2001, and 2002. All children with head injury or other nonspleen abdominal injuries requiring surgery were excluded. Injury Severity Scores were determined by ICDMAP-90. RESULTS: There were 3,232 patients with blunt spleen injury. Trauma centers had a significantly lower rate of operation for both multiply injured patients (15.3% versus 19.3%, p < 0.001) and those with isolated injury (9.2% versus 18.5%, p < 0.0001) when compared with nontrauma centers. The operative rates at both trauma centers and nontrauma centers exceed published American Pediatric Surgical Association benchmarks for all children with spleen injury (5% to 11%) and the subset with isolated spleen injury (0% to 3%). Independent risk factors for splenectomy included ages 15 to 19 years (p < 0.002), spleen injury severity (p < 0.0001), and presence of multiple injuries (p < 0.04). Adjusted odds ratio for risk of splenic operation in all patients with spleen injury was 2.122 (95% CI:1.455- 3.096) when treated at a nontrauma center (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These multistate discharge data indicate that treatment of children with blunt spleen injury differs significantly when comparing trauma centers and nontrauma centers. Because nearly two-thirds of these children were treated at trauma centers, dissemination of American Pediatric Surgical Association guidelines and benchmarks through state or regional trauma systems may reduce the number of children having operations for splenic injury.


Subject(s)
Spleen/injuries , Trauma Centers , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Benchmarking , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors , Splenectomy
3.
J Vasc Surg ; 39(6): 1200-8, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15192558

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To help understand past and future trends in vascular intervention, we examined changes in the rate of utilization, patient demographics, and length of stay from 1980 to 2000. METHODS: We reviewed the ICD-9 codes for all vascular procedures using the National Hospital Discharge Survey of non-federal United States hospitals (1980-2000). RESULTS: The number of vascular procedures performed in this country increased from 412,557 in 1980 to 801,537 in 2000 (per capita increase of >50%). This increase was most evident in elderly patients (>75 years, 67% per capita increase in discharges). Long hospital stays (> or =7 days) for vascular procedures fell 41%, and short hospital stays (<24 hours) increased 15% over the period of study. The frequency of abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs remained relatively constant. Except for an interval in the late 1980s, and a minor decrease from 1997 to 2000, the frequency of carotid endartarectomy rose dramatically (69%). Lower extremity revascularizations increased steadily until 1990 but then declined 12%. From 1995 to 2000, there was a 27% per capita decrease in the number of renal-mesenteric operations. Correspondingly, over the past 5 years there has been a 979% growth in the number of percutaneous/endovascular interventions. Despite a substantial number of interventions for lower extremity vascular disease, there was a concomitant increase in the number of major and minor amputations. CONCLUSION: Interventions for vascular disease have increased dramatically, with a major shift toward less invasive treatments, particularly for the renal and mesenteric vessels and the lower extremities. These trends in procedural use suggest that vascular surgeons need to embrace catheter-based approaches if they want to remain leaders in the treatment of peripheral vascular diseases.


Subject(s)
Comprehension , Inpatients , Vascular Surgical Procedures/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Length of Stay/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission/trends , Patient Discharge/trends , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Vascular Surgical Procedures/classification
4.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 28(9): 931-9; discussion 940, 2003 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12942010

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A national hospitalization database was used to determine rates and trends in the treatment of cervical disc disease. OBJECTIVE: To examine the temporal and geographic variations in hospitalizations and surgical procedures for cervical disc disease. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies of spinal surgery during the 1980s showed significant increases in the rates for all procedures, particularly those involving fusion. The management of cervical disc disease continues to be controversial. METHODS: Data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey from 1990 through 1999 were analyzed. Records were selected and categorized according to an algorithm of International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) procedure and diagnosis codes. RESULTS: During the study period, the rate of hospitalization for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of cervical disc disease did not increase significantly. There was, however, a statistically significant increase in the proportion of hospitalizations for the surgical treatment of cervical disc disease that included a fusion procedure. There also was significant geographic variation in the rate of fusion procedures, with the South having the highest rate. CONCLUSIONS: Although the rate of surgery for cervical disc disease did not increase significantly during the 1990s, the rate of fusion procedures did rise significantly.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Diskectomy/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Spinal Fusion/statistics & numerical data , Age Distribution , Algorithms , Bone Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Intervertebral Disc/surgery , Logistic Models , Male , Neck , Odds Ratio , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Sex Distribution , Spinal Diseases/surgery , Transplantation, Autologous/statistics & numerical data , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...