Efficacy of the influenza vaccine in patients with malignant lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The benefits and efficacy of the influenza vaccine have been controversial and have had mixed reviews in the recent literature. Immunosuppressed patients and those receiving chemotherapy are particularly at risk for infectious complications and are therefore given high priority to receiving prophylactic vaccines. METHOD: We administered the influenza vaccine to 29 patients with malignant lymphoma who were receiving chemotherapy or had recently completed therapy during the flu season of 2003-2004. An aged-matched control group received the same vaccine during the same period. The ability of both groups to mount a protective titer of antibodies to the antigens in the vaccine was measured. RESULTS: Three of 29 patients (10%) in the lymphoma group were able to mount a 4-fold titer to at least one of the influenza A antigens. One patient developed a protective titer to both influenza A and B antigens and 3 of 29 responded to the influenza B antigen. In the control group 13 of 29 (45%) responded to an influenza A antigen and 14 of 29 (48%) had a 4-fold response to the B antigen. Seven of 29 controls (24%) had a 4-fold increase in their titers to both the A and B antigens. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the low incidence of response or efficacy to the influenza vaccine reported in previous studies. Only a small percentage (10%) of immunosuppressed patients with malignant lymphoma responded with a 4-fold increase in their antibody titer to the major antigens of the 2003 influenza vaccine. Most interestingly, less than 50% of the aged-matched control population studied responded with a 4-fold increase in their antibody titer. Additional studies are needed to determine methods for improving the efficacy of the vaccine and the effectiveness of the influenza vaccination program in preventing influenza infections in the United States.

Disorders of flushing.

Disorders of flushing encompass a broad spectrum of diverse acquired and inherited conditions. Chemical mediators involved in the flushing response are incompletely understood. Flushing episodes rarely can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The goal of the physician is to separate benign from potentially life-threatening conditions. Accurate diagnosis requires a thorough history and physical examination emphasizing the age of the patient, temporal association of flushing with occupation, environmental, stress, food, or drug exposure, and the duration of the episode. In some cases, despite a thorough evaluation, the etiology for flushing remains unknown. Understanding the distinct mechanisms that lead to flushing helps provide a rational approach to treatment.

Immunization recommendations for adults with cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature on immunizing nonbone marrow transplant adult cancer patients, summarize the findings, and make recommendations for the use of vaccines in this population. DATA SOURCE: A search of MEDLINE and CancerLit was conducted (1966-June 2001) to find English-language clinical studies and review articles pertaining to immunization, vaccines, and cancer in humans. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices were used extensively. References of each identified article were subsequently reviewed for additional relevant articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Representative epidemiologic reports, clinical trials, and recommendations of expert panels are summarized in this report. Relevant information was selected to describe the epidemiology of vaccine-preventable diseases, efficacy of the vaccines, and recommendations specific to adults with cancer. DATA SYNTHESIS: In general, adults with cancer are at least at the same risk of infection with vaccine-preventable diseases as are healthy populations. Because of their compromised immune function, many patients who have undergone cancer treatment are specifically at increased risk of morbidity and mortality associated with measles and varicella infections. Asplenic patients with lymphoma are at increased risk of fulminant bacterial infections. Influenza infection is associated with significant morbidity in cancer patients. Although the protection conferred by immunization is lower in immunosuppressed patients with cancer, immunization with inactivated vaccines is indicated. Live vaccines should not be used except in very rare instances. CONCLUSIONS: Immunization of adults with cancer is a critical component of their care. Although additional research is necessary, following established recommendations may protect individuals with malignancies from significant morbidity and mortality associated with vaccine-preventable diseases.