Tear Cytokines as Predictive Biomarkers of Success in Contact Lens Discomfort Management.

PURPOSE: To analyze changes in tear levels of inflammatory mediators in symptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers after refitting with daily disposable CLs and to identify potential biomarkers of success in CL discomfort (CLD) management. METHODS: Symptomatic CL wearers (CLDEQ-8 ≥ 12) were refitted (V1) with daily disposable CLs (Delefilcon A). After one month (V2), participants were classified into the post-fitting non-symptomatic (CLDEQ <12) and symptomatic (CLDEQ ≥12) groups. At each visit, the participants were clinically evaluated, tears were collected, and 20 inflammatory mediators and substance P (SP) were measured using multiplex immunobead analysis and ELISA, respectively. The detection rates and concentrations were compared between visits and groups, and logistic regression models were performed. RESULTS: Forty-three subjects (32 women/11 men; mean age: 23.2 ± 4.9 years) were enrolled. The IL-1ß and IL-9 detection rates were higher at V2 (p ≤ 0.044). The detection rates of IL-1ß, IL-9, MIP-1α/CCL3, and MMP-9 at V1 (p ≤ 0.045) and IL-17A at V2 (p ≤ 0.014) were higher in the post-fitting symptomatic group. The tear IL-9 concentration was increased at V2 (p = 0.018). The tear concentrations of fractalkine/CX3CL1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, MCP-3/CCL7, MIP-1ß, NGF, RANTES/CCL5, and TNF-α were higher in the post-fitting symptomatic group (p ≤ 0.044). Additionally, levels of fractalkine/CX3CL1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, RANTES/CCL5, and TNF-α at V1 were significantly associated with the post-fitting grouping (p ≤ 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Low tear concentrations of specific inflammatory mediators may be used as a predictive biomarker of success for refitting symptomatic CL wearers with daily disposable CLs. However, complementary treatments might be required for symptomatic CL wearers with higher levels of these inflammatory molecules.

Gene expression changes in conjunctival cells associated with contact lens wear and discomfort.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the differences in the expression of pain-related genes in conjunctival epithelial cells among symptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers (SCLWs), asymptomatic CL wearers (ACLWs), and non-CL wearers (non-CLWs). METHODS: For this study, 60 participants (20 non-CLWs, 40 CLWs) were enrolled. The CLW group comprised 20 ACLWs and 20 SCLWs according to the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire short form©. Conjunctival cells were collected using impression cytology, and RNA was isolated and used to determine the expression levels of 85 human genes involved in neuropathic and inflammatory pain. The effects of CL wear and discomfort were evaluated using mixed-effects ANOVA with partially nested fixed-effects model. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed to assign biological meaning to sets of differentially expressed genes. RESULTS: Six genes (CD200, EDN1, GRIN1, PTGS1, P2RX7, and TNF) were significantly upregulated in CLWs compared to non-CLWs. Eleven genes (ADORA1, BDKRB1, CACNA1B, DBH, GRIN1, GRM1, HTR1A, PDYN, PTGS1, P2RX3, and TNF) were downregulated in SCLWs compared to ACLWs. These genes were mainly related to pain, synaptic transmission and signaling, ion transport, calcium transport and concentration, and cell-cell signaling. CONCLUSIONS: CL wear modified the expression of pain- and inflammation-related genes in conjunctival epithelial cells. These changes may be in part, along with other mechanisms, responsible for CL discomfort in SCLWs.

Is contact lens discomfort related to meibomian gland morphology?

PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between contact lens (CL) discomfort and meibomian gland (MG) morphology assessed by a semi-objective software in subjects without an alteration of MG function (meibum quality and expressibility). METHODS: Nineteen symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 ≥ 12) CL wearers, 19 asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 < 12) wearers, and 22 non-wearers were recruited. Upper and lower eyelid meibography images were taken and the following parameters were analysed using a semi-objective software in the central 2/3 of each eyelid: number of MG, number of partial MG, percentage of MG loss and percentage of tortuosity. One-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis H test were used for comparisons among groups. The relationships between CLDEQ-8 and MG morphology parameters were analysed using the Spearman correlation coefficient and multivariable linear regression models. RESULTS: No significant differences were found among groups in the MG morphology of the upper or lower eyelids. In all CL wearers, a significant correlation with CLDEQ-8 was found in the upper eyelid for the number of MG (rho = 0.47, p = 0.003). In symptomatic wearers, significant correlations with CLDEQ-8 were found in the lower eyelid for the number of partial MG (rho = 0.49, p = 0.03) and the percentage of partial MG (rho = 0.61, p = 0.005). In all CL wearers, multivariable models were fitted to explain CLDEQ-8 score including the number of MG, the number of partial MG and the percentage of MG loss from the lower eyelid (R2 = 0.19; p = 0.007), and the number of MG from the upper eyelid (R2 = 0.19; p = 0.001). In symptomatic wearers, a model was fitted including the percentage of MG loss from the lower eyelid (R2 = 0.30; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Alterations of MG morphology, without clinically apparent alteration of MG function, can be involved in causing CL discomfort and influence the degree of symptoms. The differences in findings between eyelids indicate the need to monitor both eyelids, especially the lower one, in CL wearers.

Design of a questionnaire for detecting contact lens discomfort: the Contact Lens Discomfort Index.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Questionnaires can provide unique information regarding the status of a condition from the perspective of the patient. Contact lens (CL) discomfort (CLD) is a condition subjectively reported by CL users; thus, updated and reliable questionnaires are needed. BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to design a new questionnaire for identifying CLD, based on the currently established CLD definition considered in the Tear Film and Ocular Surface CLD Workshop. METHODS: A survey to characterise CL wearers was created and administered. Some items of the survey were selected by a focus group and analysed using a Rasch model to develop a questionnaire to identify CLD. Unidimensionality was checked applying principal components analysis. To build a plausible CLD classification (symptomatic vs asymptomatic), an unsupervised cluster analysis was used. Gower's general similarity coefficient, the partitioning around medoids algorithm, and the silhouette width were calculated. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Cohen's kappa coefficient. A study was performed to compare this questionnaire with the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ)-8. RESULTS: The 31-item survey was completed by 1104 volunteers, and the posterior analysis resulted in a 9-item questionnaire, the Contact Lens Discomfort Index (CLDI). It showed a good fit with the model (mean square infit and outfit values range was 0.76-1.10), and good unidimensionality (eigenvalues ≤ 1.3). The CLDI score range was 0-18 and the cut-off score for identifying CLD was 8. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.94), and kappa was 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.93). Comparison of the CLDI with the CLDEQ-8 in a sample of 58 CL wearers showed that 70.7% were classified equally by both questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The CLDI is a well-structured instrument, with acceptable psychometric properties, making it a valid and reliable tool to measure CL-related symptoms.

Usefulness of a global rating change scale for contact lens discomfort evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usefulness of a global rate of change scale (GRCS) to detect variations in contact lens discomfort (CLD). METHODS: Symptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers were recruited according to the 'Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8' (CLDEQ-8). At the baseline visit, subjects scored their comfort following insertion of their habitual CL using a 0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS). After 4-10 h of CL wear, comfort was again self-evaluated with the VAS and with a GRCS (range, -50 to +50). Then, a daily disposable CL (DDCL) was fitted. After one month of DDCL wear, a follow-up visit was conducted where the same evaluations as the baseline visit were performed. Changes in comfort were estimated using a Student's t-test for normal variables and the Friedman test for multiple comparisons of non-parametric variables. Internal responsiveness was measured by calculating the standardised response mean. Agreement between scales was estimated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Twenty-nine (22 females and 7 males) CL wearers with a mean age of 23.4 ± 5.4 years participated in the study. There was a significant decrease in comfort at both visits detected by the GRCS (baseline = -13.58 ± 17.48, p < 0.001; follow up = -6.86 ± 12.69, p = 0.007). However, the VAS did not detect that change, either at baseline (insertion = 64.28 ± 18.72 vs removal = 52.89 ± 17.64, p = 1.000) or follow-up visit (insertion = 81.97 ± 12.91 vs removal = 76.48 ± 16.02, p = 1.000). Comfort at insertion and removal times was significantly higher with the DDCL (p = 0.008 at insertion and p = 0.004 at removal). The standardised response mean was greater with the GRCS than the VAS at baseline (0.78 vs 0.63) and follow-up (0.54 vs 0.37) visits. Agreement between both scales was moderate and significant (p < 0.001) for both visits, ICC: 0.674 (95 % confidence interval (CI):0.411-0.833) (baseline) and 0.652 (95 % CI:0.377-0.821) (follow-up visit). CONCLUSIONS: The GRCS can detect slight changes in CL wear comfort and shows higher responsiveness than the VAS. This subjective scale can allow detection of changes in comfort in a simple and quick way.

Does placebo effect exist in contact lens discomfort management?

PURPOSE: To study the effect of daily disposable contact lens (DDCL) refitting in monthly contact lens (CL) wearers suffering from contact lens discomfort (CLD), and to assess if there is a placebo effect associated with this CLD intervention. METHODS: Symptomatic CL wearers, according to the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire 8 (CLDEQ-8 ≥ 12 points), were divided into two groups. The study group was provided with DDCLs (delefilcon A) and the control group with a masked pair of their habitual monthly CLs (placebo effect) and were assessed after one month. Then, the control group was provided with the same DDCLs and evaluated one month later. The symptoms were recorded with the CLDEQ-8 and global rating of change scale (GRCS). Non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), conjunctival hyperaemia, fluorescein staining, and lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) were evaluated. Changes between visits, groups, and the effect of each intervention were analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-one participants (mean age: 23.2 ± 5.3 years) were recruited. The study group (n = 14) showed an improvement of -39.6 ± 25.8 % (p < 0.001) in CLDEQ-8 and 31.3 ± 14.6 points in GRCS (p < 0.001) after one month of DDCL use, while no changes in clinical tests were found. In the control group (n = 17), symptoms improved significantly after wearing the masked monthly CL (CLDEQ-8: -26.1 ± 31.0 %, p = 0.03; GRCS: 14.9 ± 17.0, p = 0.002), however a worsening in bulbar (26.5 ± 40.0 %; p = 0.02) and limbal hyperaemia (21.6 ± 34.7 %, p = 0.02) and an improvement of -19.1 ± 37.0 % (p = 0.049) in LWE was found. When the control group was fitted with the DDCL, improvements in GRCS (20.5 ± 25.5, p = 0.02), NITBUT (37.9 ± 42.3 %, p = 0.002), and conjunctival staining (-47.1 ± 59.9 %, p = 0.005) were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Refitting symptomatic monthly CL wearers with Delefilcon A DDCL is effective in reducing symptoms related to CLD. However, clinicians and researchers must be aware of the existence of a placebo effect when assessing the effectiveness of any CL refitting.

Substance P Level in Tears as a Potential Biomarker for Contact Lens Discomfort.

Purpose: To analyze the effects of contact lens (CL) wear, time of the day, and CL discomfort (CLD) on clinical signs, tear inflammatory mediators and substance P.Methods: Thirty symptomatic and 30 asymptomatic CL wearers attended two visits (morning and afternoon) on two days (non-CL and CL wearing days). Comfort, meniscus area, noninvasive breakup time (NIBUT), tear collection, hyperemia, lid parallel conjunctival folds, fluorescein staining, and sensitivity were performed. The tear levels of 23 inflammatory mediators and substance P were measured.Results: Comfort, meniscus area, NIBUT, and MMP-9 were lower while conjunctival staining and EGF higher (p ≤ 0.015) on the CL wearing day. Comfort, IL-8/CXCL8, and VEGF were lower while EGF, IP-10/CXCL10, and MCP-1/CCL2 higher (p ≤ 0.047) in the afternoon. Comfort was lower and substance P higher (p ≤ 0.006) in symptomatic wearers.Conclusion: Substance P may be implicated in CLD etiology; its role and potential application as a biomarker should be further studied.

Conjunctival Neuropathic and Inflammatory Pain-Related Gene Expression with Contact Lens Wear and Discomfort.

Purpose: To identify alterations in neuropathic and inflammatory pain gene expression associated with contact lens (CL) wear and CL discomfort (CLD).Methods: Eight non-wearers, eight asymptomatic CL wearers (CLWs) and eight symptomatic CLWs were included. Conjunctival cells were collected by impression cytology and the mRNA expression levels of 85 genes were analyzed. Differentially expressed genes between non-wearers and CLWs and between asymptomatic and symptomatic CLWs were analyzed. An enrichment analysis was also performed.Results: Twelve genes were upregulated (including IL10, PDYN and PENK) and 28 downregulated (CCL2, IL1A, IL1B, IL2 and NGF) in CLWs (p ≤ 0.050). Eleven genes were upregulated (CCL2, IL1A, IL1B, IL2 and NGF) and nine downregulated (PDYN and PENK) in symptomatic CLWs (p ≤ 0.035). Enriched overrepresented terms were related to pain, neuronal transmission and inflammation.Conclusion: Contact lens wear might produce a desensitization-like mechanism responsible for comfortable CL wear. A malfunction of this mechanism might contribute to CLD.

Contact Lens Discomfort Management: Outcomes of Common Interventions.

PURPOSE: To assess the consecutive implementation of habitual contact lens discomfort (CLD) management strategies: lid hygiene, daily disposable CL (DDCL) fitting, and artificial tear (AT) supplementation. METHODS: Contact lens (CL) wearers with CLD symptoms (CLDEQ-8 ≥12 points) were included in the study. Subjects with Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) were instructed to perform lid hygiene. All participants were fitted with a DDCL (delefilcon A) and evaluated 1 month later. After, half of them were randomly assigned to use AT (Povidone-2%) at least three times/day, and all participants were evaluated 1 month later. Tests performed were: lower tear meniscus area (LTMA), bulbar, limbal, and tarsal hyperemia, noninvasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), and corneal and conjunctival staining. Weighted combined clinical scores (CS) were created to analyze signs. Changes in symptoms (CLDEQ-8) and CS were analyzed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Forty-two subjects (mean age: 23.2±4.9 years) completed the study. Two CS were created, CS 1 was composed of bulbar, limbal, and tarsal hyperemia and corneal staining, and CS 2 by NITBUT, LTMA, and conjunctival staining. CLDEQ-8 was reduced after lid hygiene (mean: -2.73±2.13; P=0.012) and DDCL use (mean: -10.1±3.54; P<0.01), but not after AT use (P=0.62). CS 1 did not change after any intervention. CS-2 was higher (P=0.04) in DGM subjects after lid hygiene, it decreased (P=0.04) after DDCL use. CONCLUSIONS: Lid hygiene is effective for reducing CLD symptoms in MGD patients. Refitting subjects with delefilcon A is an effective intervention for CLD to reduce symptoms and achieve a healthier ocular surface. Simultaneous administration of AT did not further improve CLD.

The ability of the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ)-8 to detect ocular surface alterations in contact lens wearers.

PURPOSE: To study whether some ocular surface alterations could be associated with contact lens (CL) wearers suffering from CL discomfort (CLD) detected using the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ)-8. METHODS: Forty-one soft CL wearers further classified into symptomatic CL wearers (SCLW) and asymptomatic CL wearers (ACLW) by the CLDEQ-8, and 20 non CL wearers (NCLW) were included. Tear osmolarity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy findings, tear film break-up time, corneal and conjunctival staining, and Schirmer test were performed 24 h after CL removal. Data were compared among groups using the analysis of variance and the Student t-test or the Kruskal-Wallis H and the Mann-Whitney U tests, applying the Bonferroni correction. Correlations between the CLDEQ-8 and the clinical signs were performed using the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Twenty-four SCLW, 17 ACLW and 20 NCLW were recruited. There were significant differences among groups for tear osmolarity (p < 0.001), limbal hyperaemia (p = 0.014), and tarsal hyperaemia (p = 0.031). Pairwise comparisons revealed that SCLW and ACLW had higher tear osmolarity (p < 0.003, both comparisons) and limbal hyperaemia (p = 0.027 and p = 0.048, respectively) than NCLW. Moreover, SCLW had higher tarsal hyperaemia (p = 0.030) than NCLW. No significant correlations were found (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The CLDEQ-8 was ineffective to detect clinical alterations between SCLW and ACLW; therefore, the use of questionnaires alone remains being the best approach to detect CLD. The role of the tarsal conjunctiva in the development of CLD should be analyzed in future studies.

Are Contact Lens Discomfort or Soft Contact Lens Material Properties Associated with Alterations in the Corneal Sub-Basal Nerve Plexus?

PURPOSE: To study whether contact lens (CL) discomfort and some properties of soft CL materials are associated with alterations in the nerve fibers morphology and density of dendritic cells of the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty soft CL wearers and 20 non-CL wearers were included. The Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-short form was administered to divide CL wearers based on their symptoms (20 symptomatic and 20 asymptomatic CL wearers were included). The CL material properties considered were the CL material type (16 hydrogel and 24 silicone hydrogel CL wearers were included), water content, oxygen transmissibility, and modulus of elasticity. Confocal microscopy was performed, and the number and density of corneal nerves, density of nerve branches, grade of nerve tortuosity, and density of dendritic cells were analyzed. The effects of CL discomfort and CL material properties on the confocal microscopy parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: No significant differences were found among symptomatic and asymptomatic CL wearers and non-CL wearers in any of the confocal microscopy parameters evaluated. The density of dendritic cells was higher in the hydrogel CL wearers compared to the silicone hydrogel CL wearers and non-CL wearers (p = 0.002). The density of dendritic cells tended to be higher as the oxygen transmissibility decreased (ß = -0.40, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: CL discomfort appears not to be associated with alterations in the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus. Hydrogel CL wear might be involved in the recruitment of dendritic cells into the cornea, being a possible origin its lower oxygen permeability compared to silicone hydrogel materials. Future studies are required to confirm these results.