Evaluation of the implementation of single points of access for unattached patients in primary care and their effects: a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Attachment to a primary care provider is an important component of primary care as it facilitates access. In Québec, Canada, attachment to a family physician is a concern. To address unattached patients' barriers to accessing primary care, the Ministry of Health and Social Services mandated Québec's 18 administrative regions to implement single points of access for unattached patients (Guichets d'accès première ligne (GAPs)) that aim to better orient patients towards the most appropriate services to meet their needs. The objectives of this study are to (1) analyse the implementation of GAPs, (2) measure the effects of GAPs on performance indicators and (3) assess unattached patients' experiences of navigation, access and service utilisation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A longitudinal mixed-methods case study design will be conducted. Objective 1. Implementation will be analysed through semistructured interviews with key stakeholders, observations of key meetings and document analysis. Objective 2. GAP effects on indicators will be measured using performance dashboards produced using clinical and administrative data. Objective 3. Unattached patients' experiences will be assessed using a self-administered electronic questionnaire. Findings for each case will be interpreted and presented using a joint display, a visual tool for integrating qualitative and quantitative data. Intercase analyses will be conducted highlighting the similarities and differences across cases. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (# 475314) and the Fonds de Soutien à l'innovation en santé et en services sociaux (# 5-2-01) and was approved by the CISSS de la Montérégie-Centre Ethics Committee (MP-04-2023-716).

Patient advisors for victims of traumatic amputation: a critical intervention / Le patient-ressource chez les victimes d'amputation traumatique

Patient advisors for victims of traumatic amputation: a critical intervention. Since 2014, the Centre of Expertise in Reimplantation and Microsurgical Revascularization at the University of Montreal (CEVARMU) has been recruiting on an ad hoc basis former patients, who have completed the rehabilitation process, to accompany and support new patients at the Centre during their care process. Considered full-fledged partners of the care team, these patient advisors are invited to meet with patients who are hospitalized or in the rehabilitation process to not only share their experience but also ensure that the treatment plans proposed to the patients are well understood and meet their needs. Around forty interventions have been conducted by five patient advisors, helping to strengthen the credibility of professional interventions, break down patients' isolation, and give new meaning to the work of health professionals.

Le patient-ressource chez les victimes d'amputation traumatique. Depuis 2014, le Centre d'expertise en réimplantation ou revascularisation microchirurgicale d'urgence (CEVARMU) fait appel, sur une base ponctuelle, à d'anciens patients ayant terminé leur processus de réadaptation afin d'accompagner et de soutenir les patients nouvellement arrivés au centre dans leur propre processus de soins. Considérés comme des partenaires à part entière de l'équipe, ces patients-ressources sont invités à venir rencontrer, sur une base bénévole, les patients hospitalisés ou qui sont en processus de réadaptation afin de témoigner de leur expérience mais aussi de s'assurer que les plans de traitement proposés aux patients soient bien compris par ces derniers et qu'ils répondent à leurs besoins. Une quarantaine d'interventions ont été réalisées par cinq patientsressources et ont permis de renforcer la crédibilité des interventions des professionnels, de briser l'isolement des patients et de redonner du sens au travail des professionnels.

Bilateral thumb's active range of motion and strength in de Quervain's disease: comparison with a normal sample.

The aims of the present study were to characterize the thumb active range of motion (AROM) and strength impairments resulting from unilateral de Quervain's disease; to verify the adequacy of standard clinical assessment tools to quantify impairments resulting from this pathology; and to validate the utilization of the asymptomatic thumb as a reference to quantify the symptomatic thumb's deficits by comparing the performances of asymptomatic to control thumbs. The thumb's AROM and strength were evaluated bilaterally in 31 participants with unilateral de Quervain's disease and 18 control participants using clinical assessments involving the flexors and adductors of the thumb and experimental assessment devices measuring strength and mobility in several directions of the thumb's movements. A comparison was made between the results obtained from the symptomatic, asymptomatic, and control thumbs. The AROM performance of symptomatic thumbs was found to be reduced when compared to the asymptomatic and control thumbs for maximal thumb flexion (p=0.008 and 0.003, respectively) and total circumduction displacement (p<0.001). The strength performance of the symptomatic thumb was also found to be reduced when compared to the asymptomatic and control thumbs for palmar pinch strength (p<0.001 and 0.002, respectively) and for maximal voluntary effort in all directions (p<0.001). Differences in performance were also found between the asymptomatic and control thumbs, reaching the significance level for some movement parameters of the thumb circumduction evaluations and when palmar pinch strength results are normalized (p<0.001 and 0.009, respectively). This study revealed bilateral impairments of thumb AROM and strength for participants with de Quervain's disease, the impairments being more pronounced on the symptomatic side. This finding may question the validity of using the asymptomatic thumb as a standard measure to identify the symptomatic thumb's impairments associated with de Quervain's disease. The study also demonstrated the validity of using clinical evaluations when assessing impairments associated with this disease.

Reliability and validity of pinch and thumb strength measurements in de Quervain's disease.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the test-retest reliability and construct validity of pinch and thumb strength measurements in subjects with de Quervain's disease. Maximal palmar pinch and thumb strength (adduction, extension, abduction, and flexion) were measured using, respectively, a pinch gauge and a biaxial dynamometer. The reliability was estimated using the generalizability theory. The validity hypotheses were as follows: 1) the pinch and thumb strength of the symptomatic side would be significantly lower than that of the asymptomatic side, and 2) the strength loss would be greater for thumb extension and abduction. The reliability was high for all strength measurements, pinch strength being the more reliable one. The pinch and thumb strength in all directions evaluated was significantly decreased on the symptomatic side (p<0.003); no direction showed a greater decrease than the others. The results suggest that pinch and thumb strength measurements are reliable and able to show a decreased strength on the symptomatic side in this population.