Comparing technical success and clinical outcomes of macrocatheter versus microcatheter in genicular artery embolization for knee osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of using macrocatheters versus microcatheters for genicular artery embolization (GAE) in the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The primary outcomes were technical success and adverse events during and immediately after the procedure. The secondary outcome was the clinical outcome over the follow-up period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our retrospective analysis, we included 79 patients undergoing GAE for OA. Patients were categorized based on the catheter type used: microcatheter through macrocatheter or directly through macrocatheter. Key parameters, including technical success, adverse events, procedure duration, radiation exposure, and clinical outcomes (VAS and WOMAC scores), were assessed at 1st, 3rd, and 6th-month intervals. RESULTS: Technical success stood at 100 % for the microcatheter group, with a slight reduction for the macrocatheter group at 91 % (p = 0.069). Procedure and fluoroscopy durations were significantly shorter in the macrocatheter group (p < 0.001). Additionally, the macrocatheter group demonstrated a marked reduction in radiation dose, with notably decreased air kerma values. Clinical outcomes, including VAS and WOMAC scores at the predefined intervals, revealed no significant disparities between the two cohorts. CONCLUSION: In GAE procedures utilizing a temporary embolic agent (imipenem/cilastatin), initiating the intervention with a macrocatheter can be deemed cost-effective, safe and advantageous for patients with less complex vascular anatomy, as it significantly reduces procedural and fluoroscopy times, thereby minimizing radiation exposure. Conversely, in patients with intricate vascular pathways, transitioning to a microcatheter enhances technical success.

Effectiveness of Genicular Artery Embolization for Reducing Synovitis as Assessed by Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of genicular artery embolization (GAE) on synovitis in knee osteoarthritis (OA) using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and to assess its predictive role in pain response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted using contrast-enhanced MR imaging on 33 patients treated with GAE for knee OA between December 2022 and March 2023. MR assessments before the procedure and at 3-months after embolization were utilized in a semiquantitative scoring system for synovitis severity and distribution analysis. Pain and function through Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and visual analog scale scores were also assessed. RESULTS: Significant synovitis reduction was noted after GAE, particularly in parapatellar and periligamentous areas. Synovial contrast enhancement scores significantly decreased from 5.1 (SD ± 2.0) to 2.9 (SD ± 2.0) at 3 months (P < .001), with a moderate negative correlation between synovial enhancement scores and pain levels (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: GAE significantly reduced synovitis in knee OA, evidenced by contrast-enhanced MR imaging. The correlation between preprocedural synovial contrast enhancement scores and pain relief after the procedure, although promising, requires careful interpretation because of the complex factors affecting pain in knee OA.

MR cholangiopancreatography findings of biliary tract complications after liver transplantation

Background/aim: We aimed to present the magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) findings of biliary tract complications after liver transplantation. Materials and methods: Seventy-five patients who underwent MRCP in our department between July 2011 and July 2015 after liver transplantation were retrospectively evaluated. The MRCP images were reevaluated by three radiologists in consensus. Diagnostic confirmation of MRCP findings was obtained with direct cholangiographic examinations or with clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings and concordance between MRCP findings and the final diagnosis was investigated. Results: Twenty-seven of the 75 patients had normal MRCP findings and at least one type of biliary tract complication was detected on the MR images of 48 patients. These complications included anastomotic stricture, dilatation of the biliary tract, nonanastomotic stricture, biliary leakage, cholangitis, biloma, abscess due to cholangitis, biliary stone-sludge, and donor-to-recipient bile duct disproportion. Thirty of the 75 patients were followed only by clinical and laboratory findings without further imaging. Forty-five patients underwent direct cholangiographic examinations. At the end of the follow-up period, 28 of the 75 patients were considered free of biliary tract complications, and at least one bile duct complication was diagnosed in 47 patients. Conclusion: With its high sensitivity and specificity, MRCP should be the first choice of method in the diagnosis and follow-up of biliary complications after liver transplantation.