Mindful Eating and Current Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Objective Lifestyle adjustments are essential in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Mindful eating involves being more attentive to and aware of meals. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between mindful eating and glycemic control, as well as body mass index (BMI), in people with T2DM. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study included 448 participants who had been diagnosed with T2DM for at least six months. The participants were categorized into three groups based on their HbA1c levels. The Turkish adaptation of the Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ-30) was employed to assess levels of mindful eating behavior. Obesity was defined as a BMI ≥ 30. Anthropometric measurements, laboratory tests, and questionnaire responses were also collected. Results Participants with well-controlled diabetes (HbA1c ≤7%) demonstrated significantly higher scores on the MEQ-30 and its various subgroups in comparison to those with poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c >9%). The suboptimal glycemic control groups exhibited noticeable variations in mindful eating behaviors. Moreover, participants with lower BMIs displayed stronger inclinations toward mindful eating. Weak negative correlations were observed between BMI and specific MEQ-30 subgroups. Notably, subgroups such as emotional eating, eating control, eating discipline, and interference demonstrated weak negative correlations with the HbA1c levels. Conclusion  Higher levels of mindful eating were associated with lower levels of HbA1c and BMI, indicating that incorporating mindful eating practices may present promising advantages for individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, specifically in terms of glycemic control and weight management.

The effect of close and intensive therapeutic monitoring of patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes with different glycemic background.

Patients with type 2 diabetes who have HbA1c values ≥ 10% have different previous glycemic trends, including new diagnosis of diabetes. We aimed to assess the efficacy of 3 months of intensive and facilitated antihyperglycemic treatment in patients with different glycemic backgrounds. In this observational study, patients with type 2 diabetes and poor glycemic control (indicated by an HbA1c level of > = 10%) were divided into groups based on their previous HbA1c levels (group 1; newly diagnosed type 2 diabetics, group 2; patients with previously controlled but now deteriorated HbA1c levels, group 3; patients whose HbA1c was not previously in the target range but was now above 10%, and group 4; patients whose HbA1c was above 10% from the start). Patients received intensive diabetes management with close monitoring and facilitated hospital visits. For further analysis, patients who were known to have previously had good metabolic control (either did not have diabetes or had previously had an HbA1c value < =7) and patients who had prior poor metabolic control were analyzed separately. Of the 195 participants [female, n = 84 (43.1%)], the median age was 54 years (inter-quantile range [IQR] = 15, min = 29, max = 80) and the median baseline HbA1c was 11.8% (IQR = 2.6%, min = 10%, max = 18.3%). The median duration of diabetes was 10 years (IQR = 9, min = 1, max = 35) when newly diagnosed patients were excluded. The ≥ 20% reduction in HbA1c at month 3 was observed in groups 1 to 4 in 97%, 88.1%, 69.1%, and 55.4%, respectively. The percentage of patients who achieved an HbA1c level of 7% or less was 60.6%, 38.1%, 16.4%, and 6.2% in the groups, respectively. The rate of those who achieved an HbA1c of 7% or less was nearly 50% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had previously had good metabolic control, whereas successful control was achieved in only 1 in 10 patients with persistently high HbA1c levels. Patients' glycemic history played an important role in determining their HbA1c levels at 3 months, suggesting that previous glycemic management patterns may indicate future success in diabetes control.

Changes in the clinical characteristics of chronic hepatitis B patients at the initiation of treatment over a 15-year period.

Background and Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the changes in the clinical characteristics of chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) patients at the initiation of treatment over a 15-years period. Materials and Methods: The study included 659 treatment-naive CHB patients who started receiving nucleos(t)ide analogs between January 2006 and December 2020. The patients included in the study were divided into three groups of five years each, according to the start date of treatment. Results: The mean age was 46.2±14.5 years and 445 (67.5%) were male. Two hundred and five (31.1%) patients had cirrhosis. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) developed in forty-one patients (6.2%). Compared to patients in Group 1, Group 2 were younger and had lower decompensated cirrhosis, HCC and ascites, had higher Child A cirrhosis (all p<0.05). Cirrhosis and esophageal varices were higher in patients in Group 3 compared to patients in Group 2 (all p<0.05). Entecavir or tenofovir use increased from 66.5% in Group 1 to 99.2% in Group 3 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The mean age at initiation of treatment for CHB patients increased. The patients had less cirrhosis. In the last 5 years, almost all patients were treated with entecavir or tenofovir.

C-peptide concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin.

AIMS: To determine beta cell reserves of patients with type 2 diabetes who are treated with insulin by using fasting C-peptide concentrations and to investigate the clinical features related to C-peptide concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes, who were using insulin as monotherapy or in combination therapy, were divided into three groups; those with an insufficient beta cell reserve (C-peptide: <0.5 ng/mL), borderline reserve (C-peptide: 0.5-2 ng/mL) and sufficient reserve (C-peptide:> 2 ng/mL). RESULTS: In the 249 patients (mean age, 61.77 ± 9.34 years; 40.6% male), the mean duration of diabetes was 13.9 ± 8.43 years. The mean HbA1c concentrations, fasting glucose and C-peptide concentrations were 8.88 ± 1.87%, 184.29 ± 77.88 mg/dL and 1.95 ± 1.37 ng/mL, respectively. Fifty-seven percent of patients (n = 142) had a borderline beta cell reserve and 37% (n = 92) had high C-peptide concentrations. Only 6% of patients (n = 15) had an insufficient beta cell reserve. C-peptide levels were positively correlated with waist circumference (r: 0.282; p = 0.001), hip circumference (r: 0.251; p = 0.001), body mass index (r: 0.279; p = 0.001), fasting glucose concentrations (r: 0.309; p = 0.001) and triglyceride concentrations (r: 0.358; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, almost all patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin were found to have sufficient or borderline beta cell reserves and insulin resistance-related parameters were prominent in those with adequate beta cell reserve. CLINICAL TRIALS NO: NCT04005261.