Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(27): 859-863, 2020 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32644980

ABSTRACT

Recent reports suggest that routine childhood immunization coverage might have decreased during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (1,2). To assess the capacity of pediatric health care practices to provide immunization services to children during the pandemic, a survey of practices participating in the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program was conducted during May 12-20, 2020. Data were weighted to account for the sampling design; thus, all percentages reported are weighted. Among 1,933 responding practices, 1,727 (89.8%) were currently open; 1,397 (81.1%) of these reported offering immunization services to all of their patients. When asked whether the practice would likely be able to accommodate new patients to assist with provision of immunization services through August, 1,135 (59.1%) respondents answered affirmatively. These results suggest that health care providers appear to have the capacity to deliver routinely recommended childhood vaccines, allowing children to catch up on vaccines that might have been delayed as a result of COVID-19-related effects on the provision of or demand for routine well child care. Health care providers and immunization programs should educate parents on the need to return for well-child and immunization visits or refer patients to other practices, if they are unable to provide services (3).


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Immunization/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Pediatrics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adolescent , COVID-19 , Child , Child, Preschool , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Immunization Programs , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Program Evaluation , United States/epidemiology
2.
J Healthc Manag ; 60(6): 429-40, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26720987

ABSTRACT

Despite the rapid growth of retail clinics (RCs), literature is limited in terms of how these facilities offer preventive services, particularly vaccination services. The purpose of this study was to obtain an in-depth understanding of the RC business model pertaining to vaccine offerings, profitability, and decision making. From March to June 2009, we conducted 15 interviews with key individuals from three types of organizations: 12 representatives of RC corporations, 2 representatives of retail hosts (i.e., stores in which the RCs are located), and 1 representative of an industry association. We analyzed interview transcripts qualitatively. Our results indicate that consumer demand and profitability were the main drivers in offering vaccinations. RCs in this sample primarily offered vaccinations to adults and adolescents, and they were not well integrated with local public health and immunization registries. Our findings demonstrate the potential for stronger linkages with public health in these settings. The findings also may help inform future research to increase patient access to vaccination services at RCs.


Subject(s)
Commerce , Health Services Accessibility , Mass Vaccination , Models, Organizational , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Public Health , Qualitative Research
3.
Matern Child Health J ; 18(3): 648-56, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23836013

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to estimate prenatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening rates prior to and on admission to labor and delivery (L&D) and to examine factors associated with HIV screening, including hospital policies, with a comparison of HIV and hepatitis B prenatal screening practices and hospital policies. In March 2006, a survey of hospitals (n = 190) and review of paired maternal and infant medical records (n = 4,762) were conducted in 50 US states, DC, and Puerto Rico. Data from the survey and medical record review were analyzed using SAS software v9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). HIV testing before delivery occurred among 3,438 women (73.9%); African American and Hispanic women were more likely to be tested than white women [aOR 2.22, 95% CI (1.6-3.1) and aOR 1.55, 95% CI (1.1-2.2), respectively]. Among women without previous HIV testing, 138 (16.6%) were tested after admission to labor and delivery. Policies to test women with undocumented HIV status in at delivery were present in 65 (36.3%) hospitals. HIV testing after admission to L&D was more likely in hospitals with policies to test women with undocumented HIV status [aOR 5.91, 95% CI (2.0-17.8)]. Overall, policies and screening practices for HIV were consistently less prevalent than those for hepatitis B. Many women are not being routinely screened for HIV before or at delivery. Women with unknown HIV status were more likely to be tested in L&D in hospitals with testing policies.


Subject(s)
HIV Seropositivity/diagnosis , Labor, Obstetric , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Audit , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...