Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Rev. esp. cardiol. (Ed. impr.) ; 61(10): 1030-1040, oct. 2008. ilus, tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-70645

ABSTRACT

Introducción y objetivos. La insuficiencia cardiaca congestiva (ICC) tiene elevadas incidencia, morbilidad y mortalidad y una gran prevalencia. Sin embargo, no hay datos directos sobre este aspecto en nuestro país. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es evaluar la prevalencia de ICC en España. Métodos. Se diseñó un estudio poblacional en el que participaron 15 centros repartidos por toda España. Se seleccionó de forma aleatoria una muestra de la población de 45 o más años de edad atendida en cada área de salud, que fue estudiada por sus médicos de atención primaria. Se utilizaron los criterios de Framingham para el diagnóstico. Las personas con criterios de ICC fueron remitidas a una consulta de cardiología para confirmación diagnóstica y realización de ecocardiograma. Resultados. Se evaluó a 1.776 personas, con una media ± desviación estándar (intervalo) de edad de 64 ± 12 (45-100) años; eran varones el 44%. Se remitió a cardiología a 242 pacientes. La prevalencia ponderada de ICC fue del 6,8% (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 4%-8,7%). La prevalencia fue similar en varones (6,5%; IC del 95%, 4,7%-8,4%) y en mujeres (7%; IC del 95%, 4,4%-9,6%). Por edades, la prevalencia fue del 1,3% (0,4%-2,1%) entre los 45 y 54 años; el 5,5% (2,4%-8,5%) entre 55 y 64 años; el 8% (4,2%-11,8%) entre 65 y 74 años, y el 16,1% (11%-21,1%) en personas de 75 o más años. Conclusiones. La prevalencia de ICC en España es alta, en torno a un 7-8%. La prevalencia es similar en varones y mujeres, y parece aumentar con la edad (AU)


Introduction and objectives. Congestive heart failure is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality and both its incidence and prevalence are high. Nevertheless, comprehensive data on this condition in Spain are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of congestive heart failure in Spain. Methods. A demographic study which involved the participation of 15 healthcare centers throughout Spain was carried out. In each health area, a random sample was taken of the population aged 45 years or more. These individuals were examined by their primary care physicians, who made their diagnoses using Framingham criteria. Individuals who satisfied criteria for congestive heart failure were referred to a cardiologist for confirmation of the diagnosis and for echocardiography. Results. Overall, 1776 individuals were evaluated. Their mean age was 64±12 years (range, 45-100 years) and 44% were male. Of these, 242 were referred to a cardiologist. The weighted prevalence of congestive heart failure was 6.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4-8.7). The prevalence was similar in men (6.5%, 95% CI 4.7-8.4) and women (7%, 95% CI 4.4-9.6). When analyzed by age, the prevalence was 1.3% (0.4%-2.1%) in those aged 45-54 years, 5.5% (2.4%-8.5%) in those aged 55-64 years, 8% (4.2%-11.8%) in those aged 65-74 years, and 16.1% (11%-21.1%) in those aged over 74 years. Conclusions. Prevalence of congestive heart failure in Spain is high, at about 7%-8%. The prevalence was similar in males and females, and appeared to increase with age (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Risk Adjustment/methods , Hypercholesterolemia/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology
2.
Rev Esp Cardiol ; 61(10): 1030-40, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18817679

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and geographic distribution of major cardiovascular risk factors in the Spanish population. To investigate whether geographic variability exists. METHODS: Data were pooled from eight cross-sectional epidemiologic studies carried out in Spain between 1992 and 2001 whose methodological quality satisfied predefined criteria. Individual data were reassessed and analyzed by age group (20-44 years, 45-64 years, and 365 years), sex and geographic area. The study population included 19,729 individuals. Mean values and unadjusted and adjusted prevalence rates were derived for various risk factors. RESULTS: The most common cardiovascular risk factors in the Spanish population were, in descending order: hypercholesterolemia (i.e., total cholesterol >200 mg/dL) in 46.7%, hypertension in 37.6%, smoking in 32.2%, obesity in 22.8%, and diabetes mellitus in 6.2%. The mean values for blood pressure, body mass index, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and glycemia varied considerably with age, sex and geographic area. The highest levels of cardiovascular risk factors were observed in Mediterranean and south-eastern areas of the country and the lowest, in northern and central areas. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of major cardiovascular risk factors in Spain was high. Their distribution varied considerably with geographic area.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
3.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 17(1): 41-9, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17174225

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is being used increasingly to diagnose peripheral arterial disease (PAD) that predicts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of PAD and associated risk factors in a Spanish random population sample of age > or =40. METHODS AND RESULTS: PAD is defined as an ABI<0.9 in either leg. 784 participants of age > or =40 were randomly selected in a Spanish province. 55.4% of them were female. The prevalence of PAD in this sample was 10.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.4-12.8); 9.7% in females and 11.4% in males. In logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age and gender, smoking per 10 pack-years (odds ratio (OR) 1.40, 95% CI 1.23-1.58), hypertension (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.05-3.28), hypercholesterolemia (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.04-2.98), and diabetes (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.04-3.11) were positively associated with prevalent PAD. More than 91% of persons with PAD had one or more cardiovascular disease risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in our study hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus and smoking are associated with PAD. The majority of individuals with PAD had at least one important cardiovascular risk factor advanced enough to be considered eligible for an aggressive treatment.


Subject(s)
Ankle/blood supply , Blood Pressure/physiology , Brachial Artery/physiopathology , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/etiology , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/physiopathology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Characteristics
4.
Blood Press Monit ; 9(4): 211-8, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15311148

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To establish reference values for blood pressure by means of self-measurement of blood pressure (BP) conducted at home. DESIGN: Descriptive study of the distribution of self-measured BP at home and its correspondence with clinic-based measurements of BP. METHODS: The aim of this study is to define the home BP levels that correspond to clinic BP thresholds 140/90 mmHg (hypertension) and 130/85 mmHg (normality). The sample consisting of 1411 randomly selected adults stratified by age and gender. A pre-calibrated electronic device (Omron 705CP) was used for BP and heart rate (HR) measurements and a trained nurse performed clinic-based sphygmomanometer measurements. The same nurse provided tutorials for the subjects on how to obtain 12 self-measured BP values at home using the Omron device in a single day. RESULTS: Of the 1184 volunteers that attended the appointment, 195 were known as hypertensives and were excluded from the study. The average age of the remaining 989 subjects (50.4% females) was 44.3 years. Clinic BP values were significantly higher than self-measured BP at home regardless of age and gender. Both had good correlations (systolic BP, r=0.84 and diastolic BP, r=0.77). Using linear regression, the self-measured BP at home hypertension threshold would be 131/82 mmHg and the limit of normality 123/78 mmHg. Using corresponding percentiles, these values would be 134/85 and 124/80 mmHg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The self-measured BP at home values found in this study, when defining hypertension, are lower than values currently accepted (135/85 mmHg). Long-term studies are necessary to confirm these results.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/physiology , Heart Rate/physiology , Self Care , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diastole , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Sphygmomanometers , Systole
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...