Identification of high-risk amino-acid substitutions in hematopoietic cell transplantation: a challenging task.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers the potential to cure hematologic malignancies. In the absence of an HLA-matched donor, HLA mismatched unrelated donors may be used, although risks of GvHD and treatment-related mortality (TRM) are higher. Identification and avoidance of amino-acid substitution and position types (AASPT) conferring higher risks of TRM and GvHD would potentially improve the success of transplantation from single HLA mismatched unrelated donors. Using random forest and logistic regression analyses, we identified 19 AASPT associated with greater risks for at least one adverse transplant outcome: grade III-IV acute GvHD, TRM, lower disease-free survival or worse overall survival relative to HLA-matched unrelated donors and to other AASPT. When tested in an independent validation cohort of 3530 patients, none of the AASPT from the training set were validated as high risk, however. Review of the literature shows that failure to validate original observations is the rule and not the exception in immunobiology and emphasizes the importance of independent validation before clinical application. Our current data do not support avoiding any specific class I AASPT for unrelated donors. Additional studies should be performed to fully understand the role of AASPT in HCT outcomes.

Quantitative characterization of T-cell repertoire in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is one of curative treatment options for patients with hematologic malignancies. Although GVHD mediated by the donor's T lymphocytes remains the most challenging toxicity of allo-HSCT, graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect targeting leukemic cells, has an important role in affecting the overall outcome of patients with AML. Here we comprehensively characterized the TCR repertoire in patients who underwent matched donor or haplo-cord HSCT using next-generation sequencing approach. Our study defines the functional kinetics of each TCRA and TCRB clone, and changes in T-cell diversity (with identification of CDR3 sequences) and the extent of clonal expansion of certain T-cells. Using this approach, our study demonstrates that higher percentage of cord-blood cells at 30 days after transplant was correlated with higher diversity of TCR repertoire, implicating the role of cord-chimerism in enhancing immune recovery. Importantly, we found that GVHD and relapse, exclusive of each other, were correlated with lower TCR repertoire diversity and expansion of certain T-cell clones. Our results highlight novel insights into the balance between GVHD and GVL effect, suggesting that higher diversity early after transplant possibly implies lower risks of both GVHD and relapse following the HSCT transplantation.

Comparison of non-myeloablative conditioning regimens for lymphoproliferative disorders.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with non-myeloablative (NMA) conditioning for lymphoproliferative diseases (LD) includes fludarabine with and without low-dose TBI. Transplant outcomes were compared among patients aged ⩾40 years with LD who received a HCT with TBI (N=382) or no-TBI (N=515) NMA from 2001 to 2011. The groups were comparable except for donor, graft, prophylaxis for GVHD, disease status and year of HCT. Cumulative incidences of grades II-IV GVHD at 100 days were 29% and 20% (P=0.001) and of chronic GVHD at 1 year were 54% and 44% (P=0.004) for TBI and no-TBI, respectively. Multivariate analysis of progression/relapse, treatment failure and mortality showed no outcome differences by conditioning. Full donor chimerism at day 100 was observed in 82% vs 64% in the TBI and no-TBI groups, respectively (P=0.006). Subsets of the four most common conditioning/GVHD prophylaxis combinations demonstrated higher rates of grades II-IV acute (P<0.001) and chronic GVHD (P<0.001) among recipients of TBI-mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) compared with other combinations. TBI-based NMA conditioning induces faster full donor chimerism, but overall survival outcomes are comparable to no-TBI regimens. Combinations of TBI and MMF are associated with higher rates of GVHD without impact on survival outcomes in patients with LD.

Ph+ ALL patients in first complete remission have similar survival after reduced intensity and myeloablative allogeneic transplantation: impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitor and minimal residual disease.

The efficacy of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is uncertain. We analyzed 197 adults with Ph+ ALL in first complete remission; 67 patients receiving RIC were matched with 130 receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for age, donor type and HCT year. Over 75% received pre-HCT tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), mostly imatinib; 39% (RIC) and 49% (MAC) were minimal residual disease (MRD)(neg) pre-HCT. At a median 4.5 years follow-up, 1-year transplant-related mortality (TRM) was lower in RIC (13%) than MAC (36%; P=0.001) while the 3-year relapse rate was 49% in RIC and 28% in MAC (P=0.058). Overall survival (OS) was similar (RIC 39% (95% confidence interval (CI) 27-52) vs 35% (95% CI 27-44); P=0.62). Patients MRD(pos) pre-HCT had higher risk of relapse with RIC vs MAC (hazard ratio (HR) 1.97; P=0.026). However, patients receiving pre-HCT TKI in combination with MRD negativity pre-RIC HCT had superior OS (55%) compared with a similar MRD population after MAC (33%; P=0.0042). In multivariate analysis, RIC lowered TRM (HR 0.6; P=0.057), but absence of pre-HCT TKI (HR 1.88; P=0.018), RIC (HR 1.891; P=0.054) and pre-HCT MRD(pos) (HR 1.6; P=0.070) increased relapse risk. RIC is a valid alternative strategy for Ph+ ALL patients ineligible for MAC and MRD(neg) status is preferred pre-HCT.

A novel clofarabine bridge strategy facilitates allogeneic transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

Patients with relapsed/refractory leukemias or advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) fare poorly following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). We report prospective phase II study results of 29 patients given clofarabine 30 mg/m(2)/day i.v. × 5 days followed immediately by HCT conditioning while at the cytopenic nadir. A total of 15/29 patients (52%) were cytoreduced according to pre-defined criteria (cellularity <20% and blasts <10%). Marrow cellularity (P<0.0001) and blast% (P=0.03) were reduced. Toxicities were acceptable, with transient hyperbilirubinemia (48%) and gr3-4 infections (10%). In all, 28/29 proceeded to transplant; 27 received ATG or alemtuzumab. Post HCT, 180 day non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1-21), relapse was 29% (95% CI: 13-46) and OS was 71% (95% CI: 51-85), comparing favorably to published data for high-risk patients. Two-year graft vs host disease incidence was 40% (95% CI: 21-58) and 2 year OS was 31% (95% CI: 14-48). Disease at the nadir correlated with inferior OS after HCT (HR=1.22 for each 10% marrow blasts, 95% CI: 1.02-1.46). For AML/MDS patients, there was a suggestion that successful cytoreduction increased PFS (330 vs 171 days, P=0.3) and OS (375 vs 195 days, P=0.31). Clofarabine used as a bridge to HCT reduces disease burden, is well tolerated, and permits high-risk patients to undergo HCT with acceptable NRM. Late relapses are common; thus, additional strategies should be pursued. NCT-00724009.

Plerixafor and G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with NHL, Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma: results from the expanded access program.

Before US regulatory approval, an expanded access program provided plerixafor to patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HD) or multiple myeloma (MM) who had not previously failed mobilization and were otherwise candidates for auto-SCT. Patients received granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF) 10 mcg/kg daily and plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg starting on day 4 with apheresis on day 5; all repeated daily until collection was complete. Overall, 104 patients received 1 dose of plerixafor. The addition of plerixafor to G-CSF resulted in a median threefold increase in peripheral blood CD34+ cell count between days 4 and 5. Among 43 NHL patients, 74% met the target of 5 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (median, 1 day apheresis, range 1-5 days); among 7 HD patients, 57% met the target of 5 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (median, 2 days apheresis, range 1-3); and among 54 MM patients, 89% met the target of 6 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (median, 1 day apheresis, range 1-4). Overall, 93% of patients had 2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg collected within 1-3 days. Plerixafor-related toxicities were minimal. Engraftment kinetics, graft durability and transplant outcomes demonstrated no unexpected outcomes. Efficacy and safety results were similar to results in phase II and III clinical trials.

Feasibility of clofarabine cytoreduction before allogeneic transplant conditioning for refractory AML.

To control disease before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for relapsed/refractory AML, we used clofarabine cytoreduction. Seventeen patients received clofarabine 30-40 mg/m(2) i.v. daily for 5 days with plans to initiate conditioning during the nadir, 14 days later. Bone marrow biopsy 12 days after clofarabine showed effective cytoreduction (that is,<20% cellularity with <10% blasts) in 10 of 17 patients (59%). Ineffective cytoreduction correlated with lower PFS (3.8 vs 6.4 months; HR=2.7, 95% CI=1.10-14.29, P=0.035) and OS (5.1 vs 16.6 months; HR=2.5, 95% CI=0.98-12.17, P=0.053). Significant toxicities before HCT, attributable to clofarabine, were grade 1-2 hyperbilirubinemia (18%); grade 1-2 (59%) or grade 3-4 (18%) transaminitis; and grade 1-2 (18%) creatinine elevation. Sixteen patients proceeded to HCT infusion 22 days (median) after initiation of clofarabine. Day 100 and 2-year transplant-related mortality were 6 and 36%. Nine patients relapsed. One year PFS and OS were 25 and 38%, respectively. Two patients are alive in remission at 18 and 52 months. Clofarabine cytoreduction followed by immediate HCT is feasible with acceptable toxicity and TRM. Outcomes for this cohort of patients with refractory AML remain poor and we are studying this approach in a prospective manner.

Outcomes of patients with AML and MDS who relapse or progress after reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

We describe treatment, outcomes and prognostic factors for patients who relapse following transplantation with a reduced intensity conditioning regimen. Seventy consecutive patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies underwent transplant and 25 (36%) relapsed, a median of 120 days later. The median percentage of bone marrow blasts at relapse was 24, the median donor chimerism was 73% and new karyotypic abnormalities occurred in 8 out of 20 (40%) evaluable patients. Twenty-one patients (84%) received aggressive treatment for relapse, including chemotherapy (60%), second hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT; 52%) and/or donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI; 12%). Thirteen achieved a complete response (CR) and four remain in CR. Median overall survival (OS) after relapse was 6 months (95% confidence interval=2.7-9.9 months), and actuarial 1 year OS was 24%. Most deaths were due to disease progression (17/20, 85%). We did not observe an advantage for cellular therapy (DLI or second transplant) compared to chemotherapy. Salvage therapy for relapse after reduced intensity HCT is feasible, associated with low treatment-related mortality, and may result in prolonged survival in select patients. Studies exploring the optimal treatment for relapse following reduced intensity HCT are warranted.

Pre-transplant ganciclovir and post transplant high-dose valacyclovir reduce CMV infections after alemtuzumab-based conditioning.

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H)-based conditioning regimens are effective in preventing GVHD, but are associated with very high rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, a major limitation to their use. We evaluated 85 patients receiving conditioning with fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day (day -7 to day -3), alemtuzumab 20 mg/day (day -7 to day -3), and melphalan 140 mg/m2 on day -2. The initial patients received post transplant CMV prophylaxis with high-dose acyclovir. A very high incidence of CMV viremia was observed as has been commonly reported after alemtuzumab-based conditioning. Sixty-seven subsequent patients received pre-transplant ganciclovir and high-dose valacyclovir after engraftment. The cumulative incidence of CMV infection in the valacyclovir cohort was 29%. This compared favorably to the cumulative incidence of 53% in patients receiving only acyclovir (P = 0.004) and to literature data. CMV prophylaxis with pre-transplant ganciclovir and high-dose valacyclovir after engraftment appears effective in preventing the excessive incidence of CMV infection after alemtuzumab-based conditioning regimens.

Fludarabine, melphalan, and alemtuzumab conditioning in adults with standard-risk advanced acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

PURPOSE: This prospective phase II study evaluated toxicity, relapse rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival after allogeneic transplantation and conditioning with fludarabine, melphalan, and alemtuzumab in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive adults with AML and MDS were enrolled onto the study. Median age was 52 years (range, 17 to 71 years) and the majority of patients had high-risk disease, comorbidities, and/or modest reduction in performance status. Fifty-six percent of patients had unrelated or mismatched related donors. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 2 to 34 months), 1-year survival was 48% (95% CI, 34% to 61%), progression-free survival was 38% (95% CI, 25% to 52%), relapse rate was 27% (95% CI, 15% to 40%), and treatment-related mortality was 33% (95% CI, 20% to 46%). The cumulative probability of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was only 18% (95% CI, 8% to 40%); extensive chronic GVHD was only observed in recipients of unrelated donor transplants. Performance score and disease status were the major predictors of outcome. High-risk disease (ie, active AML or MDS with > 5% blasts) or even modest decreases in performance status were associated with poor outcomes. Patients with standard-risk leukemia (first or second complete remission) or MDS (< 5% blasts) had excellent outcomes despite unfavorable disease characteristics. CONCLUSION: Fludarabine and melphalan combined with in vivo alemtuzumab is a promising transplantation regimen for patients with AML or MDS and low tumor burden. For patients with active disease, this regimen provides at best modest palliation. Despite a low incidence of GVHD, transplantation is still associated with considerable nonrelapse mortality in patients with decreased performance status.

Long-term follow-up of nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation for renal cell carcinoma: The University of Chicago Experience.

Nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (NST) has considerable activity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), although there are limited long-term follow-up data. Between February 1999 and May 2003, 18 patients with metastatic RCC underwent 19 matched-sibling NSTs after conditioning with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as post-transplant immunosuppression. Among the four objective responses, all were partial and have relapsed with a median response duration of 609 days (range, 107-926). All responders are alive at a median of 41 months. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 14 months. There were four early treatment-related deaths and one late treatment-related death. Eight patients died from progressive disease and five (28%) from treatment-related mortality. Stratifying transplant outcome as early death, intermediate (no response, no early death), or response, the combination of pre-treatment anemia and decreased performance status, was associated with adverse outcome (P = 0.015) and reduced survival (HR 5.4, 95% confidence interval of 1.4 to 21, P = 0.007). Responders demonstrated prolonged survival compared to nonresponders (P = 0.002). NST leads to durable responses in a minority of metastatic RCC patients. Appropriate patient selection is paramount. Anemia and decreased performance status may enable risk stratification.

Clinical responses following nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation for renal cell carcinoma are associated with expansion of CD8+ IFN-gamma-producing T cells.

Nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (NST) is thought to be an immunologic therapy in which donor T cells mediate a graft-versus-tumor effect. We recently reported the clinical outcome of a phase II trial of NST in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the immune response correlates of clinical activity remain unknown. We now describe the analysis of T-cell subsets and T-cell cytokine-producing potential for those patients evaluable for immune monitoring. The incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) correlated with clinical outcome, with all responders exhibiting chronic GVHD. Following initial tapering of immunosuppression, an increase in the total numbers of CD8+ T cells but not CD4+ T cells was observed among responders compared to nonresponders. In addition, a greater ratio of CD8+ to CD4+ T cells producing IFN-gamma and IL-2 was seen in clinical responders at the time when clinical responses were first detected (day 180 after transplantation). Our results support the hypothesis that the antitumor effects of NST may be mediated by IFN-gamma-producing CD8+ T cells, and indicate that isolation of putative tumor antigen-specific T cells, ideally, should be pursued around day +180.