Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 12(10): 744-6, 1995 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8624434

ABSTRACT

The effects of gonadotropin stimulation on mouse embryo uptake and incorporation of 35S-methionine were studied. We found that the uptake of 35S-methionine was reduced in embryos of stimulated females in both the two-cell and the blastocyst developmental stage. The incorporation of 35S-methionine into protein was not statistically significantly different between the embryos of stimulated and those of unstimulated females. Qualitatively, protein synthesis was equal in both groups as determined with one-dimensional SDS-PAGE. The results are discussed and we conclude that mouse embryo viability in vivo is decreased by ovarian stimulation.


Subject(s)
Blastocyst/metabolism , Gonadotropins/pharmacology , Methionine/metabolism , Animals , Blastocyst/drug effects , Embryonic and Fetal Development , Female , Mice , Protein Biosynthesis
2.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 196(1): 103-8, 1991 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1678712

ABSTRACT

There is increasing evidence that classical neuroleptics (neuroleptics that induce so called extrapyramidal side effects) and atypical neuroleptic drugs (neuroleptics that do not induce these side effects) have different mechanisms of action. It has been suggested that atypical neuroleptics may work at least partially through the dopamine D1 receptor whereas classical neuroleptics are generally considered to work via the dopamine D2 receptor. In order to test this hypothesis we evaluated the role of D1 and D2 receptors in the effects of haloperidol and clozapine in the paw test. This test has been shown to be a good animal model for both the therapeutic efficacy of classical and atypical neuroleptics as well as for the extrapyramidal side effect potential of classical neuroleptics. The present results show that the effects of haloperidol in the paw test are antagonised by a dopamine D2 agonist but not by a D1 agonist, whereas the effects of clozapine are reversed by a D1 agonist but not by a D2 agonist. These data suggest that haloperidol produces its therapeutic and extrapyramidal side effects via blockade of dopamine D2 receptors, whereas clozapine produces its therapeutic effects via blockade of dopamine D1 receptors.


Subject(s)
Clozapine/pharmacology , Dopamine Antagonists , Haloperidol/pharmacology , 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine/pharmacology , Animals , Dopamine Agents/pharmacology , Drug Interactions , Ergolines/pharmacology , Male , Quinpirole , Rats , Rats, Inbred Strains , Receptors, Dopamine/classification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...