ABSTRACT
A number of techniques, including autoradiography after in vivo administration of tritiated thymidine ([3H]dT), immunohistochemistry after in vivo administration of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd), and flow cytometry (FCM) with and without BrdUrd detection were compared in the epithelium of ventral mouse tongue. Investigation of the diurnal proliferative rhythm by immunohistochemical detection of incorporated BrdUrd with different primary antibodies in combination with the alkaline-phosphatase anti-alkaline-phosphatase technique, the peroxidase-anti-peroxidase method, and an indirect method with a polyclonal peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody yielded results similar to standard autoradiography. Preparation of single cell suspensions for flow cytometry was not successful. A maximum yield of about 8.5% of the original cell number was achieved by ultrasound disintegration in combination with trypsin and dithioerythrol treatment, but neither a G0/G1 peak nor a G2 + M peak was observed in DNA histograms. A better yield of about 38% of the original nuclei number was obtained by preparation of suspensions of nuclei using citric acid and the detergent Tween 20 in combination with magnetic stirring. Both S-phase index and BrdUrd labelling index could be determined by FCM and showed the normal diurnal variations. However, the BrdUrd labelling index in suspensions of nuclei was significantly higher than the labelling index determined after immunohistochemistry. The FCM S-phase index at times of day with low DNA synthesizing activity was higher than the BrdUrd index, indicating a fraction of unlabelled S-phase cells. In conclusion, detection of incorporated BrdUrd in oral mucosa by immunohistochemical techniques or flow cytometry is feasible and provides a useful tool for fast measurements of proliferation.
