Trends and Factors Associated With the Mortality Rate of Depressive Episodes: An Analysis of the CDC Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiological Research (WONDER) Database.

Background Depressive episodes are associated with increased mortality rates across the United States. Recognizing the relationship between depression and physical health, understanding the contributing factors, and addressing disparities are critical in reducing mortality rates and improving the overall well-being of individuals experiencing depressive episodes. Continued research, public health efforts, and collaborative approaches are essential to tackle this complex public health concern effectively. Studying the mortality rate trends of depressive episodes along with other related factors will help enhance the understanding of the condition, which, in turn, will assist in reducing mortality rates in the vulnerable population. Methodology Data from the CDC Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) database on the Underlying Cause of Death were examined to identify individuals who experienced fatal outcomes related to depressive episodes from 1999 to 2020. The WONDER database refers to the online system used by the CDC to make its various resources accessible to the public and public health experts. CDC WONDER offers access to a broader range of information on public health. Results A total of 13,290 individuals who died from depressive episodes between 1999 and 2020 were identified. Data analysis revealed an overall mortality rate of 0.20 per 100,000 individuals during the specified period. The highest mortality rates were observed in the years 2003 (0.28), 2001 (0.27), and 1999 (0.27). The analysis revealed significant disparities in mortality rates among different demographic groups. Older adults, females, specific racial groups, including Whites and African Americans, and specific geographic areas, including the Midwest, Northeast, South, and West, exhibited higher mortality rates associated with depressive episodes. Conclusions The study identified that older individuals, females, Whites, and African Americans, as well as certain geographic regions, exhibited an increased likelihood of mortality related to depressive episodes. These findings highlight the importance of understanding the complex interplay between mental health and mortality. The findings emphasize the importance of addressing disparities in mental health outcomes among different demographic groups. Identifying vulnerable populations can inform targeted interventions and resources to address the elevated mortality risk.

Exploring the Prevalence and Factors Influencing Clinical Trial Awareness in US Adults with Self-Reported Depression and Anxiety.

OBJECTIVE: Lack of clinical trial awareness is a crucial barrier to clinical trial enrollment. The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence and factors associated with clinical trial awareness among US adults with self-reported depression and anxiety. METHODS: Data were collected from 896 adults who self-reported depression and anxiety from the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey. Multinomial logistic regression was utilized to assess predictors of clinical trial awareness, particularly socio-demographic, health-related, and technological variables. Odds ratios (OR) for the associations were reported. RESULTS: About 60.4% of adults with self-reported depression or anxiety reported being aware of clinical trials. In the multivariable regression, education level, health-related social media use, and having access to a regular provider were all significantly associated with greater odds of clinical trial awareness among individuals with depression and/or anxiety. Specifically, individuals with at least some college education (OR 2.07, 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.28-3.34; p ​= ​0.004) were more likely to report awareness of clinical trials than those with less than a college education. Similarly, compared to those without access to health providers, individuals with depression and/or anxiety who had a regular provider had greater odds of clinical trial awareness (OR 2.23, 95% CI; 1.16-4.31; p ​= ​0.017). Additionally, those who reported two or more health-related uses of social media were significantly more likely to report clinical trial awareness than their counterparts who reported no health-related social media use (OR 3.17, 95% CI; 1.48-6.80; p ​= ​0.004). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that about six in 10 adults with depression and anxiety in the United States were aware of clinical trials. However, some sub-groups of patients, particularly those without access to a regular health provider, those with a lower education level, and those with limited use of social media for health purposes, remain inadequately informed and may lack awareness of available clinical trials. These findings are crucial and identify subgroups of people with mental disorders that may benefit from targeted interventions to improve clinical trial awareness.