Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35234902

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Transapical Neochordae implantation (NC) allows beating heart mitral valve repair in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation. The aim of this single-centre, retrospective study was to compare outcomes of NC versus conventional surgical (CS) mitral valve repair. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent isolated mitral valve repair with NC or CS from January 2010 to December 2018 were collected. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce confounding due to baseline differences between groups. The primary end point was overall all-cause mortality; secondary end points were freedom from reoperation, freedom from moderate (2+) and from severe (3+) mitral regurgitation (MR) and New York Heart Association functional class in the overall population and in patients with isolated P2 prolapse (type A anatomy). RESULTS: Propensity analysis selected 88 matched pairs. There was no 30-day mortality in the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar 5-year survival in the 2 groups. Patients undergoing NC showed worse freedom from moderate MR (≥2+) (57.6% vs 84.6%; P < 0.001) and from severe MR (3+) at 5-year follow-up: 78.1% vs 89.7% (P = 0.032). In patients with type A anatomy, freedom from moderate MR and from severe MR was similar between groups (moderate: 63.9% vs 74.6%; P = 0.21; severe: 79.3% vs 79%; P = 0.77 in NC and FS, respectively). Freedom from reoperation was lower in the NC group: 78.9% vs 92% (P = 0.022) but, in type A patients, it was similar: 79.7% and 85% (P = 0.75) in the NC and CS group, respectively. More than 90% of patients of both groups were in New York Heart Association class I and II at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Transapical beating-heart mitral chordae implantation can be considered as an alternative treatment to CS, especially in patients with isolated P2 prolapse.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Mitral Valve Prolapse , Chordae Tendineae/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Humans , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/adverse effects , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Mitral Valve Prolapse/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Prolapse/surgery , Prolapse , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Minerva Cardioangiol ; 60(1): 57-70, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22322574

ABSTRACT

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvulopathy worldwide increasing in prevalence. Cardiac surgical intervention, preferable repair, is the standard of care, but a relevant number of patients with severe MR do not undergo surgery because of high peri-operative risk. Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip System has evolved as a new tool for the treatment of severe MR. The procedure simulates the surgical edge-to-edge technique, developed by Alfieri in 1991, creating a double orifice valve by a permanent approximation of the two mitral valve leaflets. Several preclinical studies, registries and Food and Drug Administration approved clinical trials (EVEREST, ACCESS-EU) are currently available. The percutaneous approach has been recently studied in a randomized controlled trial, concluding that the device is less effective at reducing MR, when compared with surgery, by associated with a lower adverse event rate. The patients enrolled in this trial had a normal surgical risk and mainly degenerative MR with preserved left ventricular function. On the other hand, results derived from the clinical "real life" experience, show that patients actually treated in Europe present a higher surgical risk profile, more complex mitral valve anatomy and functional MR in the most of cases. Thus these data suggest that MitraClip procedure is feasible and safe in this subgroup of patients that should be excluded from the EVEREST trial due to rigid exclusion criteria. Despite the promising results clinical experience is still small, and no data related the durability are currently available. Therefore, MitraClip device should be reserved now to high risk or inoperable patients.


Subject(s)
Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Clinical Trials as Topic , Equipment Design , Forecasting , Humans
3.
Minerva Cardioangiol ; 58(5): 589-98, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20948505

ABSTRACT

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the second most common heart valve disease worldwide and the current gold-standard treatment is surgical repair or replacement. Nevertheless, many patients do not undergo surgical intervention due to several comorbidities. Percutaneous "edge-to-edge" mitral valve repair using the MitraClip System is an emerging and effective option to this subset of patients. This device has been used to treat both functional and degenerative mitral valve regurgitation and has been compared to surgery in the Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study II (EVEREST II) randomized trial. Although the field of percutaneous management of MR is at an early stage, it has been demonstrated that percutaneous approaches can reduce MR, suggesting there is a great deal of potential for clinical benefit to patients with MR.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Surgical Instruments , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Humans , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Surgical Instruments/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...