The Impact of Stress and Depression on the Outcome of Human Gestation.

Many researchers have reported on the high prevalence of anxiety and depression during pregnancy as well as the influence on delivery outcomes during the past decade. Preterm birth and premature labor, bleeding, higher frequency of cesarean section (CS), low birth weight, preeclampsia, stillbirth, miscarriage, NICU hospitalization, and a low Apgar score are the most commonly referenced outcomes assessed. Clarifying the relationship between exposure and result may help us to understand the risk factors and guide us to future clinical and research practices. The purpose of this narrative review is to search the following databases: PubMed, Research Gate, Scopus, Medline Plus, and present the most recent, comprehensive literature on the effects of stress and anxiety on pregnancy outcomes. Articles published from 01/01/2000 to 26/11/2022 were obtained from the previous databases. Anxiety and depression-related disorders are common nowadays, and they are frequently correlated with poor pregnancy outcomes. These problems are caused by a number of factors, including health social determinants, the individual obstetric situation, access to healthcare facilities, etc. The effects of each of these factors on birth outcomes range from major, such as preterm labor, congenital deformities, and low birth weight, to minor, such as mutations in the fetal epigenome. Both direct and indirect pathways of substantial interactions between depression, anxiety and stress, risk variables, and delivery problems were identified. Women's health practitioners and mental physicians must provide adequate support to these women in order to improve outcomes for both mothers and infants.

Is Conception by Means In Vitro Fertilization Associated With Increased Risk of Antenatal Anxiety and Depression?

Objectives Mental health during pregnancy is a very important public health issue with negative effects on both maternal and child outcomes. The aim of our study is to examine the possible association between conception via in vitro fertilization (IVF) and anxiety or depression during the third pregnancy trimester in the Greek population during the years of financial crisis. Materials and Methods This single-center prospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary university hospital during the period 2017-2018. Pregnant women attending the Antenatal Care Program between 30th-32nd gestational week were asked to complete Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). A propensity score match for 10 variables was conducted in a 1:3 ratio. Results Of the 521 eligible patients, 446 women were included in our study. Four hundred fourteen of them conceived spontaneously, and 32 via IVF. After propensity score matching, 76 remained in the analysis, of whom 57 conceived spontaneously and 19 with IVF. The IVF group had a higher rate of anxiety (18.8%) and a lower rate of depression (9.4%) than the spontaneous conception group (13.5% and 13.5%, respectively), but the differences were not statistically significant before and after propensity score matching.  Conclusion Our study showed that pregnancies after IVF had a higher incidence of antenatal anxiety and a lower incidence of antenatal depression in comparison to pregnancies that were conceived naturally, although the differences did not reach statistical significance.

Level of knowledge about genital chlamydial infection among Greek midwives and midwifery students.

We aimed to evaluate the knowledge about chlamydial infection of Greek midwives and midwifery students. An appropriately designed, self-administered, anonymous questionnaire was distributed to 107 midwives and 29 graduating midwifery students. Perceived awareness of chlamydial infection was similar in midwives and students (p=0.083). However, midwives were more aware than students that Chlamydia are acquired through sexual contact (84.1% vs 58.7%; p=0.004) and that chlamydial infection is frequently asymptomatic (72.9% vs 37.9%; p=0.001). Knowledge of the consequences was poor in both groups, but it was relatively better in midwives; only 7.5% of the midwives did not know any of the potential sequelae of chlamydial infection compared with 24.1% of the students (p=0.006). In contrast, the majority of both midwives and students were aware that when chlamydial infection is diagnosed in a woman, both she and her partner should receive treatment (90.7% vs 93.2%; p = 0.901). In conclusion, an important proportion of midwifery students ignore important aspects of chlamydial infection. Therefore, it is important to improve the educational curriculum in midwifery schools in order to maximize the contribution of midwives to decrease the prevalence of chlamydial infection and of its complications.