Clinical efficacy of first and second series of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an established treatment for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). However, only limited data exists for the effect of multiple series of PRRT. The aim of this study was to investigate PFS and OS inNEN patients treated with multiple series of PRRT conforming to the ENETS treatment protocol. METHODS: We included all patients with gastrointestinal (GI), pancreatic and bronchopulmonary (BP) NEN treated with PRRT from 2008 to 2018. We used Kaplan-Meier estimation to evaluate PFS and OS with subgroup analysis of primary tumor, Ki67-index, type of radioisotope and number of PRRT series. RESULTS: 133 patients (female/male 61/72) were included, median age 70 (interquartile range 64-76) years. GI-NEN comprised 62%, pancreatic 23% and BP 11%. Median Ki67-index was 5%. After first PRRTG1- and G2-tumors had PFS of 25 and 22 months, compared to 11 months in G3-NENs (p < .05) and PFS was longer in G1/G2 GI-NENs than BP-NEN (30vs. 12 months, p < .05). After retreatment with a second series of PRRT, the overall PFS (G1-G3) was 19 months, with G1- and G2-tumors having the highest PFS of 19 and 22 months, respectively. Overall, the GI and BP tumors had an OS of 54 and 51 months. CONCLUSIONS: PRRT is an effective therapy with long-term PFS and OS, especially in G1 and G2 NENs, and with better prognosis in GI-NEN compared with BP-NENs. OS and PFS was shorter after the second series of PRRT compared with the first, however results were still encouraging.

Clinical value of 11C-methionine positron emission tomography in persistent primary hyperparathyroidism-A case report with a mediastinal parathyroid adenoma.

INTRODUCTION: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a common endocrine disorder caused by pathologic growth of one or more of the parathyroid glands. Parathyroidectomies (PTX) in patients with PHPT are procedures with low morbidity, few complications, and a high cure rate. However, the parathyroid glands may be found at various anatomical locations and occasionally they are intrathoracic. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 57-year-old patient with PHPT. Before the first and second operation, the preoperative imaging indicated pathologic parathyroid tissue in the neck. Due to postoperative persistent hypercalcemia we performed a 11C-methionine positron emission tomography (11C-MET-PET/CT). The scan showed a focus with increased activity in the mediastinum. Due to persistent disease, an ectopic parathyroid gland in the mediastinum was suspected. At a third operation, the parathyroid adenoma was resected through an anterolateral thoracotomy. Biochemical values normalized and bone mineral density improved postoperatively. Hence, an ectopic localization of a parathyroid gland should be considered during the preoperative planning of a PTX, especially in the re-operative setting. A multidisciplinary effort is necessary to address an intrathoracic adenoma. CONCLUSION: Ectopic parathyroid glands should be suspected when positive sestaMIBI uptake is seen in the mediastinum and other types of imaging (e.g. contrast enhanced CT scan or PET-CT) may confirm the finding of an ectopic parathyroid adenoma. From the present case and previous studies we found 11C-MET-PET/CT valuable in difficult PHPT cases.

Do short-stretch bandages affect distal blood pressure in patients with mixed aetiology leg ulcers?

Compression is considered inappropriate for patients with mixed aetiology leg ulcers. However, digital blood pressure measurements suggest that short-stretch bandages do not increase the risk of peripheral ischaemia in these patients.

Reference data for distal blood pressure in healthy elderly and middle-aged individuals measured with the strain gauge technique. Part II: Distal blood pressure after exercise.

OBJECTIVE: Distal blood pressure (DBP) determination after an exercise test is used on suspicion of arterial peripheral vascular disease (apvd). In our department. the average age of these patients is about 60 years. The usual reference values for pressures after exercise were based on data collected in the early 1970s from healthy individuals in the age range 21-26 years. Our aims were to collect new reference data for DBP at ankle level after exercise based on older populations, and to compare between reference data for different age groups to find out whether the normal values are dependent on age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: DBP after exercise was measured using the strain-gauge technique on individuals in two groups: group I comprising 25 healthy persons aged between 61 and 82 years, and group II 14 healthy persons aged between 45 and 58 years. Strict rules of inclusion were followed. RESULTS: Normal values are dependent on age. The average differences (ankle DBP(after)-ankle DBP(before)) immediately after walking were 25 mmHg, 12 mmHg and -8 mmHg in group I, group II and the old data, respectively. Comparison among groups showed significant differences (p< or =0.01). CONCLUSION: Normal values for elderly and middle-aged persons are presented. Use of normal values based on young people may result in underestimation of DBP response and hence underestimation of the degree of possible apvd, especially in elderly individuals.

Reference data for distal blood pressure in healthy elderly and middle-aged individuals measured with the strain gauge technique. Part I: resting distal blood pressure.

OBJECTIVE: Most patients referred to our department for distal blood pressure (DBP) determination on suspicion of arterial peripheral vascular disease (apvd) are more than 60 years of age, whereas the only available reference data for resting pressure are based on data from healthy individuals aged between 43 and 57 years. Our aim was to investigate whether newly collected reference data for DBP measured using the strain-gauge technique in healthy subjects older than 60 years and in others between 45 and 58 years were significantly different from the old reference data used in daily practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: . Group I comprised 31 healthy persons aged between 61 and 87 years and group II 14 healthy middle-aged hospital staff members aged between 45 and 58 years. Strict rules of inclusion were followed. RESULTS: For group I, significantly greater gradients (DBP(toe) - systolic arm blood pressure and DBP(toe) - DBP(ankle)) were found in the new reference data compared to the old. No significant difference between the mean values of the gradient (DBP(ankle) - systolic arm blood pressure) was found between the old and new reference data, although the variation was significantly wider in the new reference data; the lower level of normality was therefore -15 mmHg compared to 0 mmHg in the old reference data. For group II, no significant differences between the gradients were found comparing the new and old reference data. CONCLUSION: These new data indicate that reference data gathered from middle-aged subjects should be changed when DBP measurements are used in patients older than 60 years of age.

Sources of variation in the determination of distal blood pressure measured using the strain gauge technique.

Using the determination of distal blood pressure (DBP) measured using the strain gauge technique as an example of a routine clinical physiological investigation involving many different observers (laboratory technicians), the present study was carried out to assess (1) the influence of the number of observers and the number of analyses made by each observer on the precision of a definitive value; and (2) the minimal difference between two determinations to detect a real change. A total of 45 patients participated in the study. They were all referred for DBP determination on suspicion of arterial peripheral vascular disease. In 30 of the patients, the DBP curves were read twice, with a 5-week interval, by 10 laboratory technicians. The results were analysed using the variance component model. The remaining 15 patients had their DBP determined twice on two different days with an interval of 1-3 days and the total day-to-day variation (SDdiff) of DBP was determined. The inter- and intraobserver variations were, respectively, 5.7 and 4.9 mmHg at ankle level and 3.5 and 2.7 mmHg at toe level. The index values as related to systolic pressure were somewhat lower. The mean day-to-day variation was 11 mmHg at ankle level and 10 mmHg at toe level, thereby giving a minimal significant difference between two DBP determinations of 22 mmHg at ankle and 20 mmHg at toe level. To decrease the value of SD (standard deviation) on a definitive determination of DBP and index values, it was slightly more effective if the value was based on two observers performing one independent DBP curve reading than if one observer made one or two DBP curve readings. The reduction in SDdiff was greatest at ankle level. The extent of the Sddiff decrease was greatest when two different observers made a single DBP reading each at both determinations compared with one different observer making two readings at each determination. Surprisingly, about half of the maximum reduction in the SDdiff was achieved just by increasing the number of observers from one to two. We have found variance component analyses to be a suitable method for determining intra- and interobserver variation when several different observers take part in a routine laboratory investigation. It may be applied to other laboratory methods such as renography, isotope cardiography and myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) scintigraphy, in which the final result may be affected by individual judgement during processing.