Patients Aged 80 or More With Distal Radius Fractures Have a Lower One-Year Mortality Rate Than Age- and Gender-Matched Controls: A Register-Based Study.

Introduction: With a rapidly ageing population, the number of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in the elderly will increase dramatically. The aim of this retrospective register study was to examine the 1- and 5-year mortality in DRF patients aged 80 years or more and correlate the overall survival to factors not related to the fracture itself. Material and Methods: Patients aged ≥80 diagnosed with DRFs in Lund University Hospital in Sweden in the period 2010-2012 were extracted from the prospective Lund Distal Radius Fracture register. One- and 5-year standardised mortality rates (SMRs) were calculated using the Swedish standard population as a reference. Medical records were searched for non-fracture-related factors including comorbidity, medications, cognitive impairment and type of living. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify prognostic factors for all-cause mortality. Results: The study cohort included 240 patients, with a mean age of 86. The overall 1-year mortality was 5% (n = 11/240) and the 5-year mortality was 44% (n = 105/240). The 1-year SMR was .44 (CI .18-.69, P < .01) when indirectly adjusted for age and gender and compared to the Swedish standard population. The 5-year SMR was .96 (CI .78-1.14). The patients' ability to live independently in their own home had the highest impact on survival. Discussion: The 1-year mortality rate among the super-elderly DRF patients was only 44% of that expected. Possibly, a DRF at this age could be a sign of a healthier and more active patient. Conclusions: The DRF patients aged 80 or more had a substantially lower mortality rate 1 year after fracture compared to the age- and gender-matched standard population. Patients living independently in their own homes had the longest life expectancy. Treatment should not be limited solely because of old age, but individualised according to the patient's ability and activity level.

Systemically administered zoledronic acid activates locally implanted synthetic hydroxyapatite particles enhancing peri-implant bone formation: A regenerative medicine approach to improve fracture fixation.

Fracture fixation in an ageing population is challenging and fixation failure increases mortality and societal costs. We report a novel fracture fixation treatment by applying a hydroxyapatite (HA) based biomaterial at the bone-implant interface and biologically activating the biomaterial by systemic administration of a bisphosphonate (zoledronic acid, ZA). We first used an animal model of implant integration and applied a calcium sulphate (CaS)/HA biomaterial around a metallic screw in the tibia of osteoporotic rats. Using systemic ZA administration at 2-weeks post-surgery, we demonstrated that the implant surrounded by HA particles showed significantly higher peri­implant bone formation compared to the unaugmented implants at 6-weeks. We then evaluated the optimal timing (day 1, 3, 7 and 14) of ZA administration to achieve a robust effect on peri­implant bone formation. Using fluorescent ZA, we demonstrated that the uptake of ZA in the CaS/HA material was the highest at 3- and 7-days post-implantation and the uptake kinetics had a profound effect on the eventual peri­implant bone formation. We furthered our concept in a feasibility study on trochanteric fracture patients randomized to either CaS/HA augmentation or no augmentation followed by systemic ZA treatment. Radiographically, the CaS/HA group showed signs of increased peri­implant bone formation compared with the controls. Finally, apart from HA, we demonstrated that the concept of biologically activating a ceramic material by ZA could also be applied to ß-tricalcium phosphate. This novel approach for fracture treatment that enhances immediate and long-term fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone could potentially reduce reoperations, morbidity and mortality. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: • Fracture fixation in an ageing population is challenging. Biomaterial-based augmentation of fracture fixation devices has been attempted but lack of satisfactory biological response limits their widespread use. • We report the biological activation of locally implanted microparticulate hydroxyapatite (HA) particles placed around an implant by systemic administration of the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZA). The biological activation of HA by ZA enhances peri­implant bone formation. •Timing of ZA administration after HA implantation is critical for optimal ZA uptake and consequently determines the extent of peri­implant bone formation. • We translate the developed concept from small animal models of implant integration to a proof-of-concept clinical study on osteoporotic trochanteric fracture patients. • ZA based biological activation can also be applied to other calcium phosphate biomaterials.

Virtual Follow up After Distal Radius Fracture Surgery-Patient Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The majority of patients with a distal radius fracture (DRF) are elderly, a group known to experience difficulties with new technology, partly due to a low level of digital literacy. At the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, during the spring 2020, patients that underwent DRF surgery had regular follow-ups replaced by video calls from their surgeon and physiotherapist. Afterward, patients answered questionnaires regarding health and digital literacy and took part in semistructured interviews regarding the experience of the virtual follow-up. By systemic text condensation, 2 major categories were identified: (1) The video call-new, but surprisingly simple: All but 1 found it easier than expected, and (2) Video calls-the patient's choice: All but 1 patient preferred video calls to physical visits for follow-up. This is the first mixed methods study to assess patients' experiences of digital follow-up after DRF surgery. This study indicates that digital follow-up was highly appreciated, even among patients with low levels of digital literacy. Digital technologies must be made suitable even for patients with inadequate levels of digital literacy.