Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Ophthalmol ; 93(8): e615-20, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26095771

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual field rate of progression of patients with treated ocular hypertension (OHT) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in clinical practice, using the mean deviation (MD) and the visual field index (VFI). METHODS: Non-interventional cohort study. From a large multicentre database representative of the French population, 441 eyes of 228 patients with treated OHT or POAG followed up at least 6 years with Humphrey 24.2 Sita-Standard visual field examination at least twice a year were identified. From initial data, eyes were classified in five groups: 121 with OHT, 188 with early glaucoma (MD greater than -6 dB), 45 with moderate glaucoma (MD -6 to -12 dB), 41 with advanced glaucoma (MD -12 to -18 dB) and 46 with severe glaucoma (MD less than -18 dB). Rate of progression during the follow-up period was calculated using the trend analysis of the Guided Progression Analysis software. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 8.4 ± 2.7 years and the mean number of visual field, 18.4 ± 3.5. In eyes with OHT, rate of progression was -0.09 dB/year (-0.17%VFI/year). In eyes with POAG, rate of progression was -0.32 dB/year (-0.83%VFI/year) in eyes with early glaucoma, -0.52 dB/year (-1.81%VFI/year) in moderate glaucoma, -0.54 dB/year (-2.35%VFI/year) in advanced glaucoma and -0.45 dB/year (-1.97%VFI/year) in severe glaucoma. In eyes with POAG, a significant progression (p < 0.05) was detected in 159 of 320 eyes (49.7%) with trend analysis and 117 of 320 eyes (36.6%, likely progression) or 183 of 320 eyes (57.2%, possible and likely progression) with event analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Primary open-angle glaucoma is a progressive disease in the majority of patients despite cautioned treatment and follow-up. The rate of progression varies greatly among subjects.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma, Open-Angle/diagnosis , Vision Disorders/diagnosis , Visual Fields , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Female , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/drug therapy , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Male , Middle Aged , Ocular Hypertension/diagnosis , Ocular Hypertension/drug therapy , Ocular Hypertension/physiopathology , Risk Factors , Vision Disorders/drug therapy , Vision Disorders/physiopathology , Visual Field Tests
2.
Ophthalmology ; 121(10): 1998-2003, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24939513

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term reproducibility of diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) patterns in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). DESIGN: Database study. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-two patients with POAG. METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients with POAG who underwent 4 diurnal IOP curve measurements 6 months apart with Goldmann applanation tonometry recorded in the sitting position at 9 am, 10 am, 11 am, noon, 2 pm, 3 pm, 4 pm, and 5 pm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intervisit agreement of IOP by time point and of diurnal IOP curve parameters (mean, standard deviation, range, maximum, maximum hour, minimum, and minimum hour) was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Analyses were performed in all eyes and separately in eyes with and without hypotensive medications, and in eyes naïve and non-naïve of filtering surgery. RESULTS: Between-visit agreement of IOP values at each time point was generally poor, with ICCs ranging from 0.26 to 0.77 in all patients (1 of 8 time points with ICC >0.75), from -0.07 to 0.60 in patients without hypotensive medications (zero time points with ICC >0.75), from 0.29 to 0.80 in patients with hypotensive medications (3 time points with ICCs >0.75), from 0.21 to 0.68 in filtering surgery-naïve patients (zero time points with ICC >0.75), and from 0.21 to 0.87 in patients with previous filtering surgeries (5 time points with ICCs >0.75). The predictive value of the first diurnal IOP curve to estimate the risk of IOP fluctuations during the 3 subsequent curves was limited (only 6.4% of the patients with an IOP range ≥30% of the mean IOP on the first curve presented similar fluctuations on the 3 subsequent curves; 77.1% of the patients who did not have an IOP range ≥30% of the mean IOP on the first curve had an IOP range ≥30% of the mean IOP on at least 1 of the 3 subsequent curves). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with POAG do not manifest a reproducible diurnal IOP pattern from month to month. A single diurnal IOP curve in patients with POAG poorly characterizes IOP fluctuations and has limited value in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Glaucoma/physiopathology , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Tonometry, Ocular
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...