A novel method to measure sensory nerve conduction of the posterior antebrachial cutaneous nerve.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Posterior antebrachial cutaneous (PABC) nerve conduction studies could be useful for distinguishing PABC neuropathy from C7 radiculopathy. In the conventional method using an antidromic method, the sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) is sometimes followed by a large volume-conducted motor potential. In this report we describe a reliable nerve conduction study using an orthodromic method for recording SNAPs of the PABC nerve. METHODS: Thirty-six healthy volunteers participated in this study. PABC SNAPs were recorded by placing a surface-active electrode 2 cm anterior to the lateral epicondyle. The PABC nerve was stimulated 10 cm distal to the active recording electrode along a line from the recording point to the mid-dorsum of the wrist, midway between the radial and ulnar styloid processes. We also performed PABC nerve conduction studies using an antidromic method and compared the findings. RESULTS: PABC SNAPs were recorded bilaterally from all subjects. The mean peak-to-peak amplitude for SNAPs was 13.4 ± 4.8 µV. Mean maximum conduction velocity was 62.7 ± 3.9 m/s and mean negative peak conduction velocity was 51.2 ± 2.6 m/s. The mean side-to-side difference in amplitude was 22.1 ± 16.0%. The mean amplitude of SNAPs obtained by our method was 48.9% higher than that of SNAPs obtained by the conventional method (13.4 vs 9.0 µV; P < .001). In contrast to the conventional method, our method enabled SNAPs to be recorded without a volume-conducted motor potential. DISCUSSION: The higher mean amplitude of SNAPs with our method enables them to be obtained easily.

Anatomical variations of the superficial branch of the radial nerve and the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve: A detailed electrophysiological study.

INTRODUCTION: In this study we evaluated anatomic variations of the superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) and the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve (DBUN) electrophysiologically. METHODS: Antidromic nerve conduction studies (NCS) of the SBRN and DBUN were performed on healthy individuals. To identify individual responses from the distal branches of the SBRN and DBUN, sensory nerve action potentials of each finger (lateral side/medial side) were recorded. RESULTS: NCS were performed in 50 hands of 27 healthy control subjects. The thumb and the index finger were supplied by the SBRN in all cases. The lateral and medial sides of the third finger were supplied by the SBRN in 94.0% and 74.0% of the cases, but the lateral and medial sides of the fourth finger were supplied by the SBRN in only 10.0% and 2.0% of cases. The fifth finger and the medial side of the fourth finger were always supplied by the DBUN. The lateral side of the fourth finger was supplied by the DBUN in 98.0% of cases, but the lateral and medial sides of the third finger were supplied by the DBUN in 40.0% and 70.0% of cases. Dual innervation by the SBRN and DBUN was found in 34.0% and 46.0% of the lateral and medial sides of the third finger, but in only 8.0% and 2.0% of the lateral and medial sides of the fourth finger. DISCUSSION: There are considerable anatomic variations of the SBRN and DBUN in healthy individuals.

Relationship between the Diabetic Polyneuropathy Index and the Neurological Findings of Diabetic Polyneuropathy.

Objective To achieve an accurate quantification in diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN), we developed a new electrophysiological index that we called the DPN index. The relationship between the DPN index and the neurological findings in diabetic patients was assessed. Methods The DPN index was calculated by the mean value of percentages of four parameters (tibial compound muscle action potential amplitude / F wave minimum latency, sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude / sensory nerve conduction velocity) against the mean normal values. Twenty healthy subjects were recruited as a control group. Patients A total of 348 diabetic patients who were hospitalized in our hospital during the period from December 2016 to August 2019 were retrospectively studied. The correlations between the DPN index and five neurological findings (subjective sensory symptoms, diminished or absent Achilles tendon reflex, impaired tactile and vibration sense, low coefficient of variation of R-R interval) were evaluated. Results The DPN index in healthy subjects was 129.3±32.7%. The DPN index in diabetic patients with one or more neurological findings was significantly lower than that in diabetic patients without any neurological findings (p<0.01: 89.3±27.8% vs. 118.4±21.2%). For each of the five neurological findings, the DPN index in the group with an abnormality was significantly lower than that in the group without any abnormality (each p<0.01). Spearman's correlation coefficients indicated that a greater number of neurological findings resulted in a lower DPN index (r=-0.711, p<0.01). Conclusion Our study suggested that the DPN index is useful for evaluating the severity of DPN.

Influence of placement sites of the active recording electrode on CMAP configuration in the trapezius muscle.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated how the active electrode placement site influences compound muscle action potential (CMAP) configuration of the upper trapezius muscle (TM). METHODS: A nerve conduction study of the accessory nerve was performed, and the CMAPs obtained with two different placement sites, i.e., placement of the active recording electrode on the belly of the upper TM (CMAP-A) and placement of the electrode 2 cm behind the belly (CMAP-B), were compared. CMAPs were also obtained with the active recording electrode placed in the supraspinous fossa (CMAP-C). RESULTS: All CMAPs were recorded from 21 healthy volunteers. The mean peak-to-peak amplitude of CMAP-B was 3.4 mV higher than that of CMAP-A (11.0 ±â€¯4.0 mV vs. 14.4 ±â€¯4.9 mV; P < 0.01). The mean peak-to-peak amplitude of CMAP-C was 10.3 ±â€¯5.0 mV. CONCLUSIONS: CMAP of the upper TM was always higher when the active recording electrode was placed 2 cm behind the belly of the muscle. SIGNIFICANCE: When stimulating the accessory nerve, a current spread occurs to the C5 spinal nerve root and another CMAP originating from the supraspinatus muscle occurs in the supraspinous fossa. The volume conduction from the supraspinatus muscle affects the active recording electrode on the TM, resulting in an increase in CMAP amplitude.