Adverse reactions following transfusion of blood components, with a focus on some rare reactions: Reports to the International Haemovigilance Network Database (ISTARE) in 2012-2016.

OBJECTIVES: The International Haemovigilance Network's (IHN) ISTARE database collects surveillance data on all adverse reactions (AR) associated with transfusion of blood and blood components, facilitating the sharing of best practice and benchmarking for improving blood safety and quality. Up to 2012, no publications discussed certain rare AR. The aim of this study is to examine ISTARE data on AR from 2012 to 2016, focusing on hypotensive reactions, post-transfusion purpura (PTP), transfusion-associated graft versus host disease (TA-GvHD), hyperkalemia and hypocalcemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: National Haemovigilance Systems (HVS), provided aggregate annual data on AR by type of reaction, severity, imputability to transfusion, and blood component implicated. Twenty-nine HVS provided 104 annual reports covering 107,778,290 blood units issued. RESULTS: Among AR reported, 25% were serious, including 368 deaths. The 284 transfusion-transmitted infections included 187 bacterial infections, 84 viral and 13 parasitic or fungal; nine deaths resulted. AR related to the respiratory system transfusion-associated circulatory overload, transfusion-related acute lung injury and transfusion-associated dyspnoea accounted for 8.3% of all AR, 20.1% of serious, and 52.2% of deaths. Of 1634 rare AR, 1565 were hypotensive, 38 PTP, 17 GvHD, 9 hyperkalemia and 5 hypercalcemia. Half were serious and 16 fatalities were recorded (13 hypotensive, 2 GvHD, one PTP). Among 14 countries that reported any hypotensive AR, incidences diverged widely. CONCLUSIONS: ARs in this group are frequently severe or life-threatening. Hypotensive AR are the most common, but may have been overlooked and counted under allergic and other AR presenting with hypotension. Compliance with the ISBT definition may be suboptimal, thus its real incidence may be higher. Data on GvHD may contribute to clarifying the role of leukodepletion with or without irradiation. ISTARE continues to be a useful surveillance tool for all transfusion AR and provides relevant insights into overlooked and rare AR, thus offering important contributions towards maximising transfusion safety.

Post-donation information and haemovigilance reporting for COVID-19 in Greece: Information supporting the absence of SARS-CoV-2 possible transmission through blood components.

BACKGROUND: Although the SARS-CoV-2 virus is transmitted mainly through the respiratory tract, possible transmission by transfusion from asymptomatic carriers should be explored. As yet there are no reports of transfusion transmission of COVID-19. Haemovigilance findings within a three-month surveillance period during the new coronavirus pandemic are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Due to great demand and shortage, blood sessions in outpatient facilities were organized during the high prevalence period of COVID-19, alongside a national plan to monitor the evolving public health situation by random molecular screening of high-risk groups of the population. Haemovigilance protocols were implemented as well as surveillance for any COVID-19 case reported post-transfusion. A 14-day quarantine and follow-up molecular and antibody testing of any COVID-19 positive case was obligatory. RESULTS: Post-donation, post-transfusion information and molecular testing of swab samples collected from three asymptomatic donors at risk for COVID-19, revealed the case of an immunosupressed patient who had been transfused with whole blood derived platelets from a donor subsequently diagnosed with COVID-19. The recipient exhibited no symptoms of the disease. Molecular and antibody testing results were negative. CONCLUSION: Haemovigilance provided information supporting the absence of transfusion transmission of COVID-19, thus strengthening the hypothesis that, even if it cannot yet be definitively ruled out, COVID-19 is not transmitted through blood transfusion. As of early June 2020, a perfect test does not exist, therefore haemovigilance along with the implementation of strict proactive measures is crucial to identify eluding asymptomatic individuals and ensure blood safety during the pandemic.

Haemovigilance data on the use of methylene blue virally inactivated fresh frozen plasma with the Theraflex MB-Plasma System in comparison to quarantine plasma: 11 years' experience.

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: Haemovigilance is an effective tool for identifying adverse effects of blood components. We analyse cumulative haemovigilance data in order to compare the two secured therapeutic plasmas that have been in use for more than 11 years in Greece - methylene blue-treated fresh frozen plasma (MB-FFP) and quarantine fresh frozen plasma (Q-FFP) - regarding safety and adverse events. METHODS/MATERIALS: Data from the centralised active haemovigilance system of Greece for the period 2001-2011 were used to examine the association between FFP types and adverse events. Post-transfusion information on infectious and non-infectious adverse events was analysed. Events were examined by reaction type, severity and imputability to transfusion. RESULTS: The incidence of adverse events was higher with Q-FFP (1:3620) than MB-FFP (1 : 24 593) by a factor of 6·79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2·52-27·8]. Allergic adverse events were also commoner with Q-FFP (1 : 7489) than with MB-FFP (1:24 593), by a factor of 3·28 (95% CI 1·17-13·7). All adverse reactions experienced by the MB plasma recipients were considered to be mild. CONCLUSION: Haemovigilance over 11 years has demonstrated the long-term safety of MB-FFP in comparison to untreated quarantine FFP. In addition to lowering the adverse event rate, implementing the system on a national scale in at-risk countries would presumably reduce the transmission of severe viral infections including emerging infectious diseases by transfusion.