Prostate-specific antigen and androgens in African-American and white normal subjects and prostate cancer patients.

Prostate cancer in African Americans is more aggressive and common than in any other racial group. An endocrine mechanism has been proposed to account for this racial difference. However, androgen levels in African-American elderly normal subjects and prostate cancer patients have been insufficiently studied. Because the Albert Einstein Medical Center (AEMC) has a large African-American population, we could contribute racial data from which observations could be made within this study and in past and future studies. Blood from 38 screened men (mean age 65) with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) less than 4 ng/mL and normal rectal examination seen at the AEMC Cancer Center was studied using standard radioimmunoassays. The blood samples also served as our control. Our experimental group consisted of 51 prostate cancer patients (mean age 71 years), all of whom had nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Subjects were categorized by cancer status, race, and age group. In our screened subjects, PSA, testosterone, and dihydrotestosterone were not higher in African Americans than in whites. Furthermore, our prostate cancer patients demonstrated no significant racial variation for PSA, testosterone, and dihydrotestosterone. Our data also did not indicate any correlation between PSA and androgen levels in our cancer patients. In our population of elderly men, no racial differences in androgen levels were found. Androgen levels did not correlate with PSA levels in prostate cancer patients.

An open trial of guanfacine in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Medications such as clonidine have been shown to facilitate calming, to enhance frustration tolerance, and to reduce aggression in hyperactive children. The use of guanfacine (Tenex), an alpha 2 noradrenergic agonist similar to clonidine, was studied as an alternative because of its longer excretion half-life, decreased sedative side effects, and more selective binding profile. METHOD: Thirteen psychiatric outpatients diagnosed with ADHD were rated at baseline and while taking guanfacine to determine its efficacy as a treatment for ADHD. Comparisons of Conners parent ratings within subject were used to measure behavioral changes in the subjects. RESULTS: During guanfacine treatment, patients' mean scores improved significantly overall (1.27 off, 0.85 on, t = 2.55, p < .015) and in Conners Hyperactivity (1.63 off, 0.94 on, t = 3.69, p < .01), Inattention (1.92 off, 1.21 on, t = 3.32, p < .01), and Immaturity (1.81 off, 0.92 on, t = 3.77, p < .01) factors. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study indicates that guanfacine is a beneficial and useful treatment of ADHD, reducing hyperactive behaviors and enabling greater attentional ability with minimal side effects. We are currently collecting data in a double-blind study measuring guanfacine's efficacy with and in comparison to methylphenidate.