Blood Transcriptomes of SARS-CoV-2-Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients Associated with Immune Insufficiency Proportionate to Severity.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with COVID-19, kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have poor outcomes compared with non-KTRs. To provide insight into management of immunosuppression during acute illness, we studied immune signatures from the peripheral blood during and after COVID-19 infection from a multicenter KTR cohort. METHODS: We ascertained clinical data by chart review. A single sample of blood was collected for transcriptome analysis. Total RNA was poly-A selected and RNA was sequenced to evaluate transcriptome changes. We also measured cytokines and chemokines of serum samples collected during acute infection. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients with COVID-19 in KTRs were enrolled, including 31 with acute COVID-19 (<4 weeks from diagnosis) and 33 with post-acute COVID-19 (>4 weeks postdiagnosis). In the blood transcriptome of acute cases, we identified genes in positive or negative association with COVID-19 severity scores. Functional enrichment analyses showed upregulation of neutrophil and innate immune pathways but downregulation of T cell and adaptive immune activation pathways. This finding was independent of lymphocyte count, despite reduced immunosuppressant use in most KTRs. Compared with acute cases, post-acute cases showed "normalization" of these enriched pathways after 4 weeks, suggesting recovery of adaptive immune system activation despite reinstitution of immunosuppression. Analysis of the non-KTR cohort with COVID-19 showed significant overlap with KTRs in these functions. Serum inflammatory cytokines followed an opposite trend (i.e., increased with disease severity), indicating that blood lymphocytes are not the primary source. CONCLUSIONS: The blood transcriptome of KTRs affected by COVID-19 shows decreases in T cell and adaptive immune activation pathways during acute disease that, despite reduced immunosuppressant use, associate with severity. These pathways show recovery after acute illness.

Blood transcriptomes of SARS-CoV-2 infected kidney transplant recipients demonstrate immune insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with COVID-19 have poor outcomes compared to non-KTRs. To provide insight into management of immunosuppression during acute illness, we studied immune signatures from the peripheral blood during and after COVID-19 infection from a multicenter KTR cohort.□. METHODS: Clinical data were collected by chart review. PAXgene blood RNA was poly-A selected and RNA sequencing was performed to evaluate transcriptome changes. RESULTS: A total of 64 cases of COVID-19 in KTRs were enrolled, including 31 acute cases (< 4 weeks from diagnosis) and 33 post-acute cases (>4 weeks). In the blood transcriptome of acute cases, we identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in positive or negative association COVID-19 severity scores. Functional enrichment analyses showed upregulation of neutrophil and innate immune pathways, but downregulation of T-cell and adaptive immune-activation pathways proportional to severity score. This finding was independent of lymphocyte count and despite reduction in immunosuppression (IS) in most KTRs. Comparison with post-acute cases showed "normalization" of these enriched pathways after >4 weeks, suggesting recovery of adaptive immune system activation despite reinstitution of IS. The latter analysis was adjusted for COVID-19 severity score and lymphocyte count. DEGs associated with worsening disease severity in a non-KTR cohort with COVID-19 (GSE152418) showed significant overlap with KTRs in these identified enriched pathways. CONCLUSION: Blood transcriptome of KTRs affected by COVID-19 shows decrease in T-cell and adaptive immune activation pathways during acute disease that associate with severity despite IS reduction and show recovery after acute illness. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are reported to have worse outcomes with COVID-19, and empiric reduction of maintenance immunosuppression is pursued. Surprisingly, reported rates of acute rejection have been low despite reduced immunosuppression. We evaluated the peripheral blood transcriptome of 64 KTRs either during or after acute COVID-19. We identified transcriptomic signatures consistent with suppression of adaptive T-cell responses which significantly associated with disease severity and showed evidence of recovery after acute disease, even after adjustment for lymphocyte number. Our transcriptomic findings of immune-insufficiency during acute COVID-19 provide an explanation for the low rates of acute rejection in KTRs despite reduced immunosuppression. Our data support the approach of temporarily reducing T -cell-directed immunosuppression in KTRs with acute COVID-19.

Genetic and Epidemiologic Analyses of an Outbreak of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia Among Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis jirovecii is an opportunistic fungus that causes Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in immunocompromised hosts. Over an 11-month period, we observed a rise in cases of PCP among kidney-transplant recipients (KTR), prompting an outbreak investigation. METHODS: Clinical and epidemiologic data were collected for KTR diagnosed with PCP between July 2019 and May 2020. Pneumocystis strain typing was performed using restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses and multilocus sequence typing in combination with next-generation sequencing. A transmission map was drawn, and a case-control analysis was performed to determine risk factors associated with PCP. RESULTS: Nineteen cases of PCP in KTR were diagnosed at a median of 79 months post-transplantation; 8 received monthly belatacept infusions. Baseline characteristics were similar for KTR on belatacept versus other regimens; the number of clinic visits was numerically higher for the belatacept group during the study period (median 7.5 vs 3). Molecular typing of respiratory specimens from 9 patients revealed coinfection with up to 7 P. jirovecii strains per patient. A transmission map suggested multiple clusters of interhuman transmission. In a case-control univariate analysis, belatacept, lower absolute lymphocyte count, non-White race, and more transplant clinic visits were associated with an increased risk of PCP. In multivariate and prediction power estimate analyses, frequent clinic visits was the strongest risk factor for PCP. CONCLUSIONS: Increased clinic exposure appeared to facilitate multiple clusters of nosocomial PCP transmission among KTR. Belatacept was a risk factor for PCP, possibly by increasing clinic exposure through the need for frequent visits for monthly infusions.

Impact of Low-Dose Fluconazole on Tacrolimus Dosing in Renal Transplant.

BACKGROUND: The interaction between azole antifungal therapy and immunosuppressant tacrolimus (TAC) is a barrier to use. OBJECTIVE: This study quantified the drug interaction between low-dose fluconazole (LDF) and TAC to determine the appropriate TAC dose adjustment when used concurrently in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of renal transplant patients >18 years who received LDF or nystatin (NYS), and TAC. The primary outcome was the difference in tacrolimus total daily dose (TAC TDD) for LDF versus NYS groups. Secondary outcomes included days with supratherapeutic, therapeutic and subtherapeutic tacrolimus levels, time to therapeutic level, incidence of adverse drug reactions and graft rejection. RESULTS: We evaluated 94 patients and included 81. Low-dose fluconazole received a greater TAC TDD prior to post-operative day (POD) 10 (10.5 ± 4.7 mg vs. 7.1 ± 4.5 mg, p < 0.001), but a decreased TAC TDD POD 10 - 30 (8.6 ± 2.2 mg vs. 9.8 ± 0.8 mg, p < 0.001) and following LDF discontinuation (6.9 ± 0.1 mg vs. 9.0 ± 0.4 mg, p < 0.001). Low-dose fluconazole had more patient-days with supratherapeutic (17.9 ± 7.0 vs. 13.9 ± 8.5; p = 0.02) but fewer with subtherapeutic (6.7 ± 5.7 vs. 12.9 ± 7.2; p < 0.01) TAC levels. There was no difference in patient-days with therapeutic TAC levels (15.9 ± 5.8 vs. 14.4 ± 6.6, p = 0.28), meanwhile LDF required less patient-days to therapeutic TAC level (7.1 ± 2.7 vs. 11.5 ± 7.7; p < 0.01). There was no difference in adverse drug reactions between groups and no incidence of graft rejection. CONCLUSION: A 20% reduction in TAC TDD is warranted in renal transplant patients when used concomitantly with LDF to achieve therapeutic levels.

Evaluating the Impact and Rationale of Race-Specific Estimations of Kidney Function: Estimations from U.S. NHANES, 2015-2018.

BACKGROUND: Standard equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) employ race multipliers, systematically inflating eGFR for Black patients. Such inflation is clinically significant because eGFR thresholds of 60, 30, and 20 ml/min/1.73m2 guide kidney disease management. Racialized adjustment of eGFR in Black Americans may thereby affect their clinical care. In this study, we analyze and extrapolate national data to assess potential impacts of the eGFR race adjustment on qualification for kidney disease diagnosis, nephrologist referral, and transplantation listing. METHODS: Using population-representative cross-sectional data from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2015-2018, eGFR values for Black Americans were calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation with and without the 1.21 race-specific coefficient using cohort data on age, sex, race, and serum creatinine. FINDINGS: Without the MDRD eGFR race adjustment, 3.3 million (10.4%) more Black Americans would reach a diagnostic threshold for Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease, 300,000 (0.7%) more would qualify for beneficial nephrologist referral, and 31,000 (0.1%) more would become eligible for transplant evaluation and waitlist inclusion. INTERPRETATION: These findings suggest eGFR race coefficients may contribute to racial differences in the management of kidney. We provide recommendations for addressing this issue at institutional and individual levels. FUNDING: No external funding was received for this study.

Identifying a Kidney Transplant Recipient COVID Phenotype to Aid Test Utilization in the Setting of Limited Testing Availability-Does One Exist?

The high morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 in immunocompetent patients raises significant concern for immunosuppressed kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This level of concern, both on the part of the KTRs and transplant professionals, is heightened by a lack of prior knowledge on how Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome 2 virus (SARS-CoV-2) may manifest differently in immunosuppressed patients. Characterizing how KTRs may present differently than the general population would allow for more targeted and timely evaluation and treatment of KTRs with COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Without prior knowledge of how this virus would affect our transplant center's delivery of care to KTRs who are SARS-CoV-2 positive or patients under investigation, and in the setting of limited testing availability, we initiated a quality assurance and improvement project (QAPI) to track KTRs followed at our transplant center through the SARS-CoV-2 testing process. RESULTS: Of the 53 symptomatic patients, 20 (38%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 either on presentation to the emergency department or referral to a designated outpatient testing center. In addition, 16 (80%) of the 20 patients who tested positive required inpatient treatment. Intriguingly, patients with a history of polyoma BK viremia (BKV) had a higher incidence of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 compared to patients without a history of BKV (80% and 28%, respectively; P = .002). The Positive Predictive Value and Likelihood ratio was 80% and 6.6 for this association, respectively. Among our KTRs tested, those receiving belatacept had a lower likelihood of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. This finding approached, but did not achieve, statistical significance (P = .06).

The Role of the General Nephrologist in Evaluating Patients for Kidney Transplantation: Core Curriculum 2020.

Transplantation is the preferred modality of replacement therapy for most patients with kidney failure. In the United States, more than 3,000 new patients are registered each month on the kidney transplant waiting list for this life-saving therapy. A potential kidney transplant recipient's evaluation typically begins with a referral by the general nephrologist to a transplantation center. In this installment in the Core Curriculum in Nephrology, we endeavor to achieve a shared understanding of the patient factors that contribute to optimal patient and allograft outcomes following kidney transplantation. In addition, we provide a primer on the routine listing, evaluation, testing, and candidate selection process in an effort to demystify the current criteria commonly used by transplantation centers. Issues common to a majority of candidates, including cardiovascular health, frailty as a measure of biological age, history of prior malignancy, and high body mass index are reviewed in detail. With this knowledge, we hope to facilitate improved communication between general and transplantation nephrologists.

Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Pancreatic Transplantation.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation but can rarely occur after solid organ transplants. Small bowel and liver transplants are typically implicated, but solid organ transplant-associated GVHD has also been associated with other organs. We present a 40-year-old diabetic woman who underwent renal followed by pancreatic transplantation over a span of 21 months and ultimately developed acute classic GVHD. The diagnosis proved to be challenging in the context of confounding infections and inconclusive bone marrow and skin biopsy findings. She had multiorgan failure at the time of endoscopic confirmation and died after having minimal response to aggressive immunosuppression.

New England BK consortium: Regional survey of BK screening and management protocols in comparison to published consensus guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) continues to impact renal transplant recipients (RTR). The New England BK Consortium aims to jointly optimize screening and management of BKPyV. METHODS: Our first project was to survey centers' BKPyV screening protocols and compare them to consensus guidelines. RESULTS: Thirteen of 15 centers (86.7%) returned the survey. Only two center reported using monitoring parameters that were in line with consensus guidelines for BKPyV screening, while the majority of centers reported less intensive methods and shorter duration. One center reported performing renal biopsies in all patients with plasma viral loads >10 000 copies/mL, while all other centers only perform for-cause biopsies. For presumptive nephropathy, 11 centers recommend a biopsy for confirmation. For management of documented BKPyV-associated nephropathy, 12 centers propose further immunosuppression reduction. Nine centers report CNI dose reduction as their primary treatment. More than half of centers surveyed reported use of leflunomide, cidofovir or intravenous immunoglobulin. CONCLUSIONS: There was a large variance in BKPyV screening and management strategies among centers. Due to these results, all participating centers agreed to implement uniform screening and aim to optimize management protocols.

New Organ Allocation System for Combined Liver-Kidney Transplants and the Availability of Kidneys for Transplant to Patients with Stage 4-5 CKD.

A new proposal has been created for establishing medical criteria for organ allocation in recipients receiving simultaneous liver-kidney transplants. In this article, we describe the new policy, elaborate on the points of greatest controversy, and offer a perspective on the policy going forward. Although we applaud the fact that simultaneous liver-kidney transplant activity will now be monitored and appreciate the creation of medical criteria for allocation in simultaneous liver-kidney transplants, we argue that some of the criteria proposed, especially those for allocating a kidney to a liver recipient with AKI, are too liberal. We call on the nephrology community to follow the consequences of this new policy and push for a re-examination of the longstanding policy of allocating kidneys to multiorgan transplant recipients before all other candidates. The charge to protect our system of equitable organ allocation is very challenging, but it is a challenge that we must embrace.

Delayed Graft Function Phenotypes and 12-Month Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) leading to delayed graft function (DGF), defined by the United Network for Organ Sharing as dialysis in the first week (UNOS-DGF), associates with poor kidney transplant outcomes. Controversies remain, however, about dialysis initiation thresholds and the utility for other criteria to denote less severe IRI, or slow graft function (SGF). METHODS: Multicenter, prospective study of deceased-donor kidney recipients to compare UNOS-DGF to a definition that combines impaired creatinine reduction in the first 48 hours or greater than 1 dialysis session for predicting 12-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We also assessed 10 creatinine and urine output-based SGF definitions relative to 12-month eGFR. RESULTS: In 560 recipients, 215 (38%) had UNOS-DGF, 330 (59%) met the combined definition, 14 (3%) died, and 23 (4%) had death-censored graft failure by 12 months. Both DGF definitions were associated with lower adjusted 12-month eGFR (95% confidence interval)-by 7.3 (3.6-10.9) and 7.4 (3.8-11.0) mL/min per 1.73 m, respectively. Adjusted relative risks for 12-month eGFR less than 30 mL/min per 1.73 m were 1.9 (1.2-3.1) and 2.1 (1.1-3.7), with unadjusted areas under the curve of 0.618 and 0.627, respectively. For SGF definitions, postoperative day (POD) 7 creatinine had the strongest association with 12-month eGFR, and POD5 creatinine and creatinine reduction between POD1 and POD2 demonstrated modest separations in 12-month eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: Although UNOS-DGF does not adequately predict 12-month function on its own, our findings do not support changing the definition. Postoperative day 7 creatinine is correlated with 12-month eGFR, but large translational studies are needed to understand the biological link between IRI severity at transplant and longer-term outcomes.

Duration of prophylaxis against fungal infection in kidney transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of 2 strategies that use nystatin to prevent thrush and Candida esophagitis in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of adult kidney transplant recipients at our center, where the protocol for prophylaxis against fungal infection was changed in March 2013. Before the protocol change, kidney transplant recipients received nystatin for 1 month (before group) and after the change they received nystatin for the duration of admission (after group). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of thrush and Candida esophagitis within 3 months after transplant. Analyses were conducted on all kidney transplant recipients (intention to treat) and on only those kidney transplant recipients who received at least 1 dose of nystatin (modified intention to treat). Additional data collected included the duration of nystatin and immunosuppression regimens. The Student t test and Fisher exact test were used to calculate P values for continuous and categorical data. RESULTS: A total of 84 kidney transplant recipients, 42 in each cohort, were included in the analysis. The groups did not differ significantly at baseline. Nystatin was administered for a mean of 29 days in the before group and 5.74 days in the after group. Overall, 3 kidney transplant recipients (4%), all from the after group, experienced an episode of thrush and no patients experienced Candida esophagitis. Two recipients who experienced thrush did not receive any nystatin. CONCLUSIONS: Limiting the administration of nystatin to the duration of admission after transplant may be sufficient for prophylaxis of fungal infections in kidney transplant recipients.

Renal cancer in kidney transplanted patients.

Renal cancer occurs more frequently in renal transplanted patients than in the general population, affecting native kidneys in 90% of cases and the graft in 10 %. In addition to general risk factors, malignancy susceptibility may be influenced by immunosuppressive therapy, the use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) as compared with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and the length of dialysis treatment. Acquired cystic kidney disease may increase the risk for renal cancer after transplantation, while autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease does not seem to predispose to cancer development. Annual ultrasound evaluation seems appropriate in patients with congenital or acquired cystic disease or even a single cyst in native kidneys, and every 2 years in patients older than 60 years if they were on dialysis for more than 5 years before transplantation. Immunosuppression should be lowered in patients who develop renal cancer, by reduction or withdrawal of CNI. Although more evidence is still needed, it seems reasonable to shift patients from CNI to everolimus or sirolimus if not already treated with one of these drugs, with due caution in subjects with chronic allograft nephropathy.

Oncologic issues and kidney transplantation: a review of frequency, mortality, and screening.

Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk for development of malignancy compared with the general population, and malignancies occur at an earlier age. This increased risk, as expressed by the standard incidence ratio (SIR), varies widely, but it is highest in malignancies triggered by oncogenic viruses. For other cancers, this increased risk is the direct consequence of immunosuppressants promoting tumor growth and lowering immune system tumor surveillance. In this review, we briefly discuss the common malignancies with increased risk after kidney transplantation, explore the pros and cons associated with screening, and summarize current prevention and treatment recommendations.