Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Cancer ; 109(9): 2412-23, 2013 Oct 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24129241

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adoptive therapy with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) induces durable complete responses (CR) in ∼20% of patients with metastatic melanoma. The recruitment of T cells through CXCR3/CCR5 chemokine ligands is critical for immune-mediated rejection. We postulated that polymorphisms and/or expression of CXCR3/CCR5 in TILs and the expression of their ligands in tumour influence the migration of TILs to tumours and tumour regression. METHODS: Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes from 142 metastatic melanoma patients enrolled in adoptive therapy trials were genotyped for CXCR3 rs2280964 and CCR5-Δ32 deletion, which encodes a protein not expressed on the cell surface. Expression of CXCR3/CCR5 in TILs and CXCR3/CCR5 and ligand genes in 113 available parental tumours was also assessed. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte data were validated by flow cytometry (N=50). RESULTS: The full gene expression/polymorphism model, which includes CXCR3 and CCR5 expression data, CCR5-Δ32 polymorphism data and their interaction, was significantly associated with both CR and overall response (OR; P=0.0009, and P=0.007, respectively). More in detail, the predicted underexpression of both CXCR3 and CCR5 according to gene expression and polymorphism data (protein prediction model, PPM) was associated with response to therapy (odds ratio=6.16 and 2.32, for CR and OR, respectively). Flow cytometric analysis confirmed the PPM. Coordinate upregulation of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL5 in pretreatment tumour biopsies was associated with OR. CONCLUSION: Coordinate overexpression of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL5 in pretreatment tumours was associated with responsiveness to treatment. Conversely, CCR5-Δ32 polymorphism and CXCR3/CCR5 underexpression influence downregulation of the corresponding receptors in TILs and were associated with likelihood and degree of response.


Subject(s)
Interleukin-2/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/metabolism , Receptors, CCR5/metabolism , Receptors, CXCR3/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Cell Movement/drug effects , Cell Movement/genetics , Female , Gene Expression , Genotype , Humans , Ligands , Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/drug effects , Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/pathology , Male , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Polymorphism, Genetic , Receptors, CCR5/genetics , Receptors, CXCR3/genetics , Signal Transduction , Up-Regulation , Young Adult
2.
Br J Cancer ; 109(1): 76-82, 2013 Jul 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23807161

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several lines of evidence suggest a dichotomy between immune active and quiescent cancers, with the former associated with a good prognostic phenotype and better responsiveness to immunotherapy. Central to such dichotomy is the master regulator of the acute inflammatory process interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-1. However, it remains unknown whether the responsiveness of IRF-1 to cytokines is able to differentiate cancer immune phenotypes. METHODS: IRF-1 activation was measured in 15 melanoma cell lines at basal level and after treatment with IFN-γ, TNF-α and a combination of both. Microarray analysis was used to compare transcriptional patterns between cell lines characterised by high or low IRF-1 activation. RESULTS: We observed a strong positive correlation between IRF-1 activation at basal level and after IFN-γ and TNF-α treatment. Microarray demonstrated that three cell lines with low and three with high IRF-1 inducible translocation scores differed in the expression of 597 transcripts. Functional interpretation analysis showed mTOR and Wnt/ß-cathenin as the top downregulated pathways in the cell lines with low inducible IRF-1 activation, suggesting that a low IRF-1 inducibility recapitulates a cancer phenotype already described in literature characterised by poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the central role of IRF-1 in influencing different tumour phenotypes.


Subject(s)
Interferon Regulatory Factor-1/metabolism , Interferon-gamma/pharmacology , Melanoma/immunology , Cell Line, Tumor , Enzyme Activation , Humans , Immunotherapy , Interferon-gamma/metabolism , Melanoma/therapy , NF-kappa B/metabolism , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/pharmacology , Wnt Proteins/metabolism , beta Catenin/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...