Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 277(8): 2325-2333, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32236708

ABSTRACT

AIM: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the neuromusculoskeletal late side effects and their impact on the quality of life of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiochemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were included. The mean follow-up was 61 months (range, 18-111 months). The median external radiotherapy dose applied to the nasopharynx and primary tumor was 70 Gy (range, 61-73 Gy). The mean dose received by the temporomandibular joint in the dose-volume histograms of these patients was 60.7 Gy. The maximal doses of the muscles responsible for cervical motion in different ranges were greater than 60 Gy, and the mean doses were greater than 40 Gy in the muscle groups, except for the extensor muscles. RESULTS: Two patients had brachial plexus involvement, while 89% of the patients had restriction in flexion and extension movements. Of the patients, 52% had trismus. There was a significant correlation between extension restriction and general heath score and the physical subscale of the quality-of-life questionnaire (p = 0.01). There was also a correlation between trismus and pain killer usage (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to analyze long-term muscle and nerve toxicity and their correlation between doses in nasopharyngeal cancer patients following radiochemotherapy. Despite the advances in radiotherapy techniques, it is necessary to pay attention to the doses of the nerves and muscles for late effects.


Subject(s)
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Humans , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/therapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
2.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 41(8): 1505-10, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26960729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Liver fibrosis is an important prognostic determinant in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Hepatic artery resistivity index (HARI) is a doppler ultrasonography (US) parameter that is used to follow up microcirculatory resistance in fatty liver. We aimed to asses whether it is possible to demonstrate significant fibrosis by means of doppler US in comparison with transient elastography (TE) and liver biopsy in NASH patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 63 (mean age 47.1 ± 8.4 years, 39 male, 24 female) biopsy-proven NASH patients were enrolled in this prospective study. The study population was classified into two groups: significant and no-significant fibrosis patients. Doppler US and TE were performed in two groups. RESULTS: HARI and TE values were significantly higher in significant fibrosis group (0.81 ± 0.05 vs. 0.63 ± 0.14, p < 0.0005; 15.9 ± 4.8 vs. 6.2 ± 2.6 kilopascals, p < 0.0005; respectively). Based on the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off value of HARI for a significant fibrosis was >0.75, which yielded a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 75%, with the area under the curve at 0.90. The optimal cut-off value of TE for a significant fibrosis was >9.8 kilopascals, which yielded a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 91%, with the area under the curve at 0.95. HARI values were moderately correlated with TE values (r = 0.53, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Doppler US has moderate % sensitivity and % specificity, which is lower compared with TE for the diagnosis significant fibrosis. However, it may be used as an alternative method for the assessment of fibrosis in patients with NASH who are not good candidates for TE evaluation.


Subject(s)
Elasticity Imaging Techniques/methods , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnostic imaging , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/complications , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...