Evaluation of the inter and intraobserver reproducibility of the GRASP method: a goniometric method to measure the isolated glenohumeral range of motion in the shoulder joint.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intra and interobserver reproducibility of a new goniometric method for evaluating the isolated passive range of motion of the glenohumeral joint in an outpatient setting. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study on healthy subjects. The Glenohumeral ROM Assessment with Scapular Pinch (GRASP) method is a new method for assessing the isolated range of motion (ROM) of the glenohumeral joint (GH) by a single examiner with a clinical goniometer. It measures the isolated glenohumeral passive abduction (GH-AB), passive external rotation (GH-ER) and internal rotation (GH-IR) with the arm at 45º of abduction. These three GH ROM parameters were measured in both shoulders of 30 healthy volunteers (15 males/15 females, mean age:41.6[SD = 10.3] years). The full shoulder passive abduction, passive external rotation and internal rotation 45º of abduction were measured by the same examiners with a goniometer for comparison. One examiner made two evaluations and a second examiner made a third one. The primary outcome was the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the measurements assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the Bland-Altman plot. RESULTS: The intra-observer ICC for isolated glenohumeral ROM were: 0.84 ± 0.07 for GH-ABD, 0.63 ± 0.09 for GH-ER, and 0.61 ± 0.14 for GH-IR. The inter-observer ICC for isolated glenohumeral ROM were: 0.86 ± 0.06 for GH-ABD, 0.68 ± 0.12 for GH-ER, and 0.62 ± 0.14 for GH-IR. These results were similar to those obtained for full shoulder ROM assessment with a goniometer. CONCLUSION: The GRASP method is reproducible for quick assessment of isolated glenohumeral ROM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Evaluation of a novel portable three-dimensional scapular kinematics assessment system with inter and intraobserver reproducibility and normative data for healthy adults.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intra and interobserver reproducibility of a new system that assesses the three-dimensional humero-scapulo-thoracic kinematics using wearable technology in an outpatient setting. To obtain normative data with the system for scapular angular motions in three planes. METHODS: The SHoW Motion 3D kinematic tracking system is a motion analysis system that uses wireless wearable non-invasive inertial-magnetic sensors to assess the three-dimensional kinematics of the shoulder girdle. The sensors are placed over the skin in the sternum, scapular spine and arm to precisely define angular motions of the humerus and the scapula with three Degrees of Freedom (DOF) for each segment. The system was used to measure the scapular angular motions in three planes (upward/downward rotation, internal/external rotation and anterior/posterior tilt) during two shoulder full-range movements (flexion/extension and abduction/abduction) in both shoulders of 25 healthy volunteers (13 males and 12 females, mean age: 37 [standard deviation 11.1] years). In a first measuring session one examiner made two evaluations alternating with another examiner that made a third evaluation. In a second session, one week apart, the first examiner made a fourth evaluation. A mean curve was computed from the normalized data for each measurement to obtain normative data for scapular angular kinematics. Intra and inter-observer reproducibility was evaluated using Root Mean Square Error Estimation (RMSE) and Coefficients for Multiple Correlations (CMC). RESULTS: Both shoulders of the 25 volunteers were evaluated four times. The two hundred resulting kinematic analyses were pooled to get normative values for relations between humeral elevation angles and the three angular movements of the scapula. The system showed at least very good (CMC > 0.90) intra and inter-observer reproducibility for scapular tilt and upward-downward rotations both in flexion and abduction. For scapular internal-external rotation the results were acceptable (CMC > 0.75) but not as good, especially for the abduction movement. RMSE calculations showed consistently good reproducibility with RSME< 4° for all three angles evaluated in flexion and abduction. CONCLUSION: The SHoW Motion 3D kinematic tracking system is a quick, reproducible and easy to use system for the assessment of scapular angular kinematics in healthy adults. The data obtained is similar to that obtained with other validated methods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The presented system is portable, easy to use and fast. It also has good intra and inter-observer reproducibility, making it a good tool to assess objectively scapular dyskinesis in the clinical setting. The normative data obtained is consistent with previous information available.

Instability severity index score values below 7 do not predict recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of the Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS) in predicting an increased recurrence risk after an arthroscopic Bankart repair. METHODS: Retrospective review of a cohort of patients operated in three different centres. The inclusion criteria (recurrent anterior instability [dislocation or subluxation] with or without hyperlaxity, arthroscopic Bankart repair) and the exclusion criteria (concomitant rotator cuff lesion, acute first-time dislocation, surgery after a previous anterior stabilization, surgery for an unstable shoulder without true dislocation or subluxation; multidirectional instability) were those used in the study that defined the ISIS score. The medical records and a telephone interview were used to identify the six variables that define the ISIS and identify recurrences. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-three shoulders met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 140 subjects (22 females/118 males; mean age 35.5 ± 7.9) with 142 (89.0%) shoulders were available for follow-up after 5.3 (1.1) (range 3.1-7.4) years. There were 20 recurrences (14.1%). The mean (SD) preoperative ISIS was 1.8 (1.6) in the patients without recurrence and 1.8 (1.9) in the patients with recurrence (n.s.). In the 117 subjects with ISIS between 0 and 3 the recurrence rate was 12.8%; in the 25 with ISIS 4 to 6 the rate was 20% (n.s.). CONCLUSION: For subjects with anterior shoulder instability in which an arthroscopic Bankart repair is being considered, the use of the ISIS, when the values obtained are ≤ 6 was not useful to predict an increased recurrence risk in the midterm in this retrospectively evaluated case series. The efficacy of the ISIS score in defining a group of subjects with a preoperative increased risk of recurrence after an arthroscopic Bankart instability repair is limited in lower risk populations (with ISIS scores ≤ 6). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Low prevalence of relevant associated articular lesions in patients with acute III-VI acromioclavicular joint injuries.

PURPOSE: To define the prevalence of associated articular injuries in patients with severe (Rockwood's III-VI) acute acromioclavicular joint injuries and to find out how many of these were associated with the traumatic event and required surgical treatment. METHODS: Retrospective observational multicentric study performed in ten centres included patients who required surgery for acute acromioclavicular joint injuries between 2010 and 2017. The inclusion criteria were: presence of an acute acromioclavicular joint injury (grades III-IV-V-VI) and surgical treatment within 3 weeks of injury that included a full arthroscopic evaluation of the shoulder. Basic epidemiological data, severity of the original injury, prelesional sport level and prelesional work site requirements were recorded. The presence of intraarticular glenohumeral lesions and information of their characteristics, treatment, and whether each lesion was considered acute or pre-existing was also recorded. RESULTS: Two-hundred one subjects [mean (SD) age 36.7 (11.7) years] with acute acromioclavicular joint injuries (110 Rockwood type III, 34 type IV, 56 type V and 1 type VI) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 28 (13.9%) associated articular lesions were found. These lesions were more often found in grade IV injuries (26.5% in grade IV vs 11.4% in grade III, p = 0.037) and presented in males (18.7% in males vs 4% in females, p = 0.015). Age, laterality, sport level or work requirements did not affect the prevalence of associated lesions. Twelve were rotator cuff tears (6 PASTA lesions, 3 partial supscapularis tears, 2 bursal supraspinatus tears and 1 full-thickness supraspinatus tear), 16 were labral tears (9 anterior, 1 posteroinferior and 6 SLAP). Only 14 (50% of lesions, 7% of total subjects) were considered acute and all but one (an SLAP type 2 tear) required further surgical attention. Most pre-existing lesions were left untreated (n = 7) or managed with minimal debridement (n = 6), and only two required further surgery. The prevalence of associated lesions that required surgical management was 7.46%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of relevant associated lesions in subjects with acute grade III to VI ACJI is relatively low. Only 14% of subjects have an associated lesion and only half of these required further surgical attention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series, level IV.

Multidirectional Instability: Natural History and Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Multidirectional instability (MDI) represents a great challenge to the orthopedic surgeon. When treating these patients we must be aware that instability refers to a symptomatic situation, thus multidirectional instability is defined as symptomatic involuntary instability in two or more directions, and should be clearly differentiated from asymptomatic hyperlaxity. It may be associated with hyperlaxity, either congenital or acquired following repetitive stress, but also may be present without hyperlaxity, which is rare. METHODS: We searched in the online data bases and reviewed the relevant published literature available. RESULTS: Many differences can be seen in the current literature when identifying these patients, unclear definitions and criteria to be included in this patient group are common. CONCLUSION: Understanding the complex shoulder biomechanics as well as being aware of the typical clinical features and the key examination signs, which we review in this article, is of paramount importance in order to identify and classify these patients, allowing the best treatment option to be offered to each patient.