What do you mean, 'negotiating?': Patient, physician, and healthcare professional experiences of navigating hierarchy in networks of interprofessional care.

Interprofessional collaborative practice is a phenomenon that can be fraught with power dynamics between professions, within professions, and between professionals and patients. In the literature, the dominant notion is that conflicting viewpoints and interests arising from unequal power dynamics can be resolved through negotiation. This study examined COPD patients, health professionals, and physician experiences of negotiation within 10 interprofessional collaborative COPD care teams. Physicians, patients, and healthcare professionals each had strikingly different conceptions and experiences of negotiating their perspective with other team members. Our study suggests that negotiation is an idealized notion rather than a relational process embedded in interprofessional collaborative practice. Importantly, we found that the ability and opportunity to negotiate one's perspective is heavily influenced by one's position in the workplace division of labor and professional hierarchy. We conclude that "negotiation" is only one approach among many in navigating interprofessional relations. Further, the rhetorical and ideological appeal of "negotiation" may overstate its role in interactions in interprofessional care settings, and lead to a misunderstanding of the power dynamics at play. It may be naïve to assume team members can control their situation through the competitive assertion of their individual perspective in a rational debate. Unfortunately, adopting the language of negotiation uncritically may not offer relevant solutions to structural and collective problems within a healthcare workplace.

Macro and meso level influences on distributed integrated COPD care delivery: a social network perspective.

BACKGROUND: Care guidelines for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend an integrated approach for holistic, flexible, and tailored interventions. Continuity of care is also emphasised. However, many patients with COPD experience fragmented care. Discontinuities in healthcare and related social services are likely to result in disjointed rather than integrated care which can negatively affect patient health outcomes. The purpose of this qualitative study was to improve our understanding of, and how, contextual features pertaining to structures and processes of COPD integrated care influence delivery of care within patients' healthcare networks. METHODS: We conducted individual interviews with 28 participants (9 patients, 16 healthcare professionals, and 3 spousal caregivers). Participants were recruited through the lung clinic at a city hospital in western Canada. We employed a social network paradigm to analyse and interpret the data. RESULTS: The analysis revealed an overarching theme of fragmented COPD care with two sub-themes: (1) Funding shortfalls and availability of resources, and (2) Dis(mis)connected communication pathways. The overarching theme depicts variations, delays, and discontinuities in patient care. The sub-themes describe how macro level influences and meso level shortfalls were perceived to influence the availability of respiratory care resources that contributed to fragmented COPD care. CONCLUSIONS: Employing a social network lens drew particular attention to family physicians' pivotal role in delivering community-based COPD care. While an integrated approach to care is recommended by care guidelines, institutional and organizational structures and processes, such as financial and communication structures, may inhibit delivery of integrated care. Thus, macro and meso level structures and processes have the potential to shape patient care by constraining family physicians' purposive and communication actions necessary for facilitating an integrated distributed approach to care. We propose a context of care which fosters a context for family physicians' delivery of patient-centered care. Integrated care delivery may improve patients' wellbeing and alleviate financial constraints on the healthcare system.

Contextual Competence: How residents develop competent performance in new settings.

INTRODUCTION: Medical education continues to diversify its settings. For postgraduate trainees, moving across diverse settings, especially community-based rotations, can be challenging personally and professionally. Competent performance is embedded in context; as a result, trainees who move to new contexts are challenged to use their knowledge, skills and experience to adjust. What trainees need to adapt to and what that requires of them are poorly understood. This research takes a capability approach to understand how trainees entering a new setting develop awareness of specific contextual changes that they need to navigate and learn from. METHODS: We used constructivist grounded theory with in-depth interviews. A total of 29 trainees and recent graduates from three internal medicine training programmes in Canada participated. All participants had completed at least one community-based rotation geographically far from their home training site. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and anonymised. The interview framework was adjusted several times following initial data analysis. RESULTS: Contextual competence results from trainees' ability to attend to five key stages. Participants had first to meet their physiological and practical needs, followed by developing a sense of belonging and legitimacy, which paved the way for a re-constitution of competence and appropriate autonomy. Trainee's attention to these stages of adaptation was facilitated by a process of continuously moving between using their knowledge and skill foundation and recognising where and when contextual differences required new learning and adaptations. DISCUSSION: An ability to recognise contextual change and adapt accordingly is part of Nussbaum and Sen's concept of capability development. We argue this key skill has not received the attention it deserves in current training models and in the support postgraduate trainees receive in practice. Recommendations include supporting residents in their capability development by debriefing their experiences of moving between settings and supporting clinical teachers as they actively coach residents through this process.

Learning From Patients: Why Continuity Matters.

PURPOSE: Patient continuity, described as the student participating in the provision of comprehensive care of patients over time, may offer particular opportunities for student learning. The aim of this study was to describe how students experience patient continuity and what they learn from it. METHOD: An interpretive phenomenological study was conducted between 2015 and 2016. Seventeen fourth-year medical students were interviewed following a longitudinal clinical placement and asked to describe their experiences of patient continuity and what they learned from each experience. Transcripts were analyzed by iteratively refining and testing codes, using health system definitions of patient continuity as sensitizing concepts to develop descriptive themes. RESULTS: Students described three different forms of patient continuity. Continuity of care, or relational continuity, enabled students to build trusting and professional relationships with their patients. Geographical continuity allowed students to access information about patients from electronic records and their preceptors which allowed students to achieve diagnostic closure and learn to reevaluate their decisions. Students valued the learning that accrued from following challenging patients and addressing challenging decisions over time. Although difficult, these patient continuity experiences led students to critical reflection that was both iterative and deep, leading to intentions for future behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Patient continuity in medical education does not depend solely on face-to-face continuity. Within various patient continuity experiences, following challenging patients and experiencing unanticipated diagnostic and management outcomes trigger critical reflection in students, leading to deep learning.