Seed priming with gibberellic acid induces high salinity tolerance in Pisum sativum through antioxidants, secondary metabolites and up-regulation of antiporter genes.

Salinity is one of the major abiotic stresses that limit productivity of pulse crops all over the world. Seed priming with phytohormone(s) is one of the most promising, authentic and cost-effective methods to mitigate the deleterious effect of salinity. The study was conducted to investigate potential of seed priming with gibberellic acid (GA3 ) to cope up with the adverse effects of salinity (0, 100, 200 and 300 mm NaCl) in pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. There were different responses to salinity, which induced oxidative stress, higher accumulation of Na+ in shoots and roots and inhibition of photosynthetic traits. However, seed priming with GA3 showed promising effects on physiological traits under salinity stress and alleviated the adverse effects of salinity by inducing the antioxidant system, proline production, total phenol and flavonoid content and regulating ion homeostasis, along with up-regulation of Na+ /H+ antiporters (SOS1 and NHX1). Plants adapt and prevent high salt accumulation by inducing expression of Na+ /H+  antiporter (SOS1 and NHX1) proteins that enhance Na+ sequestration. Thus, seed priming with GA3 is important in alleviation of high salinity stress and can be used as a criterion for developing salt-tolerant cultivars.

Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as biomarkers for neonatal bacterial infection.

AIM: Neonates are predisposed to bacterial infection which are an important cause of early childhood morbidity and mortality globally. It has been proposed that procalcitonin has significant utility as a diagnostic marker for bacterial infection in febrile neonates when compared to C-reactive protein (CRP). The aim of this study is to conduct a literature search to find the best available evidence to answer the clinical question of the utility of procalcitonin when compared to CRP as a predictor of bacterial infection in febrile neonates. METHODS: Medline/PubMed was searched using the terms 'procalcitonin', 'C-reactive protein', 'bacterial infection' and 'neonatal sepsis'. Three systematic reviews relevant to the clinical question were identified and the key article selected for critical appraisal was the systematic review by Yu et al. (2010). RESULTS: The appraised literature concludes that procalcitonin has moderate accuracy in diagnosing neonatal sepsis, but suggests it should be considered only within the context of other clinical parameters and other relevant investigations. The studies included in the systematic review were of variable quality, showed considerable heterogeneity in their methods and evidence of possible publication bias. CONCLUSION: Further research is required before definitive recommendations can be made about the utility of procalcitonin compared with CRP as a diagnostic marker for neonatal sepsis and bacterial infection in clinical practice.