Rehabilitation process and functional results of patients with amputated fingers.

Digit amputation is a physical and psychological trauma that can influence the daily living of a person. The rehabilitation of patients with digit amputation is a complex process and should take into consideration all influencing factors, such as the functional, emotional, social, and professional profile of the patient. This study was conducted to evaluate the functional level of patients with amputated fingers and to understand the factors that influence their rehabilitation. Fifty patients (42 male and 8 female with an age ranging from 7 to 84 years) who had digit amputation(s) between January of 1990 and December of 1998 at the level of the metacarpus or distal to it and who had at least 6 months of follow-up were examined. The patients were divided into three different study groups: patients with distal amputation were compared with patients who had proximal amputation, patients with one finger amputation were compared with patients who had multiple finger amputations, and patients who suffered finger amputations caused by work-related accidents were compared with those who suffered amputations caused by other incidents. In addition, the time lapse from the amputation was checked as an influencing factor for different functional levels. The results showed that patients with distal amputation reached a higher motor and sensory functional level than patients with proximal amputation. Patients with one-finger amputation reached higher motor, sensory, and activities of daily living functional levels than patients with multiple amputations, and the level of motor and sensory function of patients with finger amputations caused by work-related accidents was lower than that of patients who suffered amputations in other incidents. Time was proven to be an important factor in the process of motor and emotional recovery.

Collateral sprouting in skin and sensory recovery after nerve injury in man.

Two different modes of cutaneous sensory reinnervation are thought to be engaged following nerve injury: regenerative growth of the injured nerve and 'collateral sprouting' of neighboring intact nerves. Although both processes are well known from experimental preparations, there is little unequivocal documentation of collateral sprouting in human skin. We report here on 5 patients in whom at least partial recovery of sensation in the hand following traumatic or surgical nerve section was apparently based on collateral sprouting from nerves that had not themselves been injured. Two types of evidence are brought. In three of the cases a totally anesthetic region of skin at a distance from the site of injury was shown to recover sensitivity long before regenerating nerve fibers could have arrived, given the known rates of fiber outgrowth. In the remaining two cases, nerve blocks using local anesthetics were used to establish that the reinnervated skin was served by a nerve other than the injured one. Thus, collateral sprouting appears to contribute to cutaneous sensory recovery in man as well as in animals.