Comparing patients' and other stakeholders' preferences for outcomes of integrated care for multimorbidity: a discrete choice experiment in eight European countries.

OBJECTIVES: To measure relative preferences for outcomes of integrated care of patients with multimorbidity from eight European countries and compare them to the preferences of other stakeholders within these countries. DESIGN: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted in each country, asking respondents to choose between two integrated care programmes for persons with multimorbidity. SETTING: Preference data collected in Austria (AT), Croatia (HR), Germany (DE), Hungary (HU), the Netherlands (NL), Norway (NO), Spain (ES), and UK. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with multimorbidity, partners and other informal caregivers, professionals, payers and policymakers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preferences of participants regarding outcomes of integrated care described as health/well-being, experience with care and cost outcomes, that is, physical functioning, psychological well-being, social relationships and participation, enjoyment of life, resilience, person-centredness, continuity of care and total costs. Each outcome had three levels of performance. RESULTS: 5122 respondents completed the DCE. In all countries, patients with multimorbidity, as well as most other stakeholder groups, assigned the (second) highest preference to enjoyment of life. The patients top-three most frequently included physical functioning, psychological well-being and continuity of care. Continuity of care also entered the top-three of professionals, payers and policymakers in four countries (AT, DE, HR and HU). Of the five stakeholder groups, preferences of professionals differed most often from preferences of patients. Professionals assigned lower weights to physical functioning in AT, DE, ES, NL and NO and higher weights to person-centredness in AT, DE, ES and HU. Payers and policymakers assigned higher weights than patients to costs, but these weights were relatively low. CONCLUSION: The well-being outcome enjoyment of life is the most important outcome of integrated care in multimorbidity. This calls for a greater involvement of social and mental care providers. The difference in opinion between patients and professionals calls for shared decision-making, whereby efforts to improve well-being and person-centredness should not divert attention from improving physical functioning.

Repeatability of health economic data in COPD.

BACKGROUND: Little is known concerning the precision of self-reported health economic data. AIM: To investigate the repeatability of self-reported health economic cost and utilization data in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: Twelve weeks after inclusion, a physician and a nurse in random order interviewed 29 subjects with post-bronchodilator COPD included from a research registry of COPD patients. The interview recorded healthcare utilization and costs, sick leave, exacerbations and quality of life (QoL). Variation of individual agreement of observations was described estimating kappa statistics and 95% limits of agreement. RESULTS: Mean age was 63 years (standard deviation (SD) 10) and 17 participants were men. Average FEV(1)% predicted was 56% (SD 15). For sick leave, exacerbation, healthcare provider visit, change of medication, assistance and leisure time the kappa values were 1.00, 0.73, 0.73, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.54, respectively. The physician recorded fewer days of exacerbation and fewer contacts with healthcare providers than the nurse (p=0.01 and p=0.05, respectively). The 95% limits of agreement for costs of drugs were -690 to +710 Norwegian Kroner (NOK), -1200 to +899 NOK for costs of healthcare providers and -20 to +26 for QoL as measured by a visual analogue scale. CONCLUSION: Repeatability of economic data from COPD patients showed considerable variation. This issue should be addressed when analyzing cost data from interviews and when designing studies on health economy.

Preferences over dental restorative materials among young patients and dental professionals.

Knowledge of the patient's view is necessary, as patients' rights are an issue of increasing importance in dental practice. This study aimed to examine how dentists (n = 42), dental assistants (n = 65), and young dental patients (n = 306) in Norway and Denmark valued three attributes of dental restorations, namely, expected longevity, the appearance, and the risk of an adverse reaction. According to the discrete choice method, participants were presented with several scenarios, describing different levels of the attributes, for comparison of two restorations (A and B). The differences among patients, dentists, and dental assistants were examined by logistic regression analyses. The likelihood of a dentist favoring one restoration over another was very sensitive to the difference in the expected longevity of the restorations, and much less to differences in visibility. The patients had considerable sensitivity to differences in visibility and much less to differences in duration. Danish teenagers attach less importance to visibility of the restoration and greater importance to the risk of an adverse reaction than Norwegian teenagers. All differences were statistically significant. Preferences associated with properties of dental restorations differ between teenage patients and dental professionals and this should be addressed in clinical decision-making.