Inpatient evaluation of periodontal, esthetic and inflammatory parameters around dental implants and natural teeth.

AIM: The use of endosseous dental implants (DI) has become a successful treatment alternative. However, providing periimplant tissue health and achieving a natural esthetic look are important topics in this treatment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate periodontal and esthetic parameters around DI and natural teeth (NT) and also to analyze myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty DI supported fixed prosthesis and contralateral 20 NT were enrolled to the present study. Clinical periodontal parameters (probing depth, clinical attachment level, gingival bleeding time index and gingival index) were recorded and GCF/PISF samples were obtained from mesial (mesiobuccal and mesiolingual) and distal (distobuccal and distolingual) sites of DI and NT. MPO levels were spectrophotometrically determined. Additionally clinical photographs were obtained and esthetical evaluations were performed by using Jemt papilla index. The parameters belong to DI and NT were compared and correlations were evaluated using statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 40 samples were evaluated. No statistically significant differences were detected between groups in all periodontal parameters and MPO levels from mesial and distal sites. Jemt papilla index scores were slightly higher in NT however, this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Total PES score were similiar in DI and NT groups. Significant correlations were detected between MPO and gingival index values as expected. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that DI and NT have similar inflammatory conditions and esthetics, representing DI as a predictable treatment option. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Dental implants are satisfactory treatments, they provide patient esthetic natural looking, phonetic and masticatory functions.

Comparative analysis of gingival wetness at natural teeth and dental implant sites.

BACKGROUND: "Gingival Wetness (GW)," which is the thickness of residual saliva on gingiva, functions as a moisture retainer and a protective barrier for microbial colonization. Whether dental implant (DI) treatment affects GW scores and whether gingival inflammation has the capacity to alter GW remains unknown. Thus, this study was designed to evaluate the potential impact of DI treatment on GW. METHODS: A total of 118 DIs and natural teeth (NT) sites were comparatively analyzed. Clinical periodontal and periimplant status were determined. Sites were classified into 2 subgroups based on the clinical inflammatory status as inflamed or noninflamed. GW was measured by standardized paper strips and quantified by micromoisture meter. RESULTS: Gingival index, clinical attachment loss, plaque index, and gingival bleeding time index scores were generally lower at DI sites. Significant differences were seen in clinical attachment loss, plaque index, and gingival bleeding time index in inflamed sites, presenting higher scores for NT. Comparable values were observed for DI and NT regarding GW for all sites. No differences were noticed in GW scores between the noninflamed NT and DI sites and also wheninflamed sites were concerned. CONCLUSIONS: DI treatment does not seem to result in any apparent reduction in GW. Thus, it can be speculated that similar protective processes may occur at dental implant and NT sites. Furthermore, GW does not seem to depend on the local inflammatory status of the soft tissues.

Implant stability and peri-implant parameters in free vascularized iliac graft transplantation patients: report of three ameloblastoma cases.

BACKGROUND: Ameloblastoma, a benign but locally aggressive tumor, accounts for 9% to 11% of all odontogenic tumors. Radical procedures, including resection, are performed. To restore functions after resection, free vascularized iliac grafts followed by a dental implant-supported prosthesis are used as a successful treatment option. The aim of this case report is to evaluate the peri-implant clinical status and stability of dental implants placed in patients with advanced-stage mandibular ameloblastomas. METHODS: Examinations of three patients revealed extensive ameloblastomas, and hemimandibulectomies were performed. Six months after surgeries, two to four dental implants were placed. After 6 months of healing, one fixed prosthesis and two removable prostheses were delivered. The stability of implants was evaluated at the surgical baseline and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery by resonance-frequency (RF) analysis. Peri-implant clinical parameters (i.e., plaque index [PI], gingival index [GI], gingival bleeding time index [GBTI], and peri-implant probing depth [PD]) were recorded at the delivery of the prosthesis and at follow-ups at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: Nine implants that supported one removable prosthesis and two fixed prostheses were placed. RF analysis revealed no significant changes in implant stability during 12 months of follow-up. Peri-implant clinical parameters (PI, GI, and GBTI) showed slight improvements during follow-up. Although advancements were observed in 6 months, PDs were found to be deeper than optimal measurements for the whole observation time. CONCLUSION: The implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with ameloblastomas reconstructed with free vascularized iliac crest grafts can be a predictive alternative for improving the quality of life of patients in which a high implant stability and acceptable peri-implant health may be achieved.